Three things you can't hide: The Sun, The Moon and The Truth." ~ Buddha. All that is needed for evil to succeed is that decent human beings do nothing ~ E Burke

BK Lim's Archive
environment
  • Story Photo

    We were finalizing the drafts of doctored evidence and scripted eye-witnesses account of the DWH blowout when Trisha James brought out this photo from her archive. It is such an excellent example of BP's doctored photography and scripted eye-witness accounts, we have to publish them first before the main article is published. Thanks to Trisha James and Peter for bringing back memories and lively discussions leading to the 2nd anniversary of that fateful day.    

    Continue reading this entryContinue reading this entry ...

  • Story Photo

    “One of the last areas that we went to was the rig floor, where they were already conducting the negative test. The first negative test,” Ezell said later. “And the tour group left and left Jimmy Harrell and myself there because they were having a little bit of a problem.”

    Ezell’s “bit of a problem” has since been described by BP as “a very large abnormality” in the pressure readings — most likely caused by gas building up in the well. Highly pressurized methane is almost always present in an oil formation, and if there were leaks or other defects in the walls of the well, this gas could seep in and build up to a potentially dangerous level. In extreme cases, if the pressure from the formation outside (and beneath) the pipe exceeds the pressure of the drilling mud or water inside the pipe, it can lead to a full-on blowout of the well.

    The decisions Harrell made next, and the subsequent ones made by the senior BP man onboard, Don Vidrine, would matter more than just about anything that had ever happened in the lives of the crew.

    If there is the possibility of a gas bubble, or “kick,” in the well, often the procedure is to recirculate all the mud in the pipe from bottom to top to clear out the gas, a process that takes hours. Instead Harrell, not sensing a crisis, chose a quick fix. He told them to bump up the pressure going to the blowout preventer, or BOP, a five-story stack of valves that sits on top of the wellhead on the seafloor and that is supposed to be able to stop a runaway well in an emergency. In a “well control situation,” as the oilmen refer to it, when pressurized oil and gas rush to the surface through the well, any one of the different valves in the BOP is supposed to be able to shut off the flow, the way the valve under a sink might be employed if the main faucet is broken. Harrell’s solution to the problems Wheeler and his crew were having didn’t really address why there might be an abnormally high amount of pressure in the well; it just cranked the faucet tighter, forcing the pressure back down the pipe, from 1,500 psi, which is normal, to 1,900 psi, which was high, but not dangerously so.

    Harrell’s solution worked — for half an hour, anyway, which was long enough for him to consider the test a success and for him to rejoin the visiting executives.

    Not everyone was sure that the problems with the pressure test had been solved, however — especially not Wheeler.

    “Wyman was convinced that something wasn’t right,” Christopher Pleasant, a subsea supervisor, recalled later. Pleasant had just arrived on the rig floor for the beginning of the night shift. “Wyman, he was still, like, shaking his head, he couldn’t believe it.” In part because of Wheeler’s unease, Vidrine and another BP rep agreed to repeat the pressure test. But as Wheeler had reached the end of his shift, this new test fell to Jason Anderson, one shift away from his 7 am helicopter transfer to another rig. Ezell asked if Anderson needed any help.

    “Why don’t you go eat,” Anderson told Ezell. It was now past 6 and Ezell was due in yet another meeting with the visiting execs at 7.

    “I can go eat and come back,” Ezell said.

    “Man, you don’t need to do that,” Anderson said. “If I have any problem at all with this test, I’ll give you a call.”

  • But that is not the only similarity with the Deepwater Horizon disaster. These drilling rigs are equipped with a general alarm designed to go off and signal an evacuation if two or more sensors are triggered within a zone. On the Deepwater Horizon, the general alarm had been intentionally “inhibited”, in essence, it was disabled for well over 8 months prior to the April 20th event. In the North Sea incident, alarms were also being continually activated until they were disabled as well.

    The main point that was addressed in the North Sea incident was lack of well control at the time of well completion when the drilling mud was being displaced with sea water. This situation was exactly the same on the Deepwater Horizon. Early in the day on April 20th a controversial decision was made by BP and agreed upon by Transocean to displace the drilling mud with salt water. This decision directly lead to the Deepwater Horizon disaster.

    So what went wrong with management? The North Sea incident occurred about 4 months prior to the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Transocean’s internal report on the incident was dated April 14, 2010 – 6 days prior to the disaster on April 20, 2010 in the Gulf of Mexico at the Macondo well.

    Had the report and subsequent recommendations from the North Sea incident been disseminated to the drilling management for the Gulf of Mexico operations, then it is likely that the Deepwater Horizon disaster would have been completely avoided.

    Transocean is the world’s largest offshore drilling company with three main divisions – North Sea, Asia and North America. It is management’s responsibility to coordinate the various activities under one’s charge. There is no excuse for poor coordination at management level especially when it comes to safety.

  • Story Photo

    The accident came as it emerged that two more people working on the clean-up have died, bringing the total number of fatalities since the Deepwater rig exploded on April 20 to 13.

    One of the latest casualties died while working on a vessel skimming oil.

    Before yesterday's accident with the cap, up to 60,000 barrels of oil per day were leaking from the oil well - that has now increased but it is not clear by how much.

    Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen said an underwater robot bumped into the vent system before 10am.

    This sent gas rising through the vent that is supposed to carry warm water down to prevent ice-like crystals from forming in the cap.

  • Story Photo

    On 18 February 2012, BK published 911-II A Contrived Plot To Blow Up DWH. Among the many proofs that the BP's Mega Oil Spill was a contrived plot, was the amazing accuracy of Anchorman's eye witness account 10 miles away. How could any bystander know the blowout occurred precisely at 21:45 CDT at that time?

    One definitely could not hear the blowout 10 miles away much less saw the blackish gush of drilling fluid and gas in darkness. The double explosions which caused the rig to be engulfed in flames occurred only at 21:49 CDT.

    Even then the odds must have been astronomical for him to be staring at DWH at the instant of the explosion. Most likely he would have heard the DSC distress call sent out from DWH at 21:52 CDT.

    His gcaptain.com posting suggests his clock was ahead of the standard time by 3 minutes (1:27 gcaptain =1:30 Anchorman). Thus @2145 would have been 2142 CDT which means Anchorman heard the direct mayday call 10 minutes before DWH actually sent out the distress call. It is assumed DWH and Gcaptain.com were automatically synchronised with standard time as they should.

    So to test, I delayed posting An Eye Witness Account Of Dwh Explosion Fire 10 Miles Away until after BK had posted his. Then as a new user (registered on 19 Feb 2012), I sent a private mail to Anchorman requesting an opportunity to ask him some questions. It went off without a copy. I followed with another 30 minutes later. This time, the pm was rejected as his mailbox was full. Half an hour later, I could not log back on. I was deregistered and subsequent activation failed. By then Trisha James had posted Anchorman's witness account and there was a lively discussion on our postings on Gcaptain on Facebook.

    Amazingly after my complaints on my activation problems at Gcaptain, another activation email arrived. This time (4th try) the activation process went smoothly as the first. But not surprisingly, the time zone at Gcaptain changed from -7 GMT (MST) to +9 GMT (JST or Japan Std Time). We had expected that but not the magnitude of change (16 hours). Why?

    Well, wait for the next article.  

    Continue reading this entryContinue reading this entry ...

  • Story Photo

    The Montara accident resembled the Gulf of Mexico accident in that both started with problems in the well itself, and it proved very hard to stop without resorting to further underground drilling, said Elmer P. Danenberger III, who was the top American regulator of offshore oil drilling until his retirement on Jan. 2.

    “There are clearly some similarities,” Mr. Danenberger said.

    Drilling the relief well proved tricky in the Montara spill, which was located in Australian waters in the Timor Sea, between northwest Australia and Indonesia.

  • Story Photo

    In summary, as at April 2009 when the H1 Well had been suspended and the West Atlas rig had departed from the Montara WHP to undertake other work, not one well control barrier in the H1 Well had been satisfactorily tested and verified, and one barrier that should have been installed was missing. In other words, the H1 Well was suspended without regard to PTTEPAA’s own Well Construction Standards or sensible oilfield practice.
    When the West Atlas rig returned to the WHP in August 2009 it was discovered that the 13⅜ ” PCCC had never been installed. The absence of this PCCC had resulted in corrosion of the threads of the 13⅜” casing and this, in turn, led to the removal of the 9⅝” PCCC in order to clean the threads. This was viewed by PTTEPAA personnel as a mere change of sequence that simply involved bringing forward the time of the removal of the 9⅝” PCCC. PTTEPAA’s Well Construction Manager, Mr Duncan, took a positive decision not to reinstall the 9⅝” PCCC. This meant that, according to PTTEPAA’s operational forecast and drilling program, the H1 Well would have been exposed to the air without any secondary well control barrier in place for some 4 to 5 days, with sole reliance on an untested primary barrier (the cemented 9⅝” casing shoe) that had been the subject of significant problems during its installation.
    After the 9⅝” PCCC had been removed, the H1 Well was left in an unprotected state (and relying on an untested primary barrier) while the rig proceeded to complete other planned activities as part of batch drilling operations at the Montara WHP. The Blowout in the H1 Well occurred 15 hours later.
    In the petroleum industry, well integrity is ensured by always having built in redundancies (secondary barriers) to safeguard against a blowout. Unfortunately, in the H1 Well there were no tested and verified barriers in place

  • Story Photo

    This documentary is a must watch. It shows how little we know about our most valuable source. It has great studies and facts that are found by scientists and doctors, about the healing property of water. Researches also point out how water has memory and even react to both positive and negative vibes/waves of human thought. You will never look at water the same after watching this documentary. Thank you for watching and your support.

  • As of Friday noon, large quantities of oil are still gushing into the Gulf, and the first slicks are starting to reach the many beaches along the mouth of the Mississippi. Estimates of the size continue to grow — now up to five times again as large as estimated just yesterday (25 times original 1000 bbls/day). See these amazing photos from the Boston Globe.

    We still don’t know what caused the blowout and explosion, but the Wall Street Journal is running a story suggesting the cause may have been related to the process Halliburton used for sealing the holes and gaps created during the drilling process.

  • The Repsol exploration well that blew out Wednesday from pressure from a shallow gas pocket remained out of control Thursday but was leaking only small amounts of gas and water, state and company officials said.

    An emergency crew from Wild Well Control Inc., based in Houston, arrived about 5 a.m. Thursday at the Qugruk No. 2 wellsite on the Colville River delta, about 18 miles from the village of Nuiqsut. Repsol-North America spokeswoman Jan Sieving said the Wild Well team believed it could kill the well Thursday evening or today, rendering it safe.

  • BK Lim et al (revised 29 Jan 2012, updated 19 Feb2012 ).Credit due to Trisha James, Trisha Springstead, Jbao, Lambert & others for their contribution/updates.

  • Updates: This was originally drafted as part I but amended to part II based on feed backs from a closed group of followers. It was a question of presenting the facts first and the motives later or vice versa. The context of the article remains unchanged except for last minute inclusions.

  • Long Absence of BP related articles.

    Readers would have noticed the long absence of our BP Gulf disaster articles until recently in late January. We stopped writing about BP’s Macondo Blowout & mega oil spill disaster since early Sept 2011. Not because we had run out of issues to write. Not because the disaster and its environmental impact have fallen out of favor or out of the mainstream media’s focus. On the contrary, there was even more to write after an insider’s tip to http://oilspillhub.org. The website was registered on 21 June 2010, under Purdue University.

