-
BK Lim et al (2012 Dec 07). https://www.facebook.com/BKLimGeo?ref=tn_tnmn
“The only people who don't want to disclose the truth, are the people who have something to hide.” ~ Barack Hussein Obama August 21, 2010. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhFB7-w2MY8
Disaster Capitalism & the blow-outs on the 3rd well (well BE) from 20-23 April 2010.
It was no coincidence that two US Navy (USN) submarines were despatched to the Macondo site on the eve of the 20 April 2010 DWH “accident”. Apparently their covert mission of sinking the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) with a military secret “Death Ray” weapon (also known as Directed Energy Weapon used to dustify 3 WTC buildings in 9/11) was aborted prematurely after puncturing a hole on the DWH helipad. Their real target was one of the two float pontoons (beneath the helipad) in order to sink the burning DWH; the real reason for the mysterious elongated hole on DWH heli-landing deck which had puzzled millions around the globe.
Top BP executives controlling, closely monitoring and video-taping the “blow-out accident” from a few miles away, realised their “objective of breaching the poorly cemented bottom-hole” had not been successful. Oil was not “free flowing” out of the Macondo reservoir as they had eagerly anticipated. This could only mean that initial hydrocarbon influx had to come through the top-hole breaches in the well instead of the “intentionally flawed cement job” at the bottom of the well (bottom-hole).
Halliburton's intentional flawed cement job was specifically designed to “fail”, to trigger the desired bottom-hole well blow-out. BP's bottom-hole hydrocarbon influx analysis and report had to be prepared well in advance of the actual blow-out event. To “control the crowd” and to capitalise the instant viral “tsunami” effect of the disaster, BP's bottom-hole hydrocarbon influx blow-out analysis and details had to be disseminated to certain “need-to-know parties” well ahead of the “event”. And who were the “need-to-know parties”? Obviously the pro Oil Mafia industry experts, investigative reporters, public speakers, radio-talk hosts and schill-bloggers who could be depended on to “programme” the public on BP's “screen play” version of the disaster. It is like filling an empty bottle with toxic lies first so that the truth can be left out. With the cyberspace filled with chatters and dis-info from BP's sources immediately after the staged blow-out, there would be limited opportunities for truly independent experts to weigh in. Even if they managed to, their independent voice of truth would be easily drown out. One perfect example would the TheOilDrum and DrillingAhead forum. One enterprising ex-oil field executive was bold enough to send out newsletters warning of an impending fire-sacrificial disaster on Hitler's 121st birthday.
One must really wonder at the urgency of their blog postings. How on earth could these “ordinary bloggers” have gotten such detailed technical information within hours; ahead of the main stream media and official press conferences? One captain who goes by the blog-name “Anchorman” at GCaptain, was among the first to post details of the blow-out which could not have been known to anyone except the planners of the crime. Most significantly, the exact time of the blow-out (21:45) since everything was clouded by chaos and confusion. It is a one in a million chance thing that someone could actually catch (video) the blow-out within seconds of the incident from a vessel that was not supposed to be at the accident site.....not unless the whole “accident” was a set up.
2011Feb18 America's 911-II USCG-BP-Transocean Caught in a Contrived Plot To Blow Up Dwh
How did Anchorman know that all personnel abandoned rig 10 minutes after mayday call at 21:52 CDT at that time, 10 miles away? Why did it take more than 10 minutes for the Matterhorn platform to relay the distress call to D8? Why didn't the BP-operated Nakika platform pick up the distress call 15nm away and relay it directly to BP or Transocean, under their Emergency Response Procedures (ERP)? It would presumably take less “fumbling time” than Matterhorn platform (which is still no excuse).
Yet Anchorman, an independent witness could pick up the “event (@21:45)” 10 minutes before the mayday call; a full 20 minutes ahead of Matterhorn's distress alert.
The first public blog reporting on the DWH rig fire (by anchorman on Gcaptain.com) was 21:34 (-6 hours or 22:34 CDT) or 45 minutes after the official Mayday Call from DWH. Anchorman was just 10 miles away but was stuck on anchor. No reasons or explanation were given.
