To date, BP and its contractors have used more than 1.8 million gallons of Nalco Holding's chemical dispersants in the Gulf of Mexico in connection with the oil spill, according to the complaint. Nalco was also named in the complaint.
Lawyers said many plaintiffs, who were assisting in the effort to prevent oil slicks from reaching the shore, or cleaning oil spill residue from the beaches, came into contact with crude oil, chemical dispersants and other toxic chemical mixtures.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (10)
This is the clearest proof that BP does not stand for Benevolent Provider but Blatant Poisoning. They knew that Corexit was toxic yet they insisted on using it when there are much better and safer alternatives for dealing with the recovery. Why?
1. they needed to make the thick oil slick disappear fast so that their BP apologists can safely use a couple of molecules thickness (1 ~ 2 microns) to describe the sheen (slick) and provide a totally absurd estimate of the volume of oil spilled. A minimum thickness of 100 microns for the brown-black slick would have raised the volume 50 times. A 200 micron thick slick would bankrupt BP.
2. they had already ordered, produced and stocked enormous amount of corexit in anticipation of the mega oil spill. Screw the environment and clean up crew. They were "high" on corexit. If they do not use up the huge stockpile of corexit, Nalco would be snuffed to death. So it is either Nalco or the gulf residents and clean crew? Your guess is as good as mine, which way the board voted. Procurement of millions of gallons of corexit is not like going to the neighbourhood Walmart to get if off the shelf.
3. they can deceive the public by feeding deceptive and erroneous information to the main media. But can the satellite images and aerial photos lie? No. That why they impose a no fly zone to prevent independent aerial observation as soon as disaster occurred. But just like the ROV videos, there were "well-intentioned" insiders who cannot tell but they can show. For example the close up view of the satellite image . see http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2011/04/19/6495651-did-the-oil-slick-really-spew-from-only-well-a. They needed to sink the oil slick before people realise the volume of oil spewed out was more than the unimaginable thousands of times more than the official estimates from a single 10-inch well. The late Matt Simmons was right in many of his assertions and yet he was "unfairly trashed" by TOD and eventually silenced when the truth was starting to "burst thru the seams".
- 4 votes
This whole affair is criminal genocide against people and the environment.
I'm totally amazed that people are more concerned about birth certificates, Muslims, Palin, and Donald Trump, than they are about this proven, and open destruction.
People scream about abortion as marine mammals have had their abortions chemically induced with Cor-exit, as a world renowned marine scientist denies this, while continuing political genocide of the US fishing industry around this country.
Gulf fishermen were surely scheduled to be destroyed politically, but BP has done the dirty work for her, inducing Cor-exit at the source, sources, of the rupture caused by shoddy drilling practices.
I wonder just how much drilling fluid and additives were released pre-rupture from fracs during the drilling process. The records,I assume were destroyed along with the rig, recording flow rates , and returns, during the drilling process.
The lack of action before,during, and after, by this administration have fostered the feeling of mistrust, and lack of confidence, from top to bottom.
- 4 votes
I suppose it fits their agenda. One bullet kills all. Just curious, how come the gulf fishermen are not resorting to class action against BP for destroying their lives?
- 4 votes
BP has only released 3 billion from the 20 billion. Holding out?
- 4 votes
Give one inch take back a foot. I knew there was a catch when there was no time frame. 20 billions for how many years and I believe that amount was taken out as a credit facility from Goldman Sachs?
- 4 votes
The BP corrution is rampent, and throwingin the mix as a holding company G S is credible.
They make their money the old fasioned way. They @!$%# people over!
With a little help from the bought off GOP.
These bastards have it going their way, and both parties are making it possible.
- 4 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