    Initially it was to concentrate on reviewing the long hours of the early videos. Then there was the cointelpro soon after revealing videos and snapshots were posted on cyberspace by various members of our circle. While the American public was demanding to know the truth of the disaster and the early videos of the accident (crime) scene, BP submitted (discreetly) the eagerly awaited videos to Congress. Why were these revelatory videos not released to the public in May 2010? BP obviously needed time to doctor the videos and to let public anger subside first. It works to their advantage if the truth is known later.

    Only when the lying stops can the healing begin.

    We need to keep the Gulf issues alive, not for any political or monetary gains but for the continuing long term damage to the world's environment and climate from the continuing leak (crude oil, methane and other hazardous gas) from the reservoir and vaporization of hydrate. Despite its far reaching consequences, the hypocrite world leaders continue to be silent and blind to the illegal and corrupt activities in the oil industry.

    Many have risked their lives, overcame tremendous odds and sacrificed hours of thankless unpaid tasks analyzing these ROV videos. Decoys have to be identified from the authentic. Doctored details distinguished from actual ground details recorded at site. Finally, we have to make sense of them all with respect to the time line of real events. To all those who had contributed their time, efforts and collaboration, we salute and thank you. Many more worked silently behind the scene to make these series of articles possible. Your contribution in helping to save the planet and the environment are beyond mere words of thanks and gratitude. With this introduction, we now turn to the second part of the series, “BP's Deception in the Gulf Exposed”.

    The other series “BP's killing spree in the Gulf” (dealing with long term environmental consequences of the Gulf disaster) and “The mafia in the global oil industry” (the crime of mass destruction and unscrupulous market manipulation behind these mega oil spill disasters) are in their final drafts and shall be released later under certain circumstances.

    There is little doubt BP needed to lie to cover the “hole”.

    What the public do not realize is the extend of the cover-ups to hide a really big hole. Not only did BP illegally and indiscriminately drilled 3 wells over a 7 month period, they intentionally blew up the last after fighting through hell to reach the reservoir at 18,360 ft bsl. To the sleepy ignorant world at large, it just does not make any sense. Why spend more than USD200 million just to blow it up? The Nazis burned down their own Reichstag in Berlin on 27 February 1933 for the same reason. Pearl Harbour was allowed to happen to get US into the war. 911 is now confirmed to an inside job. So was Fukushima 311, a deliberate crime of mass destruction planned Khazarian Satanists. Would the BP's Gulf disaster be any different, especially in the light of so many incriminating evidence?

    This disaster is one of the many, designed to push the world into global economic anarchy, mass destruction and catastrophic climate change. There is a lot of mis-information being floated in cyberspace to counter the truth and the real agenda of geopolitics and global control by the cabals. For more background information, please refer to articles by David Wilcock and Benjamin Fulford websites at these websites:

    FINANCIAL TYRANNY: Defeating the Greatest Cover-Up of All Time

    The real reason behind the 911 terror was a battle for control of the global collateral accounts

    BP’s Crime of Mass Deception. - 17 Aug 2010.

    Coincidence is the word we often use when we want to hide the truth and BP’s oil spill disaster has more than its fair share of coincidences. Matt Simmons’ death 2 days ago, is a great loss to all those seeking the truth. In one of his final interviews, Matt Simmons said, “It was painful as can be… to be the only person in the industry that was willing to speak out.” This article is dedicated to him and all living beings on earth that had been harmed by BP or agents employed by BP, in this crime of the century; BP’s Crime of Mass Deception.

    The failure of the latest “static kill” on the wrongly capped well (Macondo A) is the final nail on the head for BP’s crime of mass deception. This article is the first of several series that will present evidence of BP’s crime of mass deception for public discussion. Without doubt, underhand tactics and adulterated data would be used to discredit my articles and me as they had done on Matt Simmons. Self-serving bloggers would be employed by BP to disseminate distorted half-facts and confuse the general public under the guise of technical discussions. Do not be intimidated by technical jargons meant to confuse, for the truth is always simple and logical. There are no hidden motives in my series of articles other than to educate, disseminate the truth and point out the obvious flaws in BP’s crime of mass deception. My expertise in the field of geohazards geophysics, is given here on a pro-bono basis as part of my contribution to Mankind so that we need not live in fear of another man-made disaster.

    One will also need to understand the economics of deep water oil production, global market manipulations and super-quick financial windfalls from predetermined “natural or accidental” disasters. Our (ongoing) investigations led us to connections with other Inside-Job disasters like 911, 311, 26 Dec quakes in 2003,2004 and 2006 just to name a few.

    How did regulatory enforcement fail so badly? Gross negligence, cost cuttings and accidental mistakes were just the facade of an underlying sinister scheme. There is simply no excuse for the multiple blowout craters and gushing leaks over several tens of square miles on the seafloor. BP would have gone bankrupt in an instant once the world knew of the massive irreparable damage BP had done to the Gulf through their indiscriminate drilling activities. They wanted to short BP shares not kill it. Triggering a disaster was the easy part. Controlling the beast was another ball game altogether. BP had no idea how to kill the multi-head hydra monster unleashed from the deep. The easiest way out? “Fake and Confuse” strategy.

    How to convince the world that the oil had ceased leaking from the Macondo reservoir?

    The oldest trick in the world. If you can't make it, fake it. Using the “leaks on the riser” illustration enabled them to collapse the multiple leaks into one single leak at the shallowest well (A). Then when the time was right, they would do a “switcheroo” to well B. The gullible world audience would not notice the difference. They would even applaud the heroic battle. “A responsible global corporate kills the gushing beast”. That was the script until the late Matts Simmons (RIP) started to “pull the loose thread” from the flawed knitting. In his previous capacity, he served as energy adviser to U.S. President George W. Bush. He was, up until his death, a member of the National Petroleum Council and the Council on Foreign Relations. JP Wheeler was another of former Bush Administration adviser who was found dead in a dumspter on 2011 New Year Eve. Like Simmons, he too had to be killed for knowing too much.

    The late Matts Simmons was killed days after their attempt to seal the third well (labelled as well BE) failed.

    Contrary to BP's denials and Rtd Adm Thad Allen's incomprehensible explanations, Relief well C intercepted the rogue well at 18,000ft as early as the first week of July 2010. With an operational cost of 1 million USD per day, why would Relief Well C be “playing footsie” at less than 20ft from the rogue well and did not intercept for more than 2 months? It is like saying “I smoke marijuana but never inhaled”. BP could get away with such blatant lies because no one dared to question stupidity. Direct access to White House helped.

    After multiple failures to stem the gushing flow and out of sheer frustration, an explosive device was detonated at around midnight (local time) on 1Aug 2010 in an attempt to bottom kill the gushing well. It was no coincidence an abnormal 3.0 mag shallow quake struck Louisiana at the same time. The epicentre of that rare shallow quake plots on the same NW-SE fault line which also ran through the “gas bubble” discharge noted on the evening of 22 April (1744 CDT). That shallow gas eruption was induced by an earlier shallow depth detonation within the same Macondo well. It makes perfect sense for a detonation at depth of 18,000ft (5.5km) bsl to trigger a 5 km deep quake more than 200 miles away. And a shallow explosion <6,000ft (1.8km) bsl to induce a shallow gas surge 50 miles away along the same fault line. You cannot get a better correlation than that.

    Apparently, the 1st Aug bottom-kill attempt was not that successful. BP had to abort its scheduled “show killing of well A” in early August. The rogue well started spewing again. Incomprehensible announcements were made on the deferred well killing. The late Dr Manton was silenced with a 15-year jail sentence 5 days later, followed by the late Matts Simmons drowning in the bath tub incident and the late Senator Ted Stevens' plane crash, 2 days apart of each “accident”. The odds must be astronomical for each of these incidents to occur accidentally and independently of each other.

    Silencing The Independent Voices Of Truth On The Bps Mega Oil Spill Gom

    Implication Of Dr TB Manton's False Conviction And Murder

    Miscalculations were probably at fault. Or was it Divine intervention? Both detonated events (22 April and 1Aug) did not yield the expected results. “Man proposes while God disposes” does sound sweet. After the anticipated massive oil spill failed to materialize on 20 April, they were under even more pressure to make it right (sounds familiar to BP's pledge?). They could not afford to take any more chances.

    A disastrous gas blowout with no massive oil spill does not move global markets and oil prices. On the other hand, an anticipated mega oil spill that did not happen at the right time could spell financial ruins as huge bets had been placed to make the huge killings. The markets had to be caught by surprise. With mounting losses from a series of “failed-to-materialise” disasters, they had to make or break. Does the determination to cause a mega oil spill make any sense now?

    The mega oil spill has other sinister agenda as well. A deceptive slow-killing cancerous genocide is more profitable and provoke less public outcry than an outright genocide. Depopulation agenda come to mind.

    The detonated explosion on the evening of 22 April had to be powerful enough to breach the base cement plug to achieve their ultimate objective. No second chance. Too much was at stake. If you can predict the weather, the market is yours for the taking. Like a rigged horse race, a mega oil spill in the gulf had to happen to avoid financial ruins. If the Let-It-Happen-On-Purpose (LIHOP) did not work, they had to resort to Make It Happen On Purpose (MIHOP). But each backup action leaves its own trail of incriminating evidence. Investigators obviously did not seek to find.

    The many financial bubbles (eg 2007 Sub-prime and Housing Bubbles) and the 2008 Global Financial Meltdown were no accident. So were the top hole blowout at 2200CDT April 20 and the more disastrous bottom hole blowout shortly after 1700 CDT April 22. Deception works best when the evidence are shown right under our noses. Many examples were given in part 1 of this series, The Farcical 3 Leaks On The Broken Riser Story.

    Distorted truths are most dangerous when they appear to be the whole truth.

    Deception fools no one if the distorted truths are not publicly disseminated. Hence the need for “independent witnesses” (another name for agents or schills) to spread these distorted truths. Any wonder BP spent 3 times than normal (>$100 millions) in the months following the outbreak of the disaster?

    Every discrepancy is a window of opportunity to seek the truth. The truth will not falter despite the many spanners thrown at it. Followers to our articles would have known the number CoIntelpro operations used to disrupt our independent investigation. There has been useful insiders' information and tips as well. We have grown wiser to their deceptive tactics and mis-information. Our sincere apologies if some of the insiders' leads were not followed up promptly.

    We received many leads on the timing of key events like the “Second Underwater Explosion” (SEU), sinking of the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) and discrepancies in the various logs (mud logs, US coast guards, well activity logs etc). Due to limited resources, various tasks had to be farmed out to volunteers. This article was prepared before we have received all the feedbacks. This jewel of discrepancies among the early responses to the blowout and rig fire is a last minute inclusion to this article.

    Were the US Coast Guards notified of the explosion on DWH 3 hours before BP reported event at 21:49 CDT?

    One keen investigator highlighted an apparent time discrepancy in some of the events found in the USCG log.

    A. 202357Z APR 10 (18:57 CDT 20 Apr 10)

    INITIAL CIC BRIEF// D8 RECVD DSC FROM MOBILE DRILLING UNIT DEEPWATER HORIZON OF AN EXPLOSION ON BOARD. THERE WERE 144 POB. CAUSE OF EXPLOSION UNKNOWN. THERE IS A 285' WORKBOAT AND 2 LIFE RAFTS ON SCENE. 87 POB HAVE BEN RECVD AND ARE ON THE 285' WORKBOAT. 2 H-65'S FROM A/S NOLA, H-65, H-60 AND C-144 FROM ATC MOBILE LAUNCHED AS WELL AS CGC POMPANO AND CGC RAZORBLEL. SEVERAL GOOD SAM'S ALSO RESPONDING. THE RIG COMPANY IS TRANSOCEAN; D8 IS TRYING TO GET MORE INFORMATION FROM THEM. RIG WAS 72NM SE VENICE LA IN POS 28-44N 088-21W. // FOLLOW UP CIC WILL BE AT 0445Z.

