Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit BK Lim's column >>

BK LIM

Disasters know no boundaries; saving Mother Earth is our collective responsibility.
Articles Posted: 105  Links Seeded: 412
Member Since: 7/2010  Last Seen: 5/16/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

BP doctored & relooped video to make-believe BOP was still intact at 3rd well after 2nd blowout

Fri Jan 27, 2012 10:06 PM EST
environment, bp, oil-spill, gulf-of-mexico, macondo, mega-oil-spill
By BK Lim
Advertise | AdChoices

 

The truth of the disaster is:

1. BP drilled 3 wells (well A, well B and then the third which was labelled BE).

2. The blowout that occurred at 2200 CDT 20 April 2010 did not breach the base cement plug as we had analysed as far back as July 2010. It was caused by a shallow gas influx from the gas-saturated weak Sub Formation (GWSF) zone.  See http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/30/4781973-why-is-bps-macondo-blowout-so-disastrous-beyond-patch-up

3. The more disastrous second bottom-hole blowout occurred on the evening of 22 April  (after 1700 CDT). It was induced by a powerful explosion detonated from within the well. This started the mega oil spill in the gulf. The BOP, riser and top hole casings were blown off the well and lay scattered on the seafloor.  In its place, the famous crater with the oil spewing out. BP called it the 2nd leak on the riser. Tony Hayward tried to twist it further by saying "It was only a small leak in a big ocean".

4. They had to fake the standing BOP from earlier recorded footage. The only trouble is ....there was no gas/oil spewing from the cracks in the Bent Riser. Because the videos on 23 April onwards were all recorded before the 2nd bottom hole blowout. 

5. 20 days later, they reassembled the riser onto a new BOP at well A. What you saw then was the "fake blowout gushing well" while the real gusher well was bellowing 720 ft NW of well A.

Hard to believe. Stay tuned as we present even more evidence. If this is not the truth, we would have been tripping over a thousand times since July 2010. The fact that we did not, shows we had been on the right path towards unearthing the whole truth about this disaster. The truth is so much stranger than fiction. Wait till you read the coming series, currently in their final drafts.

BP's deception in the Gulf, exposed.

BP's killing spree in the Gulf ~ dealing with long term environmental consequences of the Gulf disaster

The mafia in the global oil industry ~ the crime of mass destruction and unscrupulous market manipulation behind these mega oil spill disasters.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • BK Lim's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Disaster!, Earth News, newsviners in the news, Phoenix Gulf Group, Science And Technology, World News and Views, Writers
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (17)
BK Lim

It is either magic (as in land of Oz) or deception.

The bent riser could not bend and unbend from 10:23 CDT 22 April to 08:56CDT 23 April 2010.

  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Jan 27, 2012 10:10 PM EST
mstanley2265

BK, I'm not a video expert or an underwater video expert, but Dive #464 is obviously not a close up as is Dive #465...which is practically on top of it, see the robot arm in #465? I do know that underwater footage does contort the view unless you are right up on top of it.

The Macondo platform is on the bottom of the Gulf. It's a mess. BP, TransContinental and all the other companies involved have no way of 'covering up' anything. It is obvious when the oil comes to the surface and floats around, not counting all the video of the Macondo Blowing sky high. Which by the way meant a whole lot of natural gas or methane.....or both.

There are leaks of oil wells on land, and there will be leaks from oil wells under water. Heck Chevron has a deepwater drilling leaks too. They All are running into problems Deepwell drilling underwater.

And it's going to make a mess of the oceans if they Don't stop the drilling problems. China is going for even deeper wells. geez.

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Fri Jan 27, 2012 11:33 PM EST
bore-head007

report-white-house-pressured-scientists-to-underestimate-bp-spill-size-mother-jones

  • 4 votes
#2.1 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:22 PM EST
mstanley2265

bore, trying to come to an Accurate figure on the number of barrels of oil, from the blowout, in the Gulf is not the same as figuring out how much is in a barrel. The Estimate was 4.9 million barrels...give or take a couple thousand. The Prospect was 50 million barrels in the reserve and that too was an Estimate, at a depth of over 8,000 feet. 5,000 feet being the Gulf floor.

