Water sample analysis conducted independently by EcoRigs shows a positive correlation to BP’s oil spill samples. “The presence of fresh BP MC 252 crude oil in surface waters 2 to 14 months after the well was reported to have been capped suggests that crude oil from the BP DWH MC 252 field may have found new pathways to the seafloor.” The evaluations conducted also reveal that the toxic chemical Corexit is now being applied to the subsurface leak located 1500 meters beneath the ocean’s surface at the wellhead. This is done with the intention of further decomposing the oil so that the smaller particles do not make it to the surface and the continuing oil spill can be easily kept from the public eye.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (7)
The source further reports that between May 2010 and March 2011 long after the reported capping of the BP well in July of 2010 the average toxicity levels in the Gulf Region waters from Texas to Florida were persisting at unsafe levels and that, in some cases, they were thousands of times higher than EPA established safety threshold levels. It was during this same period of time that federal government agencies put out propaganda saying everything on the Gulf of Mexico was safe, including seafood, air and sea water.
- 2 votes
If you look at this map from USGS of earthquakes, it's makes you wonder how they figure there aren't many earthquake fault lines in the Gulf.
Wikipedia: The 2006 Gulf of Mexico earthquake was a 5.8 magnitude[1] earthquake that hit the Gulf of Mexico on September 10, 2006, about 250 miles west-southwest of Anna Maria, Florida around 10:56 AM EDT.
The quake was reportedly felt from Louisiana to Florida. There were no reports of major damages or casualties[2]. Items were knocked from shelves and seiches were observed in swimming pools in parts of Florida [1]. The earthquake was described by the USGS as a midplate earthquake, the largest and most widely felt recorded in the past three decades in the region[1].
And this mapping from the University of Florida: Although the rate of seismicity in the Gulf of Mexico is relatively low, the Gulf of Mexico is not seismically quiescent. Since the late 1800's there have been about 10 earthquakes large enough to be located which occurred in the eastern Gulf of Mexico.
September 10, 2006 Gulf of Mexico earthquake. Top view: Gulf of Mexico crust and overlying sediments prior to redistribution by hurricane Katrina. During the hurricane, Mississippi River sediments deposited in shallow water near the Gulf Coast were redeposited to deeper Gulf waters. Bottom view: Added delta sediments in the deep Gulf increase the load on the underlying Mesozoic oceanic crust of the Gulf, causing it to flex down. Shallow portions of the crust undergo compression during flexure, producing the earthquake on a steeply-dipping fault plane. The fault may have occurred by reactivation of an older Rift sequence fault.
- 2 votes
Thanks for your links, Stanley. Always good to hear from you.
Yes I totally agree with you. One reader has been faithfully recording and observing the USGS antics of disinformation. If you are interested in more info please contact MajWilliamMartin (MWM) at http://majwilliammartin.newsvine.com/
http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/site/?pageid=event_desc&edis_id=UGE-20110726-31736-USA
While it was noted that the USGS did a Wonderful job with their disinformation ( AS USUAL) I think it would only be fair to mention that the said,
Youtube User was correct in what he saw and also what I saw and I recorded too.With NO Visible clouds (NONE) (ZERO) a Person could view the Plumes from these Mountain Tops. These are the (Same Plumes) that the USGS said were Thunderstorms by their Press Release. Only one Problem... There were NO CLOUDS for a Thunderstorm. DUH!!!
Case in point also the Youtube users Father worker with Boeing many years ago with FLIR RADAR, This Son is not dumb when it comes to Radar and Radar Signatures.
Another case, Suddenly there is a VOLCANO off the Oregon coast. With LAVA Tubes that are spewing 12 Feet Wide from the Plumes coming from it's Vents. Would it not perhaps suggest that this Build-up of Volcanic Pressure could have been linked in some way to these old Vents up and down the California Coastal area?
As for Myself, I watched many of these "Events" I recorded one here. http://k7ktr.com/dutchsinse/k7ktr.flv The Video is taken with a regular camera so it lags at the start but gets better. You'll notice... NO CLOUDS. NO FOREST FIRE, Only a PLUME that I watched for over a 40 Minute period before I decided to record it. If you decide to view it, (You Probably wont) The PLUME is about 2.5 - 3.0 Inches to the LEFT SIDE of my Displayed Mouse Cursor.
- 2 votes
ah mother nature, always something new..or old. It's a big world and finding out what's under the water is still a work in progress. :)
- 2 votes
Let's not talk about the ocean, even beneath the land is a mystery....like the 23 Aug Virginia Quakes?
- 2 votes
Not really a mystery all that much. There are old fault lines. If you look at this, the red lines being the Ring of Fire, when Mexico over to Puerto Rico group has earthquakes, plus the Atlantic, the theory 'creeping' earthquakes occurs. When one big one goes off, several smaller ones follow. Or if a medium one hits, then smaller ones. ergo creeping. :)
The scientists are working on figuring out when a big one hits where the next smaller ones will be. It may help for advance warning on the small ones anyway.
- 2 votes
IRY!!! Thanks for having the guts to keep putting the information out there. Stay safe my brother.
- 2 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