    E. 210303Z APR 10 (22:03 CDT 20 Apr 10)

    INITIAL NOTIFICATION. D08 RCVD DSC ALERT FOR THE MODU DWH 45NM ESE OF SOUTH PASS LA. RVCD CALL FROM A RIG 25NM AWAY FROM THE DWH MODU IS ON FIRE AND THERE ARE PERSONS JUMPNG INTO THE WATER AND THEY ARE SENDING 5 VESSELS TO ASSIST. D08 LAUNCHED A/S NOLA A AND B CREWS AND CL44 FROM ATC ALSO REQUESTED ADDITIONAL CREWS.

    H. 210306Z APR 10 (22:06 CDT 20 Apr 10)

    SECTOR RCVD GOODSAM CALL FROM THE M/V RAMBLING WRECK RELAYING COMMS REPORTING THAT THE RIG DWH IS ENGULF IN FIRE AND PERSONNEL ARE ABANDONING THE RIG.

    Note: CDT time difference with Zulu time (denoted by Z in the USCG logs) was assumed to be -5 hours. We had to use our best discretion when no “z” was indicated. BP also had a complete blackout of independent sources of confirmation. Unfortunately we cannot reveal our sources and ingenious means of verifying the truth.

    Item A at 202357Z Apr10 (18:57 CDT) was 3 hours 5 minutes earlier than the mayday distress call sent out from DWH. Item E at 210303Z Apr10 (22:03 CDT) apparently sent from a rig 25nm from DWH (Matterhorn MC243 operated by W&T offshore) was 11 minutes after DWH's mayday call at 21:52 CDT or 14 minutes after DWH was engulfed in flames from multiple explosions at 21:49 CDT. Nakika platform is nearer at less than 15nm but operated by BP. Item H 22:06 CDT was a call received from a good samaritan vessel in the vicinity (about 15 minutes away or less than 5 km with maximum speed of 10 knots) of DWH. The first USCG helo arrived at 23:22 CDT (or 1 hour 20 minutes after the distress call was picked up) according to BP's official report. Why was there a 4-minute delay between the blowout (21:45) and fire (2 explosions at 21:49) and another 3 minutes before Mayday call?

    How did Anchorman know that all personnel abandoned rig 10 minutes after mayday call at 21:52 CDT at that time, 10 miles away? Why did it take more than 10 minutes for the Matterhorn platform to relay the distress call to D8? Why didn't the BP-operated Nakika platform pick up the distress call 15nm away and relay it drectly to BP or Transocean, under their Emergency Response Procedures (ERP)? It would presumably take less “fumbling time” than Matterhorn platform (which is still no excuse). Yet Anchorman, an independent witness could pick up the “event (@21:45)” 10 minutes before the mayday call; a full 20 minutes ahead of Matterhorn's distress alert.

    The first public blog reporting on the DWH rig fire (by anchorman on Gcaptain.com) was 21:34 (-6 hours or 22:34 CDT) or 45 minutes after the official Mayday Call from DWH. Anchorman was just 10 miles away but was stuck on anchor. No reasons or explanation were given.

    At 12:27am (1:27 CDT 21 April) 2nd posting by Anchorman:

    We are 10 miles away, but we are stuck on an anchor and ccan not assist. This happened @ 2145. Ten minutes after the mayday, they abandoned ship and the flames were at least 200' tall. It's still raging and it's 0130 in the morning now. I called Transocean when it happened and they were not aware, but the Coast Guard just called them, I updated them. So, I gave them my assessment. Several vessels are conducting search patterns at this time. The head count on the rig was reported to be 129, but there has not been a hard count on the radio. We are going to the location within the hour. http://gcaptain.com/forum/offshore/4805-deepwater-horizon-transocean-oil-rig-fire.html

     What is wrong with this first response scenario? More detailed analyzes would be coming out of Lambert's investigation later but at this preliminary stage, the conspicuous absence of both BP and Transocean was just too “loud” to miss. Why?

    It is mandatory for BP and Transocean to have manned shore control stations / operation managers on 24/7 standby basis. Any mayday call from their own rig would have been picked up in a matter of seconds. So why would Transocean still be unaware at least 12 minutes after the mayday distress call was sent out. Never mind the developing trouble on the rig as early as 21:45 CDT when the assistant driller called the senior toolpusher to report that the well was blowing out. Like any expecting father, the operation managers at BP and Transocean shore control would be glued to the radio, closely following the operations in the final hours before DWH pulled out from a “strike well”. For BP and Transocean to be caught unaware of the impending troubles on DWH would be complete lunacy. 

    Were BP and Transocean caught sleeping on the job or was it part of the contrived plot to blow up DWH?

    Were BP's and Transocean's 24/7 manned shore control stations sleeping on the job? Then what about BP-operated Nakika platform? Were they sleeping on the job too? Hardly. If you are contriving to blow up your own rig, you too would make a conscious effort to avoid being mentioned in any document that could be construed as a scripted plan, just in case it falls into the wrong hands. The conspicuous absence of BP and Transocean is a major flaw in the plot since in any accident on the rig, the owner-operator (Transocean) and the Client (BP) would be the first to be notified. Thus in the scripted plot, everyone else was aware of the fire except BP and Transocean as if to distance themselves from the “ACCIDENT”.

    It is not known if Anchorman (a vessel captain working for Pacific Drilling) had “superman vision” to pierce through the darkness and steel walls, to be able to see and count all the personnel who had abandoned rig (jumping into the water or with life rafts). Yet for all his superman abilities, he was wrong on the 129 POB, “all had abandoned ship” and “drilling ship” information on his posting and could not pull off anchor 3 hours 42 minutes later. Why had all the investigations ignored Anchorman's eye-witness account of the incident?

    See Anchorman's eye witness account of DWH's explosion / fire 10milesaway.

    Assuming Anchorman was an independent observer minding his own business 10 miles away from DWH, what was his vessel doing at anchor 10 miles from DWH? Was his vessel one of the passing good Samaritans mentioned in the “scripted plot”? If his vessel was anchored so close to DWH, there would have been radio contact prior to the blowout (accident) since vessels in the vicinity of any platform or semi-sub rigs would need to identify themselves as part of the security measures against untoward accidents or unwelcome activities. As an experienced skipper, he should have known the difference between a drilling ship and a semi-sub rig. The fact that he could report the burning vessel as “Deepwater Horizon” meant that he knew. So why the deliberate “abandon ship” instead of “abandon rig”? Then again how did he know the accident happened at 21:45 CDT and all the personnel had abandoned “ship 10 minutes after the mayday”. Mayday call was sent out only at 21:52 CDT. An independent witness could not have known such precise details, not at that time and certainly not in the darkness 10 miles away.

    Anchorman posting on Gcaptain.com at 1:27 CDT (3 ½ hours later) wrote “I called Transocean when it happened and they were not aware, but the Coast Guard just called them, I updated them. So, I gave them my assessment.” In his first posting at 22:34 CDT, his exact words were “The Deepwater Horizon is on fire and the flames are 200 ft tall. All personnel have abandon ship.”

    This is most surprising. Did he call Transocean shortly after 21:45 CDT the time of the blowout or after the mayday call was sent out at 21:52 CDT? Both would indicate Anchorman had prior knowledge of the blowout before it happened. If D8 was notified at 22:04 CDT, why were BP and Transocean still in the dark about the “Accident” on their own rig more than 12 minutes after the mayday call was sent out? Surely offshore regulations in the US cannot be less stringent than 3rd world countries.

    Were BP and Transocean really sleeping on the job or was there a contrived plot to blow up DWH?

    Does the phrase “crude corruption and oily business” come to mind?

  • Story Photo

    Uploaded by ABCActionNews on Jul 23, 2010

    Chemical tests confirm two plumes of oil beneath the surface of the gulf came from that BP broken well.

  • Story Photo

    Uploaded by derrickhand301 on Sep 22, 2011

    Want FREE OILFIELD STICKERS & FREE SHIPPING?
    http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Froughneck.s3-us-west-1.amazonaws...

    USSR directional drilling gone bad when this drill bit surfaces in a nearby field!
    Be sure and check out http://www.drillingahead.com if you are oilfield.

  • Story Photo

    How do you watch this without crying like a baby? Loved it! Hope triumphs over all the evil bull@!$%# in the world.

    jd3422 4 months ago 30

  • Story Photo

    In September 2009, two time-series sediment trap and current meter moorings were deployed in the northern Gulf of Mexico to investigate biogenic fluxes settling to the seafloor (and larval recruitment) at two well-characterized and significant sites of combined deep-water coral and chemosynthetic tube-worm colonies (Fisher et al., 2007). Each of these traps, set just above the seabed and in water depths of 400-450m, have been collecting a new sample of settling material every two weeks since 11 September 2009 and will continue to do so until 2nd July 2010 when their last sample bottle will be rotated shut and the traps will await recovery as part of an already-funded field program (NOAA-MMS) scheduled for November. Serendipitously, however, these two traps are located just 32 nmiles to the NE and 81 nmiles to the WSW of the recent Deepwater Horizon incident and continuing oil release from the seafloor. Continuous monitoring by NOAA has shown that at least one of these two study sites became overlain by oil discharge at the ocean surface by the end of April and that both sites are now overlain by at least light to medium concentrations of hydrocarbons ± dispersant. What remains unestablished at this point, however, is what is happening at depth and what impacts there may be at the Gulf of Mexico seafloor and, specifically, its pristine and unique deepwater coral/ chemosynthetic tube-worm colonies. The purpose of this proposal, therefore, is two-fold.

  • Story Photo

    Please submit your favourite quotes of this disaster (that make you want to vomit blood, pun intended) to be included in the "Quotes of Shame - BP Gulf disaster". To be published on the 2nd anniversary of the disaster.  

  • Story Photo

    Uploaded by WalKnDude002 on Jun 27, 2010

    COREXIT is Eating Through Boats in the Gulf

    http://www.youtube.com/user/o0Levitikuz0o

    Corexit has started eating through boats in the Gulf . . . BP told the EPA "to stuff it" over the use of Corexit, which was found to be 4 times more toxic than the oil itself. BP is also in control of the U.S. Coast Guard which has threatened reporters with arrest that have gotten to close.

    Music Produced by: 2Deep - Just Another Day

    This video is for educational and news purposes only, which is protected under sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law.

    Kid with oil stuck on her Destin Beach Fl June 23rd 2010 Oil Rain Louisiana River Ridge Bp CNN almost all exxon valdez cleanup crew dead Kindra Arnesen Venice LA Needs to Evacuate BP Spill Environmnetal Disaster Fishing Industry health risks Chemical in South Carolina corexit dispersant toxic blocking blocks media access new orleans

  • Story Photo

    Real BP America
    The speaker from the USCG at one of the meetings said the same thing David said. He actually asked me would I rather have seen no Corexit being sprayed and dealt with the consequences. I said a firm YES! At least then we could have dealt with it out in the open and gotten rid of it. Then he went on about how he was exposed to Agent Orange in Vietnam and that this stuff was nothing compared to that. At that point, I realized talking to them anymore was pointless :-(

    Tuesday at 10:26am · Like · 1

  • Story Photo

    Tens of billions at stake in BP oil spill trial

    By Mira Oberman (AFP) – 11 hours ago

    CHICAGO — Tens of billions of dollars will be at stake when BP heads to a US court this month to determine how much it owes for the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill and how much it can shift to subcontractors.