At 12:27am (1:27 CDT 21 April) 2nd posting by Anchorman:
We are 10 miles away, but we are stuck on an anchor and ccan not assist. This happened @2145. Ten minutes after the mayday, they abandoned ship and the flames were at least 200' tall. It's still raging and it's 0130 in the morning now. I called Transocean when it happened and they were not aware, but the Coast Guard just called them, I updated them. So, I gave them my assessment. Several vessels are conducting search patterns at this time. The head count on the rig was reported to be 129, but there has not been a hard count on the radio. We are going to the location within the hour.http://gcaptain.com/forum/offshore/4805-deepwater-horizon-transocean-oil-rig-fire.html
What is wrong with this first response scenario? More detailed analyzes would be coming out of Lambert's investigation later but at this preliminary stage, the conspicuous absence of both BP and Transocean was just too “loud” to miss. Why?
More than 2 ½ years later, after many facts contrary to BP's scripted version of the disaster had surfaced and after independent expert analyses concluding that this was a manufactured disaster with sinister agenda, these WMDs (whores of mass deception) continue to regurgitate BP's preblow-out scripted “screen play” and technical prognosis in seminars, blogs and main stream media.
So while they rushed out in record time, to put out the dis-info and distorted facts, why are they so slow in retracting the “amazing details” which had been proven to be contradictory and woefully inconsistent with observed facts and data? BP's scripted “physics of impossibilities” could never have happened in reality except only in Hollywood movies.
We had analysed and refuted BP's fairy-tale version with diagrams, video and photo evidence in no less than 75 articles published by Samaritans in the alternative media. A complete series can be found at http://bklim.newsvine.com. A few deleted articles due to schill-pressure can be found at http://our-manmade-disasters.blogspot.com/.
Dis-info confirm complicity and staged disaster
How does one differentiate dis-info by paid schills from the facts by independent experts who want nothing more than just to get the truth out there? Just remember the following quotes:
A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes ~ Mark Twain.
Lies have speed but the Truth has endurance ~ Edgar J. Mohn.
Frauds need lies to propagate. So lies appear first. Truth always appears later after the lies had been exposed.
Lies travel much faster than Truth but have limited shelf-life. Truth lasts forever.
Paid dis-info schills always miss the forest for the trees and yet can be so damn accurate with some fine-comb details only the planners of the crime could have known. How could Anchorman (or anyone on the rig) have known the well blew at exactly 21:45 on the night of the disaster, without the benefit of tracing the time-line of events accurate to the minute?
Unknown to them, the first explosion occurred an estimated 5 seconds after power loss on the rig and termination of real-time data transmission on the Sperry-Sun system at 21:49 CDT. Anchorman's time was 3 minutes fast (forward). So if Anchorman was watching his clock and assuming his eyes were trained on DWH 24/7 for the last 3 months from 10 miles away, he might have just caught the instance of the first explosion on DWH. Even so, the earliest time he could have reported the blow-out (based on the instance of the first explosion) was 21:53 since his time was 3 minutes faster.
The actual blow-out (defined as the first instance gas-oil-mud overflowed onto the drilling derrick), could not have been visible to him 10 miles away in the darkness of the night. If he was alerted to the rig blow-out and fire by the May Day call sent out at 21:52 CDT, then the earliest time he could have seen DWH on fire was 21:55 CDT (3 minutes plus the time of May Day call at 21:52). So obviously, Anchorman was engaged to be one of the eye-witnesses with prepared scripts prior to the actual blow-out at site. And this was not his only blunder as an amateur play-actor eye-witness. Of course they could have engaged an experienced actor with a better stage performance than a real out-of-work captain but imagine the public furore once the identity of the actor is exposed.
Even with a cast of world class actors, “stage bloopers” can never be truly eliminated with numbers and mathematics. Offshore operators are usually very meticulous with the regular updates of personnel on board (POB) their vessels; especially the numbers with regular intervals on a daily basis. All offshore operations maintain an accurate and up-to-date POB list at all times.
