While BP is Largest Spill in U.S., Chevron's Ecuador Disaster is Largest in World. Chevron Admits Dumping at Least 16 Billion Gallons of Toxic Waste into Rainforest.
As the nation remains riveted on the tragic BP spill unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico, Chevron still holds the record for creating the world's largest oil-related contamination and it happened deliberately in the populated Amazon rainforest in an even more sensitive ecosystem than the marshes of Louisiana.
Chevron's illegal oil-related dumping is at the root of a class action lawsuit in Ecuador where the oil giant now faces more than $27 billion in damages for poisoning an area the size of Rhode Island with 18.5 billion gallons of toxic "produced water," or more than 474 times the amount of contamination estimated to have been spilled in the Gulf of Mexico tragedy, according to calculations made by representatives of the plaintiffs.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (24)
I am reposting this to bring attention to the environmental damage caused by irresponsible oil companies.
- 5 votes
Thanks for bringing this back.
Shelloil, BP, Texaco, Chevron are all pigs. How wealthy do you need to be that you despoil the very Earth?
Chevron's contamination has decimated the traditional lifestyles of five indigenous groups in the area, and one group has disappeared, according to the lawsuit. The pollution occurred when Texaco (now owned by Chevron) was the exclusive operator of a large oil concession in the rainforest from 1964 to 1990.
A 17-year trial against Chevron taking place in Ecuador's courts – moved there from U.S. federal court in 2002 at Chevron's request – is expected to end later this year. Chevron has declared the trial court is "biased" against it and has announced it will not pay any adverse judgment.
- 3 votes
HEY OCEANA! Where is the outrage?
HEY EDF! Where is the outrage?
HEY Pew Foundation, or whatever you call yourselves! Where is the outrage?
HEY all you ECOFRAUDS !Wheres the OUTRAGE?
PHONY @!$%#IN BASTARDS
- 2 votes
It sounds like the Gulf of Mexico got off easy when you compare that disaster to what Chevron deliberately did to the Amazon.
These are the facts of Chevron's dumping in the Amazon and how it compares to the BP spill in the Gulf:
- In the 1970s, Chevron's predecessor company Texaco (bought by Chevron in 2001) perforated hundreds of oil wells across a 2,000 sq-mile swath of rainforest that was home to the indigenous groups. The area where Chevron operated is one of the most biodiverse in the world, containing almost 10% of the world's plant species.
- Instead of re-injecting toxic "produced water" (which contains high levels of salt, pure crude, and the carcinogen benzene) deep into the ground – the industry practice then recommended by the American Petroleum Institute – Chevron dumped 18 billion gallons of it into rivers and streams. These waters had been used thousands of years by the local population for its drinking water.
- The BP tragedy was an accident; Chevron's discharge in Ecuador was deliberate.
- Chevron, as reported by 60 Minutes last year, also built more than 900 unlined waste pits to permanently store toxic sludge – another violation of industry standards. It then built pipes to drain the sludge into nearby streams.
- Chevron also burned gas without controls, creating enormous air pollution and a "black rain" phenomenon in the rainforest.
- 3 votes
Sounds a lot like BP as well. BP took off the BOP this morning at about 2am. Supposedly doing some cement work but you can see the drill string rotating and all the cement pouring out.
The well is supposed to be dead. How come we still have 3 drilling rigs at site and a hive of activities. There is also a big crack by the side of the well. One thing for sure, the well ain't dead and BP lied.
- 4 votes
BK
Watched some of the video over at ATS, regarding removal of BOP last few days - why?
Kat's most recent post was "BOP moved to safe zone".
So apparently there is an "unsafe zone" -- meaning???
Reminds me of post on GLP where person said "old well" - implies a new well.
- 3 votes
This only confirm all the lies we have been told since Day 1 of the disaster. The capping was a lie. and the permanent KILL was a lie. At the very least Thad Allen should have said, the cement at the bottom kill was only temporary until we figure something out.
- 3 votes
There is a major NW-SE fault running through the macondo wells to where the present DE location. That is why they are working there to skim off the oil. You know what, it is precisely 7 miles from the well A location. So this was the big blow out crater that the late Matt Simmons was talking about.
How do you plug a leaking fault? If the leak runs long enough with significant under toe erosion, I am afraid the Whiting Dome will slide. Now that will cause a major tsunami in the Gulf.
- 2 votes
NOAA watching them is useless also.