    Several government probes have castigated BP, rig operator Transocean and Halliburton -- which was responsible for the runaway well's faulty cement job -- for cutting corners and missing warning signs that could have prevented the disaster.

  • Story Photo

    An undated email with the heading Case#497499 which appeared to have originated from District 8 (DR) to unknown recipients; Info: BT UNCLAS //N16130// Period : 200913Z Apr 10 -051521Z May 10 (04:13CDT 20 Apr-11:21CDT May 5).

    inadvertently included transcripts of a post blowout SAR blueprint. Initially, the 72 itemised entries (in chronological order numbered from A to BT), was thought to be part of the event log of the actual SAR operations carried out at site. One keen investigator however, pointed out the time differences and the discrepancies in some key details.

    The “5 hours 57 minutes schedule” started at 202357z (18:57 CDT) just 22 minutes after a discussion ensued about the pressure anomalies and negative-pressure test procedure. BP over-rode the suspicious results with an order to pump seawater into the kill line to confirm it was full and to pass a new negative-pressure test according to BP's criteria (see BP official log).

    Extracted from BP chronological record of events.

    18:35 Discussion ensued about pressure anomalies and negative-pressure test procedure. Seawater pumped into the kill line to confirm it was full. Opened kill line and bled 0.2 bbl to mini trip tank; flow stopped. Kill line opened and monitored for 30 minutes with no flow. At 19:55:00 hours, the negative-pressure test was concluded and considered a good test.

    With that “pesky obstacle to the planned blowout” out of the way, the perpetrators to the crime went ahead to finalize the SAR operation that was to follow the “accident”. They wanted the blowout to appear like an accident. At the same time they needed to control and contain the chaotic aftermath. They wanted their cake and eat it as well. With a well coordinated SAR ops, they could come out of the “field crew negligent accidental disaster” smelling like roses.

    Item A (CIC notification & DSC) with a time of 202357Z (18:57 CDT) eeriely translates to 21:57 CDT by adding 3 hours to 202357Z. It was also the time when the DWH master announced the activation of the EDS at 21:56 CDT (within the minute). The blowout was carefully orchestrated to occur at 21:45 CDT and the mayday distress call to follow 7 minutes later at 21:52 CDT. The first blogger (anchorman at Gcaptain.com) to announce the DWH accident posted at 22:34 (37 minutes after 21:57 CDT or 49 minutes after the blowout at 21:45 CDT).

    Extracted from BP chronological record of events.

    At 17:17 CDT Mud offloading from DWH mud pits to M/V Damon Bankston ceased. Mudlogger not notified.

    17:2717:52 CDT Drill pipe pressure reduced from 1,205 psi to 0 psi by bleeding off 15 bbls to 23 bbls of fluid to the cement unit. Rig crew and well site leader discussed negative-pressure test procedure. Well-site leader stated that the negative-pressure test needed to be done on the kill line in accordance with the BP plan submitted to MMS.

    Why the obsession with timing accuracy to the minute on key controlling events and the need for coded numbers in the planned explosion? Everyone involved in any covert operation of this scale, need to know their “play” at the correct time once the count down begins. There can be no mistake. The timing can easily be confirmed by their coded numbered sequence. Delays are shifted in hours or days but the minute after the hour remained the same. Otherwise, unintended casualties from confused timing and early triggers can result in a real accident and possibly give the game away. Unlike Hollywood movies, the staged disaster can turn horribly ugly and there can be no rehearsals in the real sense.

    For more examples see Kollmann's article on Natural or Accidental Disasters timed to happen.

    The countdown for this disaster started at 07:00 am on April 20, 2010 once Halliburton's well experts on board DWH believed the well was unstable and ready to blow. The CBL tests would have confirmed their expert opinion. But the test results would also put a stop to the planned blowout. With millions of dollars and 126 lives at stake, any responsible company would have stopped their rush to abandon the completed well and perform the CBL tests. If the cementing and seals were defective as BP was repeatedly told, there were more reasons to perform the CBL log, if BP had any intention of reusing this well for production.

    "Halliburton and BP knew weeks before the fatal explosion of the Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico that the cement mixture they planned to use to seal the bottom of the well was unstable but still went ahead with the job, the presidential commission investigating the accident said on Thursday.

    In the first official finding of responsibility for the blowout, which killed 11 workers and led to the largest offshore oil spill in American history, the commission staff determined that Halliburton had conducted three laboratory tests that indicated that the cement mixture did not meet industry standards.

    The result of at least one of those tests was given on March 8 to BP, which failed to act upon it, the panel's lead investigator, Fred H. Bartlit Jr., said in a letter delivered to the commissioners on Thursday." - The New York Times : Firms Knew of Cement Flaws Before Spill, Panel Says

    Obviously after a long night deliberation, BP's office in Houston gave their important decision early in the morning of 20 April to their company man onboard DWH. Contrary to news carried by the mainstream media, BP did not discussed the running of the cement bond log (CBL) during morning operations call (at 7:30 am) with the service providers before cancelling the CBL tests. That decision was already made by BP's HQ. BP's company man merely executed his immediate boss's order at 7:00am on April 20, 30 minutes before the morning operations call.

    On closer inspection, the itemized scripts unmistakeably described actions to be taken after the explosion had engulfed the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) in flames. The actual SAR ops carried out in the aftermath of the “accident” followed the prepared scripts to the letter except for certain unforeseeable items. Exhibit 1 gives the complete 4 page document.  

    For exhibit 1: click on link below

    http://grandelander.newsvine.com/_news/2012/02/15/10412123-exhibit-1-bps-post-blowout-sar-log-period-0413-cdt-20-apr-1121cdt-may-5

    To be continued.....

    Continue reading this entryContinue reading this entry ...

  • Gold in free fall - 20% down from high – September 26 2011 at 06:21pm

    The gold price is in free fall and only another major global crisis will stop its descent.

    After falling 11% last week, the precious yellow metal dropped 7.5% on Monday - its steepest one-day fall in five years - bringing the gold price down 20% from its all time high of US$1,920.30 an ounce in early September.

    This makes this month gold's worst month in three years.

    By late afternoon, the precious metal had lost almost US$50 from the US$1,641.39 it was quoted at the JSE's close on Friday to trade at US$1,591.50 - some US$328.80 from its all time high.

    Many market watchers warned that a correction was coming and now they are saying the price is likely to bottom and level off before it starts to climb again.

    “Gold has certainly taken a dive - and could stumble further in the days immediately ahead - but I think we will see the yellow metal begin its comeback sooner rather than later, possible in the next few days,” said Jeffrey Nichols, managing director of American Precious Metals Advisors.

    While the threat of another global economic meltdown has not been dismissed, the US dollar is the sweetheart of investors. In times such as these, the US dollar does then reign supreme. It should and it shall. 'Money' is finding its way to its ultimate safe harbour, and clearly that is not the euro and that is not gold,” said Dennis Gartman in Monday's Gartman Letter.

    Wasn't the financial world predicting the demise of the USD since the 2008 financial and economic crisis and collapse of Lehman Borthers? With an imminent Greece Default on the line, to be followed by successive PIGS defaults, US and its European allies controlled by the cabal at their wits' end with their backs to the corner. Was this report timed for release on September 26 2011 for financial gains? The numbers 26, 11 and month September seem to be appearing in many suspected inside jobs or planned disasters. Are these numbers accidental or timed as in setting one's alarm clock?

    Cabal resorting to desperate tactics as they try to prevent reboot of financial system

    There are many signs available in both the corporate propaganda media and the people based independent media that some sort of end-game crisis is approaching for the criminal cabal in charge of the G7 countries and their shrinking coterie of slave states. With the Pentagon and the Russian military aligned against the cabal, their downfall is close. For that very reason the cabalists are attempting to stage some sort of game changing atrocity, probably in either the US or Europe. ~ Benjamin Fulford.

    Is the old financial world long dominated by the cabalists at the brink of collapse? A world war (WWIII) involving the major creditor countries would solve the headaches they are having right now. It is not they haven't not tried. The Bush-Dick Cheney Administration had been trying to ignite a full blown world war after faking the 911 (Bush's Pearl Harbor) attack and blaming it on the Saudi patsies. Incidentally, the first plane crashed into Tower One at 8:46 am on American Airline flight 11. United Airline Flight 175 crashed into Tower 2 at 9:03 am, 17 minutes later. American Airline Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon (5) at 9:37am or 51 minutes after the first crash or 34 (17x2) minutes after the 2nd. Two as in double 7. A fourth (4) flight, United Airlines Flight 93, under the control of four (4) hijackers, crashed near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, southeast of Pittsburgh, at 10:03 a.m; exactly 1 hour after Tower 2.

    Japan's worst nuclear-tsunami-quake (3 as in triple) environmental disaster struck on 3-11-11 at 14:46 JST (05:46 UTC) or amazingly, 11-3-11 at 00:00:46 EST. The magnitude of the quake was 9 approx 70 km (or 43 miles which numerologically adds to 7) east of the Oshika Peninsula of Tōhoku. This disaster was dubbed Japan's 311, 10 years after 911. Was Japan's 311 timed to occur exactly 46 minutes after the hour as the 1st plane did?

    If you think these are just coincidences, look at 3 other earthquakes suspected to have been triggered.

    The 2003 Bam earthquake (1226) was a major earthquake that struck Bam and the surrounding Kerman province of southeastern Iran at 1:56AM UTC (5:26AM Iran Standard Time) on Friday, December 26, 2003. The most widely accepted estimate for the magnitude of the earthquake is a moment magnitude (Mw) of 6.6; estimated by the United States Geological Survey. The shallow earthquake (10 km) was particularly destructive, with the death toll amounting to 26,271 people and injuring an additional 30,000. - wikipedia.

    The 2006 Taiwan major earthquake (1226) occurred 90 km (55 miles) SSE of Kao-hsiung, Taiwan and 795 km (495 miles) N of Manila, Philippines at 6:26 AM MDT, Dec 26, 2006 (8:26 PM local time in Taiwan). Depth: 10 km. USGS public info.

    Both the 2003 Iran and 2006 Taiwan quakes were timed to destruct at precisely 26 minutes after the hour, exactly 3 years apart. The 2004 Indonesia quake which occurred 1 year after the Iran quake, had a disputable magnitude of 9.1 to 9.3 . BK Lim ( Bush lied on USS-San-Francisco-Accident) tied the 2005 January 8, 11:43 GT San Fran accident to the 2004 December 26 quake which happened at 10:58 GT, 13 days earlier.

    The 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake was an undersea megathrust earthquake that occurred at 00:58:53 UTC on Sunday, December 26, 2004, with an epicentre off the west coast of Sumatra,Indonesia. The quake itself is known by the scientific community as the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake.[3][4]  - wikipedia

    Compare this with the timed events on the Macondo BP Blowout (20100420 Bp-Oil-Spill-DWH Timeline).

    18-Apr-2010 20:58 (8:58pm)

    Partial lab test results, a new OptiCem™ model report (using seven inline centralizers) and Halliburton’s cementing recommended procedure for the Macondo well cement job were provided to BP and Halliburton staff. [Complete lab test results on planned slurry design not provided to BP before job was pumped.]

    Email from Halliburton inhouse cementing engineer to BP and Halliburton staff

    (same minute as 2004 quake)

    20-Apr 2010 (21:46) 9:46 pm

    ~21:46 hours—Gas hissing noise heard and high-pressure gas discharged from MGS vents towards deck.