How could Anchorman have known the headcount on the rig was 129 (POB) when on the same sentence he admitted “there has not been a hard count on the radio”? The correct POB was 126 at 21:45 CDT 20 April 2010. So Anchorman was wrong but not as ridiculously wrong as the USCG transcripts at 18:57 CDT (more than 3 hours before the actual incident) which put POB as 144. The only logical answer to these blunders is that the POB count given to Anchorman and USCG were actual POB counts (or estimates) hours or days before the actual blow-out. It is also possible that some of the senior executives who were supposedly on visit to DWH for the MMS safety award ceremony, got “chicken feet” at the last minute and decided to transfer to the observation vessel (10 miles away?) to avoid being collateral damage.
Next, the burning DWH could not have drifted 714 ft (accurate to the nearest feet) from the well location (well A) in perfect calm water, still anchored to the BOP on top of the well by the super strong marine riser. Remember the DWH and marine riser were rated to withstand Hurricane conditions. The Marine Riser did not break until 10:22 CDT 20 April 2010, 36 hours later.
If the DWH had really drifted 714 ft with the non stretchable steel marine riser still intact and attached to the BOP, the burning rig should have sunk by at least 50ft (another simple physics). Next it would be impossible to measure any distance to the burning rig accurate to 1 feet? The best BP can estimate from the radar is 10-30 ft since no vessel can be alongside the burning rig to get an accurate GPS fix. BP must have calculated the “false drift distance” from the known coordinates of the 3rd illegal well (BE) and the original 1st well (A). This is a very common mistake made by crooked surveyors / navigators in fabricating fictitious events as opposed to what actually happened in an offshore accident far away from casual eye-witnesses.
With the hindsight that BP was drilling at the 3rd illegal well (BE) on 20 April 2010, it is easy to see (logically) that BP had to invent this LIE (714 ft drift) prior to the blow-out incident. Their original plan was to cause the “disastrous blow-out” at well A which of course went astray with the pesky shallow gas problems. By the time BP drilled into the Macondo Reservoir at 18,360ft bsl, BP had spent over $100 million (> 3 times their budget), almost 3 months (> 3 times the intended drilling period) and a host of other “superlatives” unheard off, for an untested exploration well in a prospect with only 50 million barrels of reserve (much too small for deep water production). It was totally absurd for any company to go to that extend just to explore one well (a pinhole peek at the reservoir). BP had every intention to cause a major oil spill using the Macondo well as the sacrificial lamb; for financial windfalls and to save BP's other deep water projects in the Gulf.
No surprise BP executive who knew of the MIHOP disaster, would also try to cash in their BP shares. The evidence is in the massive sell-off of BP shares by dozens of BP directors, executives and key employees just prior to the disaster. Together with the last minute Puts Options in Transocean, BP and Halliburton shares plus a host of other financial scam instruments, even the most sceptical would agree that there was foul play in drilling the 3rd illegal (unauthorised with no Approved Permit to Drill) well.
No amount of grease money could hide these public facts. BP would very much like to hide the significance of these insider-trading facts by directing public discussions to focus on their gross negligence, aggressive cost-cutting measures and apparent desperate measures to arrest the haemorrhage of a run-away well. For the twist to work its “David Copperfield” magic, BP must make sure BP's paid Pre$$titudes or WMDs (whores of mass deception) black-out any public perception of BP having drilled more than 1 well.
But could BP control the outflow of leak info from the tens of “innocent” vessels and sorties involved in the SAR (search & rescue), fire fighting and recovery operations? BP could only plant “black infiltrators” as key personnel in certain areas of operations. They certainly could not buy up anybody or everybody as the schills like to argue in defence of the “accident theory”.
Even with a blanket Blackout Policy, the planners were certain news of the 3rd illegal well would and could leak out. There would be hundreds if not thousands of rescue, fire-fighting, coast guards, recovery efforts workers at site with GPS instruments. So before some smart Alec point out the obvious (the burning DWH at a different location from where it was supposed to be), BP had better made it known that the burning wreck (having lost it dynamic positioning capability), had drifted 714ft northwards.
Again BP could not suddenly declare this out of the blues. It would be like a innocently naughty kid declaring to the returning parents that he did not eat all the cookies in the house. Some BP schills need to start commenting on the subject first. Thus we see some sea captains introducing the subject matter just hours of the disaster; pretending to discuss whether the DWH had anchors when most modern semi-submersibles operating in deep waters all have dynamic positioning without the need for long anchor chains.
