Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit BK Lim's column >>

BK LIM

Disasters know no boundaries; saving Mother Earth is our collective responsibility.
Articles Posted: 105  Links Seeded: 412
Member Since: 7/2010  Last Seen: 5/16/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Mega Oil Slick thickness - the pictures tell a much different story

Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:12 AM EDT
environment, bp, gulf-oil-spill, macondo, oil-slick
By BK Lim
Advertise | AdChoices

The evidence in pictures - main article at

how-can-the-mega-oil-slick-be-just-a-couple-microns-thick-if-you-can-visually-see-it-

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/June 2010

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • BK Lim's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Disaster!, Earth News, Newsvine Science, Phoenix Gulf Group, Science And Technology, World News and Views
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (6)
BK Lim

The evidence in pictures.

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:28 AM EDT
jwtiii

Thanks for staying with this, BK

  • 4 votes
Reply#2 - Sat Apr 23, 2011 12:03 PM EDT
BK Lim

jwtiii, the truth needs to be told and someone has to bell the cat.

  • 5 votes
#2.1 - Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:48 PM EDT
Reply
Steve-2203459

BK Lim.....hey...been a while. What say you about the so called new oil slick in the gulf mentioned last month that was supposedly 10 X 100 miles. I have not heard a peep since then, and can't find any new information. Do you have a news about this?

In the media, they were blaming it on some obscure company in Houston or something. Was this from the same well opening from BP?

steve

  • 3 votes
Reply#3 - Sat Apr 23, 2011 12:41 PM EDT
BK Lim

Hi Steve

Long time no hear. Gold and Silver still shooting up? No, Anglo-Suisse's accidental leak cannot account for the 10 x 100 miles oil slick. Check out this article.

http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2011/04/10/6443959-part-1-mystery-of-the-new-found-oil-revealed

A couple of days later, a Houston-based oil company came forward to accept responsibility for the mysterious spill near Grand Isle, although it says it remains "surprised" that what it thought was a minor discharge from a long dormant well could have produced miles-long slicks. The company said it had reconnected the wellhead structure Tuesday (22 March 2011) morning and fully shut it in by 8:30 p.m. The amount spilled was estimated to be less than 5 gallons.

This is probably the case of a convenient scapegoat who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Even if the company had underestimated the amount spilled, the accidental spill which was reportedly noted over the weekend (19 / 20 March) could not account for the 10x100 miles sheen reported on 18 March. The Matterhorn Seastar did not report any spill. As a fully operational production rig, any spill would be an immediate concern. So unless the crews were sleeping on their job, they would have alerted the coast guards as soon as the oil sheen reached visible size like 1 to 2 miles diameters. I do not think American oil workers could be that slack, not to notice until it was over 100 miles long. Elementary, Watson!

Anglo-Suisse Offshore Partners was caught in the act of an accidental spill but the timing and the amount spilled from a dead well could not account for the instantaneous sighting and extent of the observed spill; certainly not the tar-balls. Probably guilty of not reporting previous accidental spills, the guilty-conscious party jumped to admit responsibility. But are we truly happy with napping any culprit without ever knowing the true cause. Is justice truly served when the wrong corporation ends up taking the tab? Could Justice in America have sunk to the level of dictatorial 3rd world countries where an innocent can be sent to the gallow for justice to be seen to have been done? Surely not.

  • 3 votes
#3.1 - Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:46 PM EDT
Reply
TR-421173

!!!

  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:15 AM EDT
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com