    Real-time data Interviews MBI testimony

    (same minute as 911, Japan quake)

    20-Apr 2010 (22:00) 10:00 pm

    Explosion and Fire

    Transfer of 115 personnel, including 17 injured, to M/V Damon Bankston. 11 people were determined to be missing, and search and rescue activities ensued. U.S. Coast Guard arrived on-site at 23:22 hours.

    MBI testimony

    (coastguard arrival same as the minute DWH sank suddenly)

    22 Apr 2010 10:22

    Reported 2nd Explosion underwater. Deepwater Horizon sank.

    Unified Command

    Were all these events perfectly timed?

    The chance of 3 independent events happening within the same minute of the hour is 1: 216,000. At 8:46 am 1st plane crashed into Tower 1 on 911, Japan's 311 struck on 3-11-11 at 14:46 JST and the “high-pressure gas discharged from MGS vents towards deck” (a mistake?) at 9:46 pm. With astronomical odds like these, it would be a better bet to place your money on a “central command” behind the planning of all these disasters.

    The chance of 3 independent quakes (2003 Iran, 2004 Indonesia, 2006 Taiwan) happening on the same day of the year is 1: 48,627,125. The chance of 2 independent quakes (2003 Iran, 2006 Taiwan) happening on the same day of the year within same minute of the hour is 1:479,610,000.

    Compare the 2004 December 26 and a later quake on 2005 March 28 at around the same epicentre offshore Sumatra. You get the picture between a naturally occurring disaster and a triggered one.

    An excellent write up by Arjuna on Nuclear bomb caused the 12-26-04 Asian tsunami .

    Sumatra Quake: 28 March 2005

    Magnitude_8.7_earthquake_hits_Northern_Sumatra,_Indonesia

    A magnitude 8.7 earthquake has been reported in northern Sumatra, Indonesia by the U.S. Geological Survey (originally an 8.2 magnitude at 2:37 ET (7:37 GMT) the USGS reclassified it to an 8.7 magnitude). Government spokesman Agus Mendrova reported more than 290 deaths on the island of Nias. Hundreds of others were reported trapped in collapsed buildings, including structures weakened by the December 26th earthquake.

    A destructive wave was intially feared and many nations issued tsunami warnings. After the quake a USGS instrument near the Cocos Islands recorded a tsunami type wave which the USGS classified as "small." Tsunami warnings were later withdrawn.

    The quake occurred at 11:09 ET (16:09 GMT), and is considered a "great" earthquake, the largest of seven grades. This earthquake is also classified as a "shallow" earthquake, occurring within the top 50 kilometres of the Earth's crust. Shallow earthquakes are more likely to cause a tsunami, because as the lower within the surface the earthquake occurs, the less warping of the ocean floor occurs. This earthquake was a thrust quake; the December 26th Indian Ocean quake was considered a megathrust quake.

    Giant tsunami waves (>10m) cannot result from chaotic mass displacement of water. A high school physics experiment in creative and destructive wave motion, can prove this. Giant tsunami waves are created from well-timed creative wave sequence. “Destructive waveforms from chaotic mass displacement” is the norm.

    To create mega-tsunami, you cannot use HAARP or a single large nuclear explosion since there will always be random destuctive interference waves. You need carefully timed sequence of explosions. You can demolish a building with a single blast but the demolition will be unpredictably chaotic. You have modern controlled demolition experts for the job. I believe the 2004 Indonesian and 2011 Japan mega tsunamis were initiated by well-calculated controlled sequence of explosions to take advantage of a quake-prone situation. This was confirmed by the 8.7 mag quake on 28 March 2005 (3 months later) at approximately the same location as the 1226 Sumatra Quake on 26 December 2004.

    There is no financial benefit to a disaster you cannot time and control. The windfalls are obvious if you can accurately predict the time of these disasters. It is like rigging the roulette table. Similarly a financial tsunami can only be generated by a series of well-timed controlled (not chaotic accidental) events and disasters.

    What did GoldmanSachs know before the BP Blowout, to have sold 44% of its BP stock 3 weeks before? Tony Hayward sold 1/3 of his BP shares 1 week earlier. So did four other BP directors. What did these priviledged few know? Should those who profitted from through planned disasters or inside jobs, not be prosecuted?

    http://www.dailypaul.com/136466/goldman-sachs-sold-44-of-its-bp-stock-three-weeks-before-the-oil-rig-disaster

    www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/BP-chief-Tony-Hayward-sold-shares-weeks-before-oil-spill

    Continue reading this entryContinue reading this entry ...

  • Story Photo

    Uploaded by exposedeceivers on Mar 24, 2010

    Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former Director of Studies at the U.S. Army War College, on audio. The video details evidence on why it is 100% certain that Israel did 9/11 and the official story is a pack of lies.

    To learn more about the conspiracy facts of 9/11, see:

    http://www.takeourworldback.com/itwasntmuslims.htm

    http://www.takeourworldback.com/911realitydeniers.htm

    http://www.takeourworldback.com/dancingisraelisfbireport.htm

    http://www.takeourworldback.com/zitterpropaganda.htm

    The audio may be downloaded from:

    http://www.archive.org/details/TheLibertyHour-WithDr.AlanSabrosky

    An article by Dr. Sabrosky on 9/11 is available at:

    http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2009/09/10/treason-betrayal-and-deceit-the-road...

    His article of March 2010 entitled Zionism Unmasked: The Dark Face of Jewish Nationalism, discussed in the audio with Mark Glenn and Phil Tourney, is at:

    http://gerontios48.wordpress.com/2010/03/09/zionism-unmasked-the-dark-face-of...
    Category:

  • Story Photo

    Uploaded by OilFlorida on Aug 20, 2010

    Gulf Oil Spill and Seafood Safety Government Panel, House Committee Energy & Commerce, Energy and Environment, August 19, 2010:

    Edward Markey (D-MA), Subcommittee Chairman

    Bill Lehr, Senior Scientist National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin., Response and Restoration.

  • Story Photo

    Let us now summarize the evidence we have that the 311 tsunami and nuclear disaster were a deliberate attack and murder of 20,000 people planned and executed by the Khazarian Satanists.

    First of all, according to Democratic Party of Japan and other sources U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell met DPJ power broker Ichiro Ozawa on March 9th, 2011 and offered him the rights to Zeolite in Fukushima Prefecture if he would stop his plans to unseat then Prime Minister (and North Korean agent) Naoto Kan. Zeolite is now being used to clean up radioactive waste in Fukushima. Campbell claimed to be representing J. Rockefeller.

    Another piece of evidence is the fact that the stock price of Higashi Nihon House, a maker of discount housing in Northern Japan, rose 40% on March 10th, one day before the attack. An insider trading investigation has begun and the investors are being tracked down.

    Then there were local news reports dating to January, 2011, that the deep sea drilling vessel Chikyu Maru was systematically drilling holes at what became the exact epicenters of the quakes.

    There was a 15-man team of Japan Self-Defense Force technicians who were involved in placing nuclear devices into the drill holes. These technicians were told it was for “tests.” After the nukes were set off to trigger the tsunami, 14 of these technicians were murdered. The one surviving team member was sheltered by Pastor Paulo Izumi of the Tachikawa Christian Church in Tokyo. Based on details provided by this SDF technician, Paulo wrote up the details of how the tsunami was artificially created in two books published by Hikaruland Press. The latest, entitled “The Shocking Truth of Why Japan was Attacked with an Artificial Earthquake on 311,” was published in February, 2012. Izumi has also published evidence of a fake Armageddon planned by the perpetrators of this attack. The Self-Defense Force officer is now being sheltered by a Christian group in the US and has been debriefed by agency white hats.

    There is also plenty of evidence that the Israeli company Magna B.S.P. which was in charge of “security” at the Fukushima nuclear plant, actually blew up the plants with micro-nukes. Then of course is the recorded phone call by Benjamin Netanyahu to Naoto Kan after March 11, 2011 in which he threatened to blow up all of Japan’s nuclear plants. Magna BSP was in charge of security at all of these plants.

    The Fukushima nuclear complex was built by General Electric, a company controlled by J. Rockefeller and other cabalists via a web of so-called “charitable foundations.”

    People in Japan who were involved in the entire Fukushima nuclear and tsunami terror attack include Ichiro Ozawa, Naoto Kan and Tokyo Electric Power managers. They will be brought to justice.

    The weapons used in the attack were created with fuel taken from a nuclear warhead stolen from the Russian submarine Kursk. Paul Laine from Pentagon Military intelligence confirmed that four nuclear warheads were stolen from the Kursk when it “sank” in August of 2000. An MI6 agent using the name Richard Sorge also informed the Japanese police in 2010 that a nuclear warhead had been smuggled into Japan via Okinawa and was located in a property in Hinode Town, in Western Tokyo owned by former Prime Minister and senior North Korean Agent Yasuhiro Nakasone. The agent later informed the police the weapon had been smuggled into the headquarters of the General Association of North Korean Residents of Japan.

  • Feb. 13 (Bloomberg) -- Transocean Ltd., owner of the rig that exploded before the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history in 2010, sought to force a BP Plc manager to explain what occurred at the well prior to the blowout.

    Transocean asked the U.S. District Court in New Orleans to compel Donald Vidrine to testify. He was BP’s well site leader on the Deepwater Horizon rig when the Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico exploded. Vidrine has cited medical-related problems for refusing to testify, in person or in writing, Transocean’s lawyers said in a court filing yesterday.

    Vidrine “is a key source of information regarding critical events and operations that occurred immediately prior to the blowout,” Transocean said. “Mr. Vidrine’s medical issues do not provide a legal basis for his refusal to testify.”

  • Story Photo

    Uploaded by KeepItTrillBlog on Jun 4, 2010

    Physics professor and author Michio Kaku speaks about the idea of nuking the Gulf oil well leak, on Keith Olbermann's show, 6-03-2010.

  • Story Photo

    But now in the Gulf, in the midst of a switchover process that calls for drastic depopulation, motive clearly enters the picture. What better way to move the project forward? Whatever toxic brew they cook up in the Gulf will be spread by the Gulf Stream all over the Atlantic Ocean and coastal areas, and into the global current system. And when the hurricanes begin, which they soon will, the toxic brew will be sprayed all over the Gulf region, making large areas of the coastal states, and probably all of Florida, uninhabitable and toxic to crops and creatures.

    And it is indeed a toxic brew. They tapped into a major migration channel of abiotic oil, deep down at the level where volcanos originate, and all kinds of toxic gases are being released along with the oil, under enormous pressure that cannot be contained and is leaking out from many places in the Gulf. And in case that's not toxic enough, they're adding all that Corexit, a neuro toxin banned in Europe because of bitter experience with its toxicity.

    None of this can be chalked up to accident. The geological properties of the area, and the nature of the deep oil system, were well known to the experts. The Gulf is one of the oldest and most studied drilling areas in the world. Any legitimate attempt to tap into that deep oil system would have called for better-than- usual safety measures, not systematically shoddy safety measures. Deep Water Horizon was an accident meant to happen, and the witnesses have been scared into silence.

  • Story Photo

    BP's 3 leaks on a single riser were not only ridiculous but impossible.

    BP claimed the first leak(1) was at the kink of the riser (bent riser) on top of the 70ft blowout preventer (BOP). BP admitted that most of the oil was gushing out into the Gulf was from the secondary leak (2). The smaller gas leak at well A could not be capped until the real rogue well (BE) aka leak(2) was sealed or bottom-killed 18,000 ft bsl (reported since July 2010).