Unsafe anchoring patterns – designed to fail (real reason for Marianas damage in Hurricane Ida)
Speaking of long anchor chains, a fundamental flaw in BP's story pops to mind. Why would the “most accident prone global giant” with the worst environmental and safety violations in history, RUSH one of the “oldest, aging drilling rigs which was also conveniently scheduled for expensive extensive overhaul” to one of the worst and most dangerous drilling locations on the planet? The aging soon-to-be-scraped or overhauled Transocean Marianas was ill-equiped to drill in 5000ft of water. At such deep water depths, a semi-submersible with dynamic positioning would very much be preferred, safe operation wise. Imagine spending days just to get anchor on location. The bathymetric chart was prepared with the Transocean Marianas in mind.
Speaking of which, safe anchoring radii need to be 3 times the water depth (Shell safety anchoring standards). Thus for 5000ft water depth, the bathy clearance survey should have surveyed an area covering 15,000ft from the proposed well location. So MMS was again complicit in approving BP's exploration plan where the anchoring radii was only 6,500 ft. Woefully inadequate in the event of a strong current, let alone Hurricane Ida (peak intensity of 105 mph on 8 Nov 2009). Let us not even talk of cost-cutting. The anchor patterns were designed to fail even with the slightest weather. See the anchoring radii for well A and well B bathymetry chart.
Now we know why BP had to rush to reach the Macondo reservoir just in time for Hurricane Ida. The Mariannas leg could not have been so badly damaged had it not been for the twisting and entanglement of the anchor chains around the rig leg. It was supposed to fail in that manner except for the timing. The various delays in the rush and the problem with the shallow gas, had left the first crew struggling to go beyond 4,000ft bml or more than 9,000ft short of the reservoir meant to flood the Gulf.
Just like the WTC twin towers in 9/11 (where the costly replacement of asbestos was long overdue) the aging Transocean Marianas (better off at the bottom of the ocean) was supposed to be destroyed by an inside job disaster. How coincidental? Notice also that ENI hired the aging Marianas (built in 1979) at $565,000/day when the state-of-the-art Deepwater Horizon rig (built in 2000 at the cost of $560 million) was hired to BP at only $500,000/day? ENI's own Saipem 10000 (built in 1985 at a cost of $400 million) which was capable of drilling in waters over 7,000 ft cost only $356,000/day. Like most of the dirty oil industry companies, Transocean was also in the habit of “massaging” their biodata to their benefit. The Marianas was built in 1979 and refurbished by Transocean in 1998.
Collusion and Deception by BPCC, USCG, NOAA & EPA ran deep.
But the worst cases of cover-ups, mass deception and dis-info were committed by BP control command, USCG, NOAA and EPA. USCG had countless opportunities in the first 3 days of operations to call out BP's fraudulent blow-out scam. But they did not. Even an idiot can now see how much the USCG bent backwards to cover BP's criminal liability in this MIHOP disaster. There are at least 25 more of such irrefutable evidence in more than 70 articles written since July 2010.
21 April 2010 22:04 CDT
JD: BP reported the DWH has moved approx 714 ft in the north East direction and is only connected by the MARINE RISER. ~ USCG Transcript.The High Risk Of Capping BP's Gushing Well From The Top -19 July 2010.
Even if a well manages to “drill thru and safely cement” the top-hole section, the poorly cemented top-hole section in a hydraulically connected EGCP zone will continue to act like a dynamic “spring-loaded” charging system; just waiting to blow on the slightest mistake. Despite the nightmares, Transocean’s drilling crew managed to control the well until it reached their targeted depth and oil reservoir. Displacing the drilling mud with seawater (too early) was a mistake that triggered the blow-out. As the pressure inside the well continued to drop, the mixture of mud, clay slurry and eventually gas were forced back into the well. With continuous gas kicking-in at the top-hole level and no mud column to counter the gas bubbles’ rapid ascent through the riser, it was like “drinking out of a straw”.