  • 1 vote
#2.2 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:09 PM EST
bore-head007

The administration dispatched it geniuses. Have you ever read this? I've posted it a zillion (estimate) times.

http://www.fishnet-usa.com/NOAA_Inaction.htm

  • 4 votes
#2.3 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:28 PM EST
BK Lim

Stanley,

The video clearly showed that BP submitted relooped video footage to Congress. Those lying bastards. They blew the well on purpose then doctored relooped video. The fact is there were more leaks on the seafloor and they drilled 3 wells all of which were leaking, some more and some less. Well A was chosen for the dog and pony show because the leaks (mainly gas) came thru the fault seepage.

Our guess is at least 10 times more than the official estimates on only one well (the shallowest). We have all been fooled to look ad analyse at only well A. The late Matts Simmons was right on the money and they killed him.

  • 4 votes
#2.4 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:48 PM EST
mstanley2265

bore: Airborne is the NASA ER2 and Flying the Gulf of Mexico after spill and yes I read it. :)

BK here's some video from EnergyBoom.com Here's before and after the explosion CNN underwater footage Here is video where the Shear clamp bisects the riser pipe Here's where the ROV examines the BOP June 2 2010 00.41GMT and here is a whole lot more of the video's

The deal is this, if there was more oil being released from Any wells, it will show up on the surface because oil floats and since there are not enough 'slicks' showing up, that means the oil is not leaking.....like it was. NASA video's would show it.

As to Matt Simmons, he had a heart condition, that's a given, he was in a hot tub, which is not something that someone with a heart condition should be doing. Because the blood pressure goes down and when they are on blood pressure meds, too low and major problem. There was an autopsy done, he drowned and the contributing cause was heart attack. Which means his heart was scarred from the heart attack. Also, he was an overweight white male and from video's of him in 2009, if I was related to him, he'd been at a cardiologist's office so fast he wouldn't have had time to complain.

Not only that but most people have 'little' heart attacks prior to the big one, so there would have been more damage. My brother in law had so much that almost 11/2 of his heart had hardened. He had had numerous small ones prior to the one that put him in the hospital.

Low blood pressure, also called hypotension, would seem to be something to strive for. However, for many people, low blood pressure can cause symptoms of dizziness and fainting. In severe cases, low blood pressure can be life-threatening.

    #2.5 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:51 PM EST
    mightyj

    The deal is this, if there was more oil being released from Any wells, it will show up on the surface because oil floats and since there are not enough 'slicks' showing up, that means the oil is not leaking.....like it was

    That is not entirely correct. As a person who has lived most of his life on the water I can tell you of personal experience with sizable oil spills inside of harbors that were dispersed with cleaning agents bought at the local market that kept the local population and the coast guard entirely unaware and the coast guard station was Right There.

    Armed with corexit which can be easily piped to flow directly into leaking oil and is a superior dispersant to anything I have ever used and leaking in the middle of the ocean far from land I am certain they should be able to cover up an enormous amount of leakage. Under perfect conditions with no current leakage oil will be floating up into the water column and causing small slicks for the next decade or more. Dispersed oil is not, "Cleaned Up" it has been combined with a molecule that allows it to sink to the bottom of the ocean. Those molecules have a tendency to break apart over time allowing small amounts of oil to come up from the bottom and re-enter the water column.

    Please be assured that if this spill had not occured in open waters the area surrounding it would have been entirely polluted for decades or more. If you think that the government and NOAA were entirely forthcoming with their information about this spill consider this.

    When the spill was only a week old NOAA could not find any oil that had leaked from the well even though all of the oil was still located in a small search perimeter (Time versus current movement widens a search area over time due to drift, tides, and even weather.) After oil had been leaking for 6 months NOAA announced that they had found all of the oil even though the search area was now the equivelant of all of the land mass on the planet. The fact that so much of it was just dispersed and would be likely to come up into the water column later was never mentioned.

    How are those oil funded environmental campaign donors working for ya now?