    The third leak (3) was a just puny gas leak flowing out of the open end of a drill pipe. Figure 165-0 gives the various schematic illustration of the 3 leak points on the riser, based on BP sourced information. Besides adding the labels for clarity, the only other item added to figure 165-0a was the NW SE fault line. This fault line, as we shall see in later articles, was the critical factor in the shallow gas problems encountered in all the 3 wells.

    Simple logic dictates that it was physically impossible for these 3 leaks to occur on a single riser from a single blowout. Certainly not the way BP explained it. Figure 157 in Another Physical Impossibility 2 Leaks On The Broken Riser gave some of the discrepancies noted on Leak(1) and Leak(2) as early as Aug 2010. Note that leak(3) was allegedly sealed by capping the open ended drill pipe. Later articles will also show how BP tried to buy time by going through the charade of junk shot kill, top kill, top caps and giant domes etc, while the teams on site set up another BOP and reattached the Bent Riser at well A, to start the “dog & pony show” from mid May of 2010 onwards.

    In addition to the 6 discrepancies found in comparing leaks (1) and (2) in figure 157, here are a few more:

    The open ended 5½ inch drill pipe at leak(3) is of different physical dimension from the pipe (casing) at leak(2) and the Bent Riser on top of the BOP at leak(1). See the marked differences in figures 165-1b and 165-2.

  • At leak(3) the 5½ inch drill pipe should have been inside the 21 inch main riser pipe with the attached Choke, Kill, booster and hydraulic supply lines. It is physically impossible to explain how a long “naked” drill-pipe could have been stripped off its 21-inch Riser pipe casing at the mid-section of the riser string. More impossible still was the fact that it was sticking vertically out of the seabed with the weak gas plume. The naked standing drill-pipe could only be possible if it was ejected from the blown well itself.

  • If the riser was carrying the same drill pipe string (5000 ft long), how did the pipe at leak(2) suddenly become several times larger than the drill pipe shown at leak(3), immediately after the blowout?

  • In comparison with the other broken segments of the riser string lying on the seafloor, why was leak(2) so special and different if it was also broken from the same riser string? Fact: leak(2) could not possibly be from the same riser string.

  • BP claimed that leak(3) was sealed by capping the drill pipe. Why couldn't the drill-pipe within the riser at leak(2) be similarly capped? There were many reasons they couldn't. The main reason? Leak(2) was the blown crater of well no. 3 (well BE) and not the broken riser carrying the drill-pipe within.

  • Leak(3) was undeniably an open ended disconnected pipe just as leak(2) was. There could only be one severed open end in the riser segment still connected to the BOP. It can only be leak(2) or leak(3) and not both.

  • How did the oil “jump” across leak (3) and continue to flow to leak (2) as illustrated in 165-0a and b?

  • The later illustration (165-0c) corrected the leak(3) anomaly by placing it after leak(2). Only problem then, how do you explain the “open ended pipe” at leak(2)?

  • Figure 165-2 and BP's investigation report confirm that there were two 5½ inch drill-pipes within the Bent Riser. This means that the drill-pipe string within the riser was already disjointed near the BOP. How could oil/gas flow through a disjointed drill-pipe to leak out at leak(3) more than 500ft from the BOP?

  • The black oil plume at leak (2) was obviously more voluminous than the lighter orange-brown gas leak at leak(3) or leak(1). The color of the oil / gas plumes is consistent with the differences in the flow rate and volume noted in all the three leaks. Fact: the leaks are from different ground sources.

  • The videos show that the riser string was completely severed at several points and all the severed sections showed no gas/oil leaks. If Leak(1) was on the same riser string as leak(2) and leak(3) why was it not showing any oil/gas leaks until after mid May 2010 (more than 20 days later).

  • The earliest video on 23 April 2010 clearly showed a steep sided blowout crater with no “surface” riser going into the crater. The oil spewing pipe at the base of the deep crater, had to originate from the well below. With no visible supply of oil (through the surface riser), the obvious oil supply had to be vertically beneath the crater. This further confirms that leak(2) was the blown third well (BE). See the close-up view at figure 165-5.

  • The bent riser on top of the BOP was not leaking at all in the early videos before BP publicly broadcast leak (1) in mid May (20 days later). If leak(1) at well A was the primary leak, it does not make sense to show the secondary leak(2) first. Not unless the primary leak(1) at well was non-existent and had to be set up first?

  • Setting up well A as the “primary leaking well” was not in the original plan. It was a backup plan. This explains the more than 20 days media blackout on the supposedly primary leak(1).

  • The riser piping could not have bent and twisted like a pretzel and yet still remained intact, as the astonished experienced driller from Drilling Ahead believed (more of this later).

  • The riser string did in fact break at several places as seen in figures 165-1a and 1b. Again how could oil flow through these “severed discontinuities” in the riser? Fact: There was no oil flow as the ROV inspections showed.

  • The clearest evidence is the photo-shot of the vertically standing riser section (speared into the seabed). There was no oil spill emanating from it or in its vicinity. This clearly refutes the ridiculous official story that a neutrally buoyant riser with floats could dig itself beneath the seabed (like a buried pipeline) only to spew out the oil hundreds of feet away. Physics of Impossibility does not get more ridiculous than that.

  • If the well was already gushing out oil from the instance of the first blowout on 20 April 2010 (reported by BP to fuel the rig fire) why was there no immediate oil spewing out of the broken riser as it was sinking. The rig fire was in fact fed by more than 700,000 gallons (60% of max capacity) of diesel stored onboard the rig. Why was more than 60% of fuel still onboard the rig at the end of its long 3 months drilling campaign? Why was BP so certain free flowing crude from the well was fueling the rig fire without evidence?

  • It is now confirmed (see figure 165-3) that it took less than 16 seconds to fully bend from an upright (slightly inclined) position. The DWH (falsely reported as having sunk at 10:22 CDT) could not have sunk 5000ft to the sea bottom within a minute. Thus the riser pipe had to be deliberately broken near to the BOP; possibly less than 1000ft. Otherwise how could a marine riser which could withstand 80 mph Hurricane Ida, break at mid-section in very calm water? A shorter break segment from the BOP could also explain the extremely fast bending event. Now the question is how did the riser break? Subterfuge comes to mind.

  • The fact that there was no visible oil gushing out of the broken end of the riser as it sank, further confirms that the base plug at the bottom of the well had not yet breached completely (more of this in later articles) at 10:22 CDT 22 April, 2010.

  • If this was the case, why did BP, blog forums and the coast guards repeatedly stressed that “oil from the reservoir was freely flowing into the rig through the riser and feeding the intense fire on the burning rig”? Were they speculating or preparing the public for the anticipated massive oil spill that was planned but yet to happen? Again this shows that blowing up and burning the rig just for insurance claims were not the main objectives. BP's apologists have frequently stressed that this objective was pointless and they were right. The oil spill was their main objective and a blowout without the spill is like having dinner without the main course. It would be less than fulfilling especially after years of elaborate planning.

  • Rov inspection of the BOP and the seafloor around the well (BE) on 22 April 2010, showed no signs of gas plumes, blow holes or oil emanating from the well head. That would explain why the Bent Riser did not have any gas leaks on 22 April where most of the doctored-relooped footage were shown. Then 20 days later, BP showed the same Bent Riser with the orange-brown gas plume (at well A). If BP could turn on and off the gas leaks, why should there be a massive oil spill in the first place? Alternatively, BP switched wells. That is pretty obvious, is it not?

  • Even if the riser was still intact (despite the twists and bends), how could the “supposedly long riser string” plant itself inside a deep (at least 5m) crater without disturbing the overlying cemented drilling mud and sediment?

  • BP's schematics showed less than 4,000 ft of riser. What happened to the remaining 1,000 ft? Further the 700odd ft segment from well A to well BE (crater) has a totally different degree of twisting and bends from the next 3,000 ft segment. A falling elongated but uniform body like the riser does not twist and bend midway in calm water. The bottom section had to break away first and the hanging riser dropped almost vertically under its own weight as depicted in the diagrammatic illustration of BP's deepwater horizon blowout published on 30 July 2010. Consequently, the “speared location” would be centred near to its original base (or well). This again point to the location of the third well (BE) which was fraudulently depicted as leak(2) on a fallen riser. With so many irrefutable evidence, leak(2) cannot be just a secondary leak on the riser but the broken well itself.

  • There are many more flaws in BP’s official story but we shall reserve them for the coming articles. But how could entire teams of federal regulators and investigators, all failed to recognize and investigate into the flaws of BP’s official version of the disaster? Willful Blindness and Complicity come to mind. 

    You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time. ~ Abraham Lincoln

    back to section 1

    (http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2012/02/10/10376634-bps-deception-in-the-gulf-part-1-the-farcical-3-leaks-on-the-broken-riser-story)

  • Story Photo
    • BK Lim et al (first drafted in June 2010, revised 29 Jan 2012)

    To keep this article short, we posted these figures earlier at the following links:

    Figure 165-3 BP doctored relooped video to make-believe BOP was still intact at 3rd well after 2nd blowout

    Figure 165-4 BP's latest PR twist: DWH blowout disaster downgraded into an underwater pipeline burst

    Figure 165-5 Undoctored videos confirm oil gushing blown crater was well#3 and not 2nd leak on the riser

    Figure 165-5a Doctored videos of the same blown crater confirm elaborate deception

    Figure 165-6 Even DNV was fooled by the fake relooped videos after the 22 April explosion.

    (figures 165-0, 165-1b and 165-2 are given in the next posting)

    Of all the lies that came out of the Gulf disaster, the most preposterous has been the 3 leaks on the riser story. Figure 165-0a to 165-0c were the first few schematic illustrations of BP’s blowout incident. They were so embarrassingly stupid and logic defying, most experts believed the schematics were deliberately drawn by cartoonists to confuse the average Joe Public. The patchwork of realities resembled a makeshift car hastily assembled from parts of different size vehicles. Obviously a mini car body does not match the oversize truck tires. It is obvious the 5½ inch drill pipe at leak(3) cannot be the same 21inch diameter riser (actually a well casing) at leak(2). Yet the world's technical experts willfully overlooked this fundamental discrepancy and allowed the criminals to get away with murders. And America, the world's greatest nation shouting human rights abuses all over the world, allowed this hideous crime of mass destruction in its own backyard to go unpunished? In China, the corporate criminals responsible for this environmental carnage would have been executed instead of having their lives back. Can the 11 dead crewmen, their young families and thousands of Gulf victims who suffered numerous medical problems from the toxic contaminated Gulf waters and corexit sprayed on them, ever have their lives back?

    Surely the world's most technologically advanced country could not have been so easily fooled by this “3 wells & 3 leaks on a single riser” fairy tale (concocted Beyond Phantasm). Besides the many controversial circumstances surrounding the sinking of the burning rig (DWH) and the sudden breaking of the super-strong riser in calm water, how could a third open-ended leak (3) be even possible beyond the completely severed riser at the second leak (2)? See fig165-0c. Leak(2) has to be the blown crater of well no.#3 as illustrated in many of our previous articles and irrefutably shown in Figure 165-5 with the right coordinates in the few undoctored videos.

    When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.” S Homes.

    Since June 2010, we have illustrated many physics of impossibilities concocted by BP. Two years later, it seems the world has not awaken from its ignorantly blissful slumber. This disaster is more than just a disastrous mega oil spill. If the world's foremost scientists and investigators cannot figure out the many fundamental flaws in the simple “3 leaks-3 wells” fairy tale, how can there be any hope of ever solving problems beyond kindergarten level? Forget the carbon tax, the ban on hazardous gas emission and just about any anti-pollution measures designed to improve the global environment. All these schemes have sinister undertones with profiting on mass miseries of others.