To understand how BP could have committed so many blunders on the “opening night of the Macondo staged show” one must understand the tremendous pressure BP was under to blow the well (as the excuse for the mega oil spill and to spray millions of gallons of Corexit) after multiple failures to do so in 2009. The privileged elites had betted and lost heavily on a “mega oil spill accident in the Gulf” that failed to materialise time and time again.
The combined impact of 3 major oilspills in 3 of the world's richest economies (US, UK & Australia) producing 12% but consuming 24% of the world's oil (2010 est.) would have shocked the global oil market into hiking the lethargic oil prices to new highs.
But thanks to the good old shallow gas hazards, only the Australian Montara platform managed to spill oil for a total of 74 days from 21 August 2009 until 3 November 2009. There are many good geological and technical reasons why the 2008 Caspian Sea and 2009 North Sea (among the other dozens of blow-outs globally) failed to mega-spill crude from their deep reservoirs where the sabotage of the Montara Platform had succeeded. The details will be in another technical paper.
The 3 Macondo wells drilled by BP also showed that it was almost impossible to mega-spill from the deep reservoir in the presence of overlying shallow gas (predominantly methane) accumulations. Contrary to the myths disseminated by BP's paid WMDs, crude oil did not gush out of the Macondo reservoir through the well until the deliberate demolition charges were exploded at the preset time of 17:22 CDT 22 April 2010. Note the easy to remember numericals such as “22”, “17”, “10” being used repeatedly to set the triggers.
For instance the premature seawater-drilling mud replacement commenced at 20:00, 10 hours earlier than scheduled. The base cement needed at least 24 hours to fully cure. If there had been pressing questions of possible cement failures, cement losses to formation breakdown, why would Halliburton's engineer Nathaniel Chaisson specifically declared that the Halliburton Cement team did a great job at 05:45am? The blow-out was officially timed as 21:45 CDT, almost 5 minutes before the first reported explosion.
Just as the 9/11 Inside Job , pertinent questions were intentionally ignored in the official investigations. Were the Presidential Commission afraid to know for sure that this was a manufactured disaster designed for multiple sinister objectives?
20 April 2010 ~ Congress Hearing documentation
Cement Bond Log. BP's mid-April plan review predicted cement failure, stating "Cement simulations indicate it is unlikely to be a successful cement job due to formation breakdown." Despite this warning and Halliburton's prediction of severe gas flow problems, BP did not run a 9 to 12-hour procedure called a cement bond log to assess the integrity of the cement seal. BP had a crew from Schlumberger on the rig on the morning of April 20 for the purpose of running a cement bond log, but they departed after BP told them their services were not needed. An independent expert consulted by the Committee called this decision "horribily negligent”.05:45 20 April 2010 ~ USCG Investigation
With no lost returns, BP and Halliburton declared the job a success. Nathaniel Chaisson, one of Halliburton's crew on the rig, sent an email to Jesse Gagliano at 5:45am saying "we have completed the job and it went well." He attached a detailed report stating that the job had been "pumped as planned" and that he had seen full returns throughout the process. And just before leaving the rig, Morel emailed the rest of the BP team to say "the Halliburton cement team ... did a great job."
20:00 20 April 2010 ~ BP Report Real time data
Internal blow-out preventer (IBOP) and annular preventer opened and pumping of seawater commenced down the drill pipe to displace mud and spacer from the riser.
21:49 20 April 2010 ~ BP Report Real time data
Rig power lost. Sperry-Sun real-time data transmission lost. First explosion occurred an estimated 5 seconds after power loss. Second explosion occurred an estimated 10 seconds after first explosion.
The 20 April 2010 Blow-out failed to flood the Gulf with massive crude from the Macondo Reservoir.
The 20 April 2010 blow-out was a failure in flooding the Gulf with massive heavy crude from the Macondo reservoir. The satellite images certainly showed no massive oil slicks on 21 April 2010. Although the weather was equally clear and calm, no satellite imageries from 22 – 24 April 2010 had been released to the public. There can be no coincidence.
