Prof. Michio Kaku: Nuking The Oil Spill Option - Radioactive Oil Not A Good Idea - YouTube

Was the shallow quake that shook Louisiana on 1^st Aug 2010 caused by a Nuke at 18,000 ft bsl?

Before we dismiss this as an isolated insignificant coincidence, correlate other unusual tectonic events connected with this broad NW-SE fault zone which terminates beyond the New Madrid Fault zone in the NW and the Macondo Prospect in the south-eastern end. On 01 Aug 2010 23:34 local time (02 Aug 04:34 UTC) a surprise shallow quake with a magnitude of 3.0 struck Louisiana. The epicenter (5 km deep at 30.873º N 90.874º ~USGS) was approximately 230 miles from the Macondo well following the same line of direction as the gas bubble incident on 22 April, 2010.

Was it another coincidence the 3^rd Macondo well (well BE) was observed to be spewing again since 2Aug 2010? After the early failures of the Junk Shots-Top Kill attempts, BP assured the world that the relief wells (not one but two) would be the only reliable method to kill the spewing rogue well. BP needed only 2 months for the relief wells to reach the target kill depth of 18,000ft bml but nobody raised any eyebrow when they said 3 months. Well maybe, one more month for contingency. Sensitive video footages that had to be smuggled out confirmed Relief Well C intercepted Well BE at 18,000ft bml level as early as the first week of July. BP was seen retrieving long damaged casings from a hole at the seafloor on 29 July 2010. Since the well heads of well B and well A were observed to be intact (and casings do not grow underground) they had to be working on well BE, the “missing third well”. They were obviously getting ready for the grand finale of killing the well permanently on the 1^st of Aug after more than 3 weeks of “on-off” unsuccessful attempts to “bottom-kill” it? What did the Relief Well team detonate on 02 Aug 04:34 UTC, to permanently seal the stubborn rogue well? Nuke it?

5,707 viewers.

Keith Olbermann @ 0:15 Nuclear Option. @1:08 "Nuke Baby Nuke".

Officially, Obama ruled out Nuking but as we have seen with all the evidence so far, they were doing just the opposite of the official version. Did they nuke the well on 1 Aug and caused even worse damage to the fragile Salt Geology?

Perhaps Richard K Moore was spot on the NWO agenda of depopulating the Gulf region. Listen to Prof Michio Kaku why he thought nuking was a crazy idea just like the "3 stooges with nuke". His description of the nuking the well and producing radioactive tarballs seems to fit what had been going on in the Gulf. Putting 1 to 1, did WH lie when they said the NUKE option was absurd and off the table?

But Thad Allen told ABC "we have to run out of a lot of things before we do something like that". Which basically says ..they did after they tried everything for the whole of July. This makes a lot more sense than the official BS version where the relief well was less than 20 ft since early July but did not intercept till mid Sept. It is like the famous saying "I smoke Marijuana but didn't inhale".

The above was extracted from the forthcoming articles on the BP Gulf Deception saga.