    In the Gulf disaster, you have the biggest environmental polluter in human history. The punishment for a crime of mass destruction that could have been averted, was just a slap on the wrist? If this is not the clearest proof of corruption at the highest level and biggest HSE (health, safety & environment) farce, then what is?

    It is clear the current political leaders had not been up to mark in dealing with this disaster. If their blinkered leadership cannot see beyond the deception in the Gulf, the only place they are are capable of leading to, is Hell. Do the American people really want to be sheepishly led down this road to hell? And world leaders follows obediently in tow.

    If we do not wake up and smell the Corexit now, pretty soon there would not be a planet to save at all.

    It was not the failure of safety regulations but the enforcement of regulations. The government admitted this much by sacking MMS's director and changing it to BOEMRE. It was not the failure of technology but the devious use of technology to cloak unfair business practices or safety farce at the very least. But would shrewd corporate criminals risk billions of investment dollars just to skimp on some daily operation expenses and safety devices? Just like the fairy tale of the 3 leaks, this was just the red herring. The oil industry will start on its decline just as the coal industry did, after its replacement by alternative cheaper and cleaner energy sources (The Future of Free Energy).

     

    Giant global oil corporations may not have the next 10 years to recover their mega billion dollar investments. With the writings on the wall and their failures to control (prevent) the advent of free energy, the oil oligarchs had to devise emergency exit schemes before oil independence becomes public knowledge. High crude oil prices cannot be manipulated too high or long enough to recoup their billions of investment dollars globally. They risk becoming economic dinosaurs.

    High oil prices depress global economic growth and hence non-sustainable for too long a period. Shallow, low cost production reservoirs are either not under their control or their reserves have already dwindled. The Middle East wars and conflicts are all about the control of cheap oil supplies. At low crude oil prices, they cannot recoup their high investment costs. Huge deep water oil reserves are just market hype. They are just too uneconomical for exploitation. But like the fake 134 billion US dollar bonds and 26 trillion US loans given out by the FED, mega oil spills could be leveraged as MIHOP environmental disasters for quick mega windfalls. More details in later articles.

    Figures 165-0 to 165-6 accurately depict how deep down the abyss the oil industry had sank into. How can we pretend that all is well with the oil industry? The 11 crewmen died not because they did not perform their job well. On the contrary, these men plus the previous drilling crew performed exceptionally well. Otherwise they could not have drilled through hell to reach the reservoir at 18,360 ft below sea level. They were on a “suicide mission” without being told that the nightmare well was supposed to blow once they had successfully reached the reservoir. It is time to put the records straight. As Edmund Burke said; “All that is needed for evil to succeed is that decent human beings do nothing”.

    The illustration of the 3 infamous leaks on a badly twisted riser, was designed to confuse and to twist public opinion to their advantage. Many experts in the industry wondered at the ludicrous illustration but no one dare to criticize big brother, BP. Below is one muffled, discussion from an astonished experienced driller at Drilling Ahead.

     

    Riser Problems?(http://www.drillingahead.com/forum/topics/transocean deepwater horizon 1#ixzz1k7tHXgvt)

    According to the Coast Guard and BP, oil is leaking from two spots along what is left of the riser system. Here's a schematic view: (figure 165-0b) dated 26 April 2010.

    Originally, the risers (represented by the blue line in the graphic above) were affixed to the blowout preventer on the seafloor, and extended 5,000 feet straight up to the "moon pool" of the Deepwater Horizon. When the drilling vessel sank, it took the riser piping and bent it around like a pretzel.

    The remnants of the riser system now follow a circuitous underwater route. According to BP, the risers extend from the wellhead up through the water column to about 1,500 feet above the seabed. Then the riser system buckles back down toward the seafloor. (Frankly, I'm astonished that it all held together as well as it has. It's a credit to the manufacturer, which I'll discuss below.)

    According to the Transocean website, the riser devices on the Deepwater Horizon were manufactured by VetcoGray, a division of General Electric Oil & Gas. The specific designation is a "HMF Class H, 21 inch outside diameter riser; 90 foot long joints with Choke & Kill, and booster and hydraulic supply lines."

    ~~~~end of quote~~~

    Why the pathetic 3 leaks on the broken riser excuse?

    If there were really 3 leaks on a single riser, BP could have easily reduced three into one controllable leak at the source by cutting the riser at the top of the blowout preventer (BOP). That was precisely what BP did at the end of May to install the LMRP (Lower Marine Riser Package) cap on 3 June 2010. But why wait for 40 days? Why would BP need to go through the charade of top kill, junk shots, hot hats and all that nonsense? Why wait for 87 days before shutting down the flow at well A on 15 July? Why was there no massive oil spill or gas leaks before 2200z (1700 CDT) 22 April 2010? See the pattern yet?

    BP's frauds and deception in the Gulf would have been exposed at the break of the disaster if they had not been so well coordinated and meticulously planned months beforehand. Official coverups could not have withstood the tsunami-force of massive public protests, even with forceful suppression. The pen is mightier than the sword. Deception is more effective in dissipating the focused energy of the masses. Once divided and confused with distorted truths, only can military force be effective in suppressing the sheepish masses to be culled. TPTB have been having lots of target practices in the third world countries and now it is time to use these tactics in their home crowd. Nothing happens by accident. Certainly not the BP's Gulf disaster which had been planned as early as 2007.

    The ROV inspections of the wellhead, marine riser and BOP in the immediate aftermath of the incident show that the mega oil spill could have been easily averted with several run-of-the-mill options. It was the sort of controllable rig blowout-fire situation the industry expects and routinely trained for. It could have been recovered safely without ending in a disastrous mega oil spill. James Cameron of the Titanic fame was quoted as saying “US shouldn't be relying on BP's underwater intel. Those morons don't know what they're doing!”. Really? Or was ingenuity behind the cloak of stupidity.

    The main reason for the deliberate blunders and delays in the recovery of the blowout and the oil spill, was to intentionally flood the Gulf with massive oil to cause market panic. No massive oil spill means no justification for spraying unprecedented massive amount of COREXIT. Bio-remediation was available and ready to be used. Yet millions of gallons of corexit had been stockpiled weeks before the mega spill occurred and surprisingly on standby to disperse on the first day itself. Yet there are those who still believe there was no vested business connection. The concerted media, political and industry deception onslaught was unmistakably deafening. Stupidity and global domination do not go hand in hand.

    The initial gas blowout (20 April 2010) which killed 11 drilling crew on the burning Deepwater Horizon rig, failed to unleash the massive oil spill as PLANNED. A detonated explosion within the well shortly after 2200z (1700 CDT) did. That triggered explosion induced a bottom hole blowout that unleashed the full power of the gushing oil from the Macondo reservoir. Period!

    Is it not a federal offense to lie so blatantly to the US Congress and American Public? Or is the system so screwed up, it is fashionable or even brilliant to get away with submitting doctored ROV videos to Congress? For the uninitiated, there were many accounts of BP committing perjury before and after Tony Hayward' congressional testimony. All ROV videos showing the still standing BOP with the Bent Riser (without the gas leak) from the 23 April till mid May 2010, were relooped footage recorded prior to the 22 April explosion shortly after 1700 CDT. Why? Because the BOP was already in pieces scattered over the seafloor after the 22 April bottom-well blowout. Again the doctored videos were deliberately ignored by investigators and mainstream media. Obvious, is it not?

    Continue: Part 1 The farcical 3 leaks on the broken riser story

  • (Reuters) - BP Plc won a court order keeping several potentially damaging emails out of a scheduled trial to determine responsibility for the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

    Wednesday's ruling by U.S. Magistrate Judge Sally Shushan in New Orleans came a day after U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier rejected the oil company's effort to keep evidence about settlements it had already reached out of the trial.

    The rulings came as Barbier prepares to preside on February 27 over a non-jury trial to assign blame for the April 20, 2010 explosion of the Deepwater Horizon rig, which killed 11 people and caused the largest offshore oil spill in U.S. history.

    Plaintiffs include individuals and businesses, represented by a plaintiffs' steering committee that had sought to introduce the email evidence, as well as states and the U.S. government.

    The main corporate defendants include BP, rig owner Transocean Ltd and Halliburton Co, which provided cementing services for the Macondo oil well. Anadarko Petroleum Corp, one of BP's partners in the well, is also involved in the trial.

    Shushan granted BP's request to exclude as hearsay several 2009 emails among Anadarko employees about tropical storm damage to another Transocean rig that had been under contract to BP.

    In one email, an Anadarko employee expressed disappointment that BP had not disclosed some information related to the damage, prompting another to respond: "Bummer. I'm amazed that they did not tell us about this."

    Shushan also granted BP's and Transocean's request to keep out a June 2010 email from Halliburton employee Ryan Haire questioning their reported findings regarding some tests, saying he had no personal knowledge of those findings.

    The judge also granted Halliburton's request to exclude an email from a BP geologist to a colleague in February 2010, offering "thanks for the @!$%#ty cement job."

    Halliburton contended that the email was no more than a casual, tasteless joke made by one friend to another. Shushan concluded that there was no showing that the email was a "business record" of the cement work that could be introduced into evidence.

    Barbier had on Tuesday ruled in Halliburton's favor on whether evidence of BP's settlements with Anadarko and other companies was admissible at trial.

    Halliburton had said such evidence could show the settling companies' potential bias in BP's favor, while BP had countered that they were irrelevant to establishing liability.

  • Story Photo

    Here in America, as a foreign entity you can kill 11 men, injure 17 more, cause unprecedented ecological and economical destruction to 4 states, destroy hundreds of thousands of animals, take over the media, science and regional healthcare, decimate cultures, chemically poison thousands of people, and leave a big fat mess behind, for the same cost as one bank’s government bail out, (Wells Fargo 2009).

    Heck, last year alone BP slammed a net profit of $25.7 billion. So much for the 2010 worry that BP might go into bankruptcy over the fiasco.

    And according to a UPI.com article, found here

    http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2012/02/05/Settlement-possible-in-BP-oil-spill-case/UPI-61971328459069/, state officials may actually be encouraging the idea, with the help of the DOJ and the administration.

  • Story Photo

    It's official: 2011 was a record-busting year in the oil industry, with the five largest companies -- BP, ExxonMobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, and Royal Dutch Shell -- reporting all-time-high profits of $137 billion. That's a 75 percent jump from the year before, even though the giants produced less oil than in 2010.

    It's the multinational way to go in a slumping economy: Get paid more for doing less.

  • Story Photo

    BP an­nounced today that its 2011 profit to­taled $26 bil­lion, a 114 per­cent jump from the year be­fore, when the com­pany’s “fail­ure of su­per­vi­sion and ac­count­abil­ity” caused the worst oil spill in U.S. his­tory. As the com­pany pre­pares for its up­com­ing crim­i­nal trial, let’s take a look at how BP has made out after the Deep­wa­ter Hori­zon dis­as­ter:

  • Story Photo

    Look at this important ROV video. It is a technique taken from the "Art of Mass Deception".

    How do you hide evidence by showing it?  

    Clue: Throughout the week we have been showing evidence of heading and orientation. When confused, try looking from a different perspective.  

  • On the day the Deepwater Horizon sank, BP officials warned in an internal memo that if the well was not protected by the blow-out preventer at the drill site, crude oil could burst into the Gulf of Mexico at a rate of 3.4 million gallons a day, an amount a million gallons higher than what the government later believed spilled daily from the site.