Reminder note: BPGOD 2009 was planned to happen in the thick of the hurricane season. Besides the excuse to rush and spray millions of gallons of Corexit, the hurricane would also help to push the oil onshore on record time. At the same time, the Louisiana caverns storing the toxic wastes, butane and other SPR (strategic Petroleum reserves) were ripe for collapses and explosions. This would have created a “HELL ON EARTH” Armageddon on the Gulf coast. Besides giving enough reasons to forcibly evacuate the whole Gulf coast region, BP would not be “standing alone so naked on the public prosecution stand”. Everything would be blamed on the “terrible weather” and most of the presently glaring flaws would be swept under the “hurricane” carpet. An almost perfect plan which unfortunately did not get off the staring track as we had seen. Otherwise, Agenda 21 and FEMA (Forceful Extermination of Millions of Americans) would have been in full force by now. Divine Intervention?
Coming back to BPGOD 2010, the first massive oil slicks would have appeared on the morning of 23 April. Crude started to gush out of the Macondo reservoir into the 3rd illegal well soon after the demolition charges were denoted at 17:22 CDT 22 April. But the oil gusher well contributed less than 10% of the massive crude discharges that occurred over tens of miles of the permeable edges of the continental shelf and salt domes including along the major oil - leaking faults. Rear Adm Mary Landry stated very clearly in the Friday morning CBS show (23 April 2010) that there was no oil crude emanating from the BOP, well head and the vicinity sea floor hours even after BP Rov videos were already showing otherwise. At 17:30 CDT 22 April 2010 thick black plumes of oil were already gushing out of the sea floor crater at exactly the 3rd illegal location.
Even the timing of the detonations clearly implicate the USCG of abetting BP in setting off the mega oil spill. The demolition charges set to cut the marine riser, were preset to explode at 10:22 CDT 22 April 2010. Seven(7) hours later at 17:22 CDT the well head was blown off. The nuke device in Relief well C was set off at 23:22 CDT 1 Aug 2010.
There are just too many coincidences in the 2010 Macondo blow-out, 2009 and 2008 world series of planned blow-out-mega oil spills. The Global Oil Mafia with all their international network of criminal contractors, could not have pulled them off if not for high level government CIA (Collusion, Industrial Intelligence and Abettment). The documented evidence are available for public viewing. Thus, the best way to hide is not behind closed doors but out in the open. Bernie Madoff exploited the same Wilful Blindness to scam his rich and powerful clients for more than 3 decades.
Although the Macondo blow-out was out of synch and out of schedule, the Privileged Elites and Oil Mafia were never deterred from giving up. They simply doubled their bets and pressed harder for an even more favoured “rigged horse race”.
As we have seen earlier, the aging Transocean Marianas was intended to be the sacrificial lamb (rig) in the 2009 planned blow-out. However the wrong timing of Hurricane Ida forced the cancellation of that plan. More intriguing, were the details of the 2009 plan. You will recall that ENI (one of its subsidiary operating in Indonesia) was the main operator, concession holder of the prospect offshore Sumatra. The 2008 mid year blow-out-oil spill at the Straits of Malacca (2008 SOMOD) was planned to hike oil prices even higher than the recorded high of $145/bbl.
According to the late Matts Simmons (author of the much hyped Peak Oil theory) he predicted in August 2005, oil prices would be >$200/bbl by 2010. In August 2005, the oil prices were hovering just at $60/bbl level.
That failed 2008 SOMOD cost the Banksters, Privileged Elites and Oil Mafia dearly. Their grand Disaster Capitalism–Global Oil Control (DC-GOC) Scheme had worked so well until then. Caution was thrown to the wind in over-leveraging one of the biggest expected pay-off ever. It is doubtful the Oil Mafia Agenda21 Runners (OMAR) had alerted their masters of a “little potential problem” at ground level. They had to get rid of the potential whistleblowers at their level, in typical black operation. Lucrative job offers and assignments were used to bait the suspected potential whistleblowers to be killed accidentally at the work site. They could not afford to arouse suspicion or public exposure which could jeopardise future multi-billion PMDs. As each MALA (Made-to-Appeared-Like-Accidents) murder attempt failed, the OMAR became more desperate and the “preys (whistle-blowers)” became wiser to their Machiavellian murderous traps.