    • 3 votes
    #2.6 - Mon Jan 30, 2012 3:49 AM EST
    BK Lim

    Stanley, I had a look at this video

    Here's before and after the explosion CNN

    and the title of the video

    FULL VIDEO Oil Rig Explosion Injures Workers and Causes Raging Fire off
    Louisiana Coast

    But the fire is on a fixed platform with the vent tripod etc. Looks more like a production platform. Towards the end, the platform disappeared under the waterline in choppy seas and waves. More like the north seas. Very different from the other video of the DWH burning and sinking.

    This cannot be DWH and video taken even in the Gulf.

    • 3 votes
    #2.7 - Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:32 AM EST
    BK Lim

    from EnergyBoom.com

    This video is interesting. Seems to show them retrieving the casing and parts of the BOP. It cannot be too far away from the blown and broken well. Again this confirms well A with its wellhead intact could not be the well that blew on 22 April.

    • 3 votes
    #2.8 - Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:55 AM EST
    BK Lim

    There are leaks of oil wells on land, and there will be leaks from oil wells under water. Heck Chevron has a deepwater drilling leaks too. They All are running into problems Deepwell drilling underwater.

    There are differences between accidental and deliberate spills. But when a company intentionally fake and reloop videos, it is more of the latter.

    Coming articles will delve deeper.

    • 3 votes
    #2.9 - Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:03 AM EST
    BK Lim

    And it's going to make a mess of the oceans if they Don't stop the drilling problems. China is going for even deeper wells. geez.

    Agree totally. It is the production costs that matter. Take the shallow wells on land with production costs less than 10 USD and deepwater production costs exceeding 80 USD. The only way it makes sense is to drive up oil prices above 100 USD. Then again it will take many years (decades) to recover the billions in investment costs provided oil stays at that level.

    The quick and dirty way to recoup and even make hefty profits (using various financial instruments) is to "control the weather / disaster". You control the weather (so to speak) you control the wealth. It is like rigging the casino. It is the fastest way of mass transfer of wealth from the gullible public who had toiled for years in saving for their retirement years and wanting to see better returns from the miserable low bank interest rate which had been kept artificially low.

    • 3 votes
    #2.10 - Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:19 AM EST
    Reply
    TR-421173

    More & more lies. Thanks for spreading the truth.

    • 4 votes
    Reply#3 - Sat Jan 28, 2012 12:40 PM EST
    mightyj

    Not buying anything from BP anymore.....especially not their story.

    • 4 votes
    Reply#4 - Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:39 AM EST
    mstanley2265

    mightyj......I did note that the oil wasn't leaking like it was... The Prospect for that well was 50 million barrels of oil...impossible to not acknowledge the blowout (estimated loss 5 million barrels of oil) especially since the whole platform went out as shown on video. As to an oil driller 'covering up' a leak, there are leaks on land, it is not to be expected that there wouldn't be leaks underwater anywhere there is deepwater drilling.

    .....On land a directional mess....a blowout Mexico blowout on land and here's what happens when the BOP doesn't work properly on land. When this happens on land, it is a whole lot easier to contain, underwater depending on the Depth of deepwell drilling, a 100 times more difficult because of the water pressure at that depth, because of the massive and fast dispersion of the oil in the water.

    Deepwater oil drilling .....isn't for sissies just as sailing the seas isn't

    As long as there is YouTube and someone video's from a cellphone, information on oil blowouts and leaks ....is going to show up on it.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#5 - Mon Jan 30, 2012 8:19 AM EST
    Lebowsky

    Here is the best site I found and used during the BP Gulf Oil Spill. From it I had every ROV camera's web address, independant of who wanted to show what and when. There is probably an extensive archive of the conversations there. Great source and very informative from members.

    The Oil Drum

    • 3 votes
    Reply#6 - Mon Jan 30, 2012 8:52 AM EST
    LT student

    You mean Totally Obfuscated Dumpsite. Had a good laugh with this

    jaybao.newsvine.com/_news/2010/09/06/5055776-the-lowly-arsehole-bathy-being-the-mightiest-of-them-all

    • 3 votes
    Reply#7 - Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:04 PM EST
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse |
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com