Lubchenco had given deep horizon permits against the scientific evidence and towed the BP line during the spill. She also blocked science, such as the South FL scientist who first identified the oil on the gulf floor.
She needs to be out of there.
Chevron and other international corporations who act badly should be brought before the International Court of Law just like a nation would be. Instead, they pick their court and they decidce whether or not they pay the penalty. Law breakers!
- 4 votes
Actually Stephanie the govt should have taken NOAA under Lubchenco to task for not taking preventive action after noting BP's misconduct and safety lapses. Especially coming at the back >7 years of EPA (Pascal) legal attempts to get BP barred from any Govt contracts. This is one public display of serious dereliction of duty.
If this is not proof (fully documented) of corruption (by refraining to take action against BP) then I do not understand the meaning of the word "corruption". Corruption can also mean abstain from taking regulatory action to prevent a disaster by monetary inducement. It happens all the time and this BP disaster is one hell of a "showcase" for this type of corruption. The silence or NO ACTION is deafening.
- 4 votes
BK
Something strange happened around 2:08 on this video Kat posted from ATS - looks like a persons neck and shoulders. I froze that screen shot and asked someone who was not watching the video to take a look (they didn't know what I was watching, and they said it was a man's neck and shoulder).
Here is the picture:
http://img827.imageshack.us/i/nov6personrov.jpg/
Here is the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-2pioSYpsA&feature=player_embedded
It's happens in a flash - so you have to enlarge it and watch carefully around that time.
What do you think it is?
- 2 votes
Eth
Somebody turned on the lights in the background during recording for a split second - either by design or accidental. I had some other effects when I tried recently with some lighting in the room during recording. The light boundary is too sharp to be in the water (site). So It has to be at the recording station or in the feed out of water.
- 2 votes
Thanks BK
Not familiar with recording videos :)
So really surprised me.
- 2 votes
eth
Did you see the big cracks around the wellhead? The problem is deep, real deep. Not sure if BP really knows they are in deep trouble. There is a major NW-SE fault. Difficult for anyone to seal of the leak. Only way is to leak not block. And if they do not do something quick, there is going to be major landslide from the Whiting Dome - and this will cause a major tsunami.
- 2 votes
BK
I wasn't sure if what I was seeing were cracks., because if they were they were very large.
So, are you saying that the oil will actually cause the fault to be unstable due to erosion and cause a landslide - that will equate to an earthquake that causes a tsunami?
Could you explain the dynamics. You may have already, but by now I've forgotten much of what I have read.
Probably a good idea to periodically review it.
- 2 votes
Dang BK
Just went back and looked at where the wells and faults were located on one of your maps
Seems to me the location of the wells would have the most widespread/profound impact were a disaster to occur - i.e. ( 2 fault lines that intersect and several leaking wells with one of them being open to a reservoir with billions of gallons of oil/methane , sitting directly on/adjacent to the fault).
Ties in perfectly with article you seeded BP gulf oil catastrophy being a planned one, something we have alluded to in other comment sections.
- 2 votes
Hold your horses. I am still preparing the article. I have only shown the shallow faults so far and some indication of the deeper major faults in the later articles. I needed a larger model to explain and I found it recently.
Basically it explains a lot. There is a NW-SE tear fault from the Macondo wells to the present DE location to the Coast Guard base. Let me explain fully in the article first. That is why it would be difficult for "BP to mend that broken Oil Well". The geology is truly broken here and it is not tectonically stable as widely believed.
The tsunami will not come so soon but we need to monitor the stability of Whiting Dome and other parts of the shelf edge. The case for large scale collapse is still not clear from what I have seen so we will just leave to submarine landslides for the time being.
- 2 votes
No problem BK
I know the information is not forthcoming from BP and you have to seek it out, and that is time consuming.
I have faith time will reveal it to you.
- 2 votes
Thanks BK. It's so easy to lose sight of these disasters and their impact, thanks to the ridiculous political headlines flooding the media.
- 4 votes
What do BP & magicians have in common? Mass Deception.
- 4 votes
What do politicians and magicians have in common? Mass Deception.
Is this a coincidence?
- 2 votes
Carol, going by logic; if BP =magicians and politicians = magicians then BP = politicians. I would say you are spot on. Thanks for the connection.
- 3 votes
Thanks BK, but it really wasn't that hard to make that connection.
- 2 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