In the absence of a perceived shortage caused by a mega oil spill in one of the busiest trade routes, the unsustainable high oil prices started to slide from a peak of $145/bbl in early July 2008. Not only could they not afford a full-blown exposure of their grand DC-GOC scheme, OMAR could not disclose to their Oil Mafia masters the little hiccup to their planned 2008 SOMOD. They would be skinned alive if they told the truth. They kept hoping the whistle-blowers could be disposed off soon. But each failed attempts left even more incriminating trial of evidence which would eventually link to the PMDs and the Oil Mafia.
On the 8th anniversary of 9/11, they manipulated the global oil market. In one week, the crude oil prices dropped from $100.9/bbl to $93.4/bbl and rose by $27.5 to a peak of $120.9/bbl (a typical seismic signature of artificial price manipulation).
But without a major oil spill disaster (2008 SOMOD) there was no support for the artificially inflated oil prices. Oil price started on its steep decline from $120.9/bbl on 22 Sept 2008 to less than $33.8/bbl on 19 Dec 2008. History would have been very different had the Banksters and the Oil Mafia gotten their way of blowing the 2008 SOMOD as planned. Perhaps Lehman Brothers and Dubai World would have been able to gamble their way through if 2008 SOMOD did explode.
By the time, they managed to “hit and kill” the first whistleblower on 24 Nov 2008 (the same day Jim Black, BP's Recovery Commander of BPGOD died in a plane crash 2 years later), it was already too late. The WTI crude price had already skidded to $54.5/bbl with little fundamental support due to uncertainties of the ongoing 2008 financial crisis. But the reptilian Oil Mafia Cabals always manage to survive by killing off their own (survival of the fittest) in lean times. Was the late Matts Simmons one of those discarded in the massive rescue of the Privileged Elites?
The 2009 world series of PMDs was equally disappointing as 2008. With the 2008 SOMOD whistle-blower out of the way, they could execute SOMOD and BPGOD together with Australia's Montara, BP Caspian Sea (II) and UK North Sea Shell oil spills. Now that would truly drive oil prices way beyond $200/bbl. Their objective of >$200/barrel oil was finally achievable before their 2010 target.
But just as they were getting their chess game in order, OMAR reported that the 2008 SOMOD whistle-blower had miraculously recovered from the fatal head blows and survived the 24 Nov2008 assassination attempt. The first 6 months of 2009 was spent baiting him with lucrative job offers and field assignments. All were unsuccessful due to last minute tip-off by trusted insiders in close working relationship with the OMAR. After the failed gun shoot-out (March 2009) and sniper attacks on 1 Aug, the best they could do was to keep him prisoner in his own residence; preoccupied with constant assaults on his barricaded residence.
But the whistle-blower would not be silenced without a fight. Tens of faxes and emails were sent to all the heads of companies suspected to be involved in the conspiracy to execute SOMOD 2009 and copied them to heads of regulatory departments, oil and insurance companies in the Philippines, Singapore, Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, EU and NZ. It was also a fact-finding mission. How powerful was the global Oil Mafia then? More powerful than anyone could phantom.
It was a poker game dare. One small spark against the global dark power of the Oil Mafia. Since then there has not been one BP's style deep water blow-out -mega oil spill incident in the Straits of Malacca or anywhere in Asia where the OMAR operate. This will keep SE Asia safe from another mega oil spill until the 2008SOMOD whistle-blower can be disposed of. This is proof how one small man can make a difference in a world of darkness where 99% is blinded by Greed, Oil and Deception.
Meanwhile they could still plan and went ahead with the blow-out-mega oilspill disasters in UK, Australia and US. As masters in forward planning, any potential obstacles to the success of their plans were systematically eliminated before anyone could realise the connection. Thus we see why Dr TB Manton (as President of the International Oil Spill Control Corporation) was falsely charged and arrested in October 2007, 2 years before the 2009 BPGOD was planned to explode. They can corrupt the government of the strongest nation on earth but they can't win over the hearts and minds of those who remain morally true and incorruptible.
To be continued (Part II of 4 - The collusion & deception in the Gulf deepen)
