The recently published National Commission Report to the President of the United States of America (11th January 2011) and BP's own earlier Accident Investigation Report dated 8th September 2010 have focused almost entirely on the failings of equipment and processes on the drilldeck of the Deepwater Horizon, on the seafloor BOP and associated equipment and on the errors and mistakes made in drilling and cementing up of the close to completed well.
The fact is that BP were drilling at Macondo MC 252 in an area of well known and documented geological hazards (known in the industry as "Geohazards"). At Macondo these included such features as extensive beds of frozen gas (or methane hydrates) and a number of layers of artesian overpressured sands where the interstitial natural water pressures could cause casing collapse due to disturbance of those sands. This process is known as "liquefaction", also known in the trade as "shallow water flows" [SWF]. The presence of gas hydrates and shallow water flows in this Mississippi canyon shelf edge zone is very well documented by the MMS, BP and other operators.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (8)
The word “geohazard” is not mentioned once in either of the above reports.
It is entirely possible that BP’s reasonable level of in-house expertise in this part of the GoM in such geologically risky conditions was overridden. Why one might well ask? Because the ultimate “paydirt” at MC252 was a prize of some 50 to 100 million barrels of oil (BP estimate), which for an extraction success ratio of 30% may have been worth 1500 to 3000 million US dollars. Small beer in relation to say, the Tiber prospect nearby but worth it all the same. This guesstimate is based on USD 100 a barrel. As the oil price continues to climb in the coming years, this black gold fortune was worth the risk for BP’s “management”.
- 11 votes
Dear The GallowGlaich;
Thanks for coming forward with your industry’s information. We applaud your courageous action and look forward to more industry’s professionals speaking up. We are what we eat and the Industry is what the workers make it out to be. The people who play the Money GODs and hide cowardly in the boardroom are not the ones who have to face death in their daily work duties. They are not the victims in the event of a disaster. That’s why they could not care less with the reckless management and decisions made with vested business interests at heart and not in the interest of the industry, the safety of the workers, environment or the population going to be affected by their “insane master” plans.
Your article brings tears to my eyes for many personal reasons but most important of all it confirms there are more of us who care enough to step forward. Evil prevails in darkness. With sufficient beacons of truths, we can collectively flush out the darkness of evil and instill back true professionalism in our industry so that we may use the knowledge and technology in earnest search of less hazardous sustainable renewable energy.
I had always thought that I would work until my dying days in the Oil industry. Working with Dr Termotto had convinced me that we should let Oil (as the primary energy) go the way of the coal. There are surprisingly many “new” renewable energy resources available to us. Like a rich pampered child, we all have grown fat and lazy with oil, overlooking many viable alternatives right under our noses. All because of our perceived need of the oil, an addiction we have to let go.
That much, we owe to Mother Nature. Thank you ALL for listening and responding to Mother Nature's SOS call.
- 11 votes
I must give a '!!!' in following the above comments---I cannot express any differently. Thank you BK and the 'others' that are stepping forward. I would like to know more about the 'many' other forms of renewable enrgy to focus upon when that is forthcoming (sonner than later). I do not want to be 'fat and lazy by dependence on oil'--which is where I am at this point. I run a diesel boat for fishing, if anyone has some alternative or adjustment that I can make, please please step forward. I am investigating hydrogen converters (on the generator) to require less fuel. If anyone can point me into a solid direction for this--that would be appreciated or any other idea really:) Thanks again.
- 6 votes
I guess now we know what Dale Jones' new job in the fish trade monitoring in the Gulf of Mexico really means.
- 4 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