    The email conversation, which BP agreed to release Friday as part of federal court proceedings, suggests BP managers recognized the potential of the disaster in its early hours, and company officials sought to make sure that the model-developed information wasn't shared with outsiders. The emails also suggest BP was having heated discussions with Coast Guard officials over the potential of the oil spill.

  • Story Photo

    America is in trouble. This a planned disaster no doubt. We are looking at the greatest catastrophe to hit Mankind. ....And they can't fix it or won't fix it. 

    How do you bring the world's greatest Republic to its kness?

    Kindra: Does that make my people expendable?

     

  • 2010 April 23 around 1300hrs showing the BOP-Bent Riser after the DWH had sunken. Look at the heading which is 322 deg. it doesn't change even though the rov camera obviously changed. Video shows the same BOP-Bent Riser looking at a different angle. If the heading of 35 deg NE is to be trusted then the Bent Riser should be pointing towards NW. How can with a static BOP-Bent Riser? Again the answer is false heading (not at the time of actual recording). Another physics of impossibility or simply "faking" the rov view at that time. The Presidential Oil commission and Federal investigators left out in their official investigation. A case of incompetence or willful blindness or a cover-up?

  • Story Photo

    Santa Barbara cinematographer Mike deGruy died in a fiery helicopter crash Friday in New South Wales, Australia.

    According to KEYT, deGruy, 60, was in Australia to scout locations for an upcoming documentary project.

    The Age newspaper in Melbourne reported that deGruy and the helicopter’s pilot, fellow filmmaker Andrew Wight, were killed when their aircraft crashed and burst into flames during takeoff near Nowra on the south coast of New South Wales. Local authorities said both men died at the scene.

    The cause of the crash is under investigation.

    One of the films on which he worked was Deepwater Rising, which chronicled the aftermath of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Friend and fellow Santa Barbaran Harry Rabin, CEO of On the Wave Productions and the documentary’s cinematographer, spent two months on location with him for the project.

  • It appears high-level BP officials made a concerted effort to keep secret a completely legitimate spill estimate – based on a tested scientific model – and disclosed a completely unfounded, grossly inaccurate flow rate. Go figure.

    The series of decisions surrounding the “false estimate” episode are all neatly packaged in a damning email exchange between BP employees released in federal court in New Orleans on Friday (Jan. 27). The startling new evidence provides a glimpse inside what is shaping up to rank among the biggest, most flagrant corporate coverups in recent history. From a Jan. 27 Times-Picayune report:

    The April 22 email from Rob Marshall, BP’s subsea manager for the Gulf of Mexico, to deepwater project manager Gary Imm and corporate vice president Jonathan Sprague is an exhibit in the massive oil spill litigation slated for trial Feb. 27.

    Marshall advised Imm and Sprague that an expert named Alistair Johnston had a new model for how much oil might be spewing from the wellhead a mile below the surface and 50 miles from the Mississippi River delta. Johnston’s new estimate, Marshall wrote, was 82,000 barrels a day if the well has an open hole.

    The response from Imm suggests that BP and the Coast Guard were already butting heads over how much oil was coming out of the busted well – and that 82,000 barrels a day wasn’t a number BP wanted anyone to hear.

    “A number of people have been looking at this and we already have had difficult discussions with the USCG (Coast Guard) on the numbers,” Imm wrote back to Marshall and Sprague. “Please tell Alistair not to communicate to anyone on this.”

    So much for the “complete transparency” and cooperation BP pledged to embrace.

  • Story Photo

    Uploaded by CH3MTRAILS on Jul 22, 2010

    http://pindz.blogspot.com - http://annunaki.wz.cz
    KC-10 SPRAYING TOXIC CHEMTRAILS CANADA 2010 COCKPIT FOOTAGE CLOSE UP PROOF

  • Story Photo

    The many lies are, in themselves, probable cause to begin a Federal Grand Jury investigation of George W. Bush's role in 911. Bush should be compelled by subpoena and Federal Marshals to testify under oath before an independent Federal Grand Jury. The AA revelations demand it! Bush lies have the effect of covering up the truth, protecting the guilty and obstructing justice. The lies are an insult to the families of 911 victims, victims dishonored by the continuing cover-up! Bush's lies aggravate the crimes of mass murder, terrorism and high treason for which the penalty must surely be death.

    911 did not happen as we have been told. Bushco's 'official conspiracies theory' of 911 is full of holes. Flights 11 and 77 are essential ingredients in the 'official conspiracy theory' of 911. That AA claims that neither 11 nor 77 were in the air that day sinks Bush's theory.

    More importantly, however, it should get him an 'invitation' to appear before a Federal Grand Jury to answers charges that he betrayed his nation and waged war upon the people. Clearly –the official theory is a lie, an intentional cover-up. Cover-ups imply guilt! Otherwise –what is there to cover up? The official 'lie' goes like this:

  • In 2005 President Bush signed the Energy Policy Act, which retained the focus of Cheney's report, into law. It included what has become known as "the Halliburton loophole," which removed authority from the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate a potentially dangerous gas-drilling process invented by Halliburton.  

    These links, the fact that Cheney's former campaign press secretary Ann Womack-Colton has recently become BP's head of U.S. media relations, and the general pro-oil, anti-regulation atmosphere in the Bush years have not escaped the attention of the pundits. MSNBC's Chris Matthews highlighted the Halliburton-Cheney connection in an interview with Jay Leno on the BP spill. Frank Rich, in The New York Times, pointed out that the Interior Department degenerated into a "cesspool of corruption," under Bush and Cheney, and that the pair bequeathed Obama "a Minerals Management Service as broken as the Bush-Cheney FEMA exposed by Katrina."

  • Story Photo

    Uploaded by BakkenWatch on Nov 14, 2011

    Bakken Watch hired an independent lab to test the air quality on a remote farm in western North Dakota. The air sample canister was placed outside in the yard. The family says that they are sick, as well as livestock and other animals on the farm. The test reveals chemicals that should not be in the open air in such a remote location. There are many fracking operations in the immediate area of this farm. Viewer discretion is advised.

  • Story Photo
    • BK Lim et al (first drafted in June 2010, revised 29 Jan 2012)

    Why would BP spend more than 100 millions USD on PR media blitzkrieg to change public perception of the massive oil spill? Remember the famous doctored photos which BP admitted to?

    http://gizmodo.com/5592836/bp-photoshops-another-official-image-again-terribly

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2010/jul/23/bp-oil-spill-pictures

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/oil/7904221/BP-admits-it-Photoshopped-official-images-as-oil-spill-cut-and-paste-row-escalates.html

    2010 July 30- why-is-bps-macondo-blowout-so-disastrous-beyond-patch-up

    4 What you don’t see can be covered up.

    Perhaps the botched-up “photochop-chop” photos put up by BP was just a test. To see how keen the public eyes were in following BP’s clean up efforts. It would be hard to believe BP paid professionals for such a shoddy job. We should give BP more credit than that (remember the shares issues)? Let’s play dumb and the problems will go away.

    Many experts in the oil industry were surprised and questioned the rationality of capping the well when the relief wells were so close to achieving their “bottom kill” objectives. They could have installed the TOP CAP much earlier. This means that BP knew if the gushing well was completely shut at the top, the oil and gas would spread beneath the sea floor and gas seeps would start appearing. So the TOP CAP had to be placed just before the relief well was ready for the “magic show”. Hurricane Bonnie spoilt the show and the delay is already showing signs of stress (gas seeps).

    This could also mean that BP was getting less and less confident that the relief wells would work. The relief wells were held up as the last Trump card. If it fails in full (ROV) view of the concerned public throughout the world, BP’s shares would drop like a stone. There are good geological reasons why the chances of the relief wells’ success are less than 30%. But that would be in the next posting.

    So instead “of going on a public stage with a final trump card of 30% chance of success” and risking everything BP stands for, a magic show will be set up so that what ever happens, it will be a success. How?

    With a gushing well in full view, a successful bottom kill would show oil slowing down to eventually a tickle. With the cap on, it would be easier to manipulate the data. Thus botched-up photos were a test to check the keenness of the public eye. If the bottom kill fails, there is no independent monitor to prove it. BP could quickly pack and leave the site. Without ROVs’ video, the world is blind. Independent scientific researches later on could be disputed or controlled in post-recovery mopped up battle plan.

    The TOP CAP had to be installed and the integrity pressure tests used as an excuse to completely shut down the flow. There is no need to prove the well is leaking. It is already a fact. David Copperfield could not have performed better.

    ~~~end of quote ~~~~

    A primer on QC analyses of doctored ROV videos. What? BP doctored ROV videos?

    It is almost unbelievable that a respectable global giant like BP could be so unethical. If you can't make it, fake it. That was what BP did. So far we have been proven right. There is a lot more. Each time we dig, we found more dirt. Many had also wondered how we could tell the difference especially in the light of so many doctored videos released by BP. And why isn't the mainstream media keeping so quiet on BP's data frauds.

     

    With some fundamentals, you can also be your own detective. Here is the how.

    Time & space, cannot be created or subtracted but flow continuously in unison. For example, if an ROV moves from point A to B and then to C, its movement can be described by time, motion, speed and position. You cannot substitute C by A without screwing up the consistency of the all the time-spatial relationships. BP substituted well A coordinates on videos which had been recorded previously at the 3rd well location showing the BOP and Bent Riser. You might wonder why? Such elaborate deceptions played in frontal view of world's audience cannot be just for an April Fool's joke. See later articles coming up on the series.

     

    Essentially it means that you can lie to some people some of the time but you cannot lie to all the people all of the time.

    As you add more factors or constrains, the narrow path of lying becomes even narrower. It is like broadening the stage prop. Remember in the Art of Mass Deception, the stage prop is meant only for the front view audience. Look beyond the stage prop and you will see the flaws. The depth variation constrain was added to our analyses which apparently the fraudsters (not being surveyors) were largely ignorant of.

     

    All of the video footage handed to us have their time-spatial details embedded in them. Adulterating them (by us) would leave graphic evidence no matter how professionally done, especially with videos. Our job here was to prove inconsistencies and adulteration of time-spatial details. We do not adulterate videos submitted to us for analyses in order to fit our analyses. There are many ways to check this but this is not included in our primer here for obvious reasons.

     

    BP's raw video feeds were recorded independently without embedding the time-spatial details. Hence it would have been very easy for BP's technicians to broadcast even live video feeds with superficially generated time-spatial details. This is what we suspected they did generally but not all the time. Each video in question has to be examined on case to case basis.

     

    Depending on operators, the date format can sometimes switch from American (mm dd yy) to British (dd mm yy) and feet to metric. The coordinates are all in feet, but depth and altitude can be in feet or metres. The depth here refers to the ROV Depth or the height of the water column above the ROV (measured by a depth pressure sensor which had to be correctly calibrated). If there is a bulk error (say 30ft) it should rightly appear in all depths displayed. Thus, by subtracting the bulk (or datum error) we can retrieve back the right depth. Altitude, depth, coordinates, heading, are all designed for automatic input from the sensors without human intervention once the system is calibrated, up and running. Any human intervention thereafter is likely to be for fraudulent purposes other than normal operation.

     

    The water depth at the ROV location is the sum of the altitude (measured by an ultrasonic transducer to the seabed) and the ROV depth. This is where the bathymetric chart (in BP's exploration plan) comes in handy. Both well A and B have the same water depth at 4992 ft (+/- 5 ft). The third well being up slope, has a water depth of about 4960 ft. An error range of 5 -10 ft is acceptable but the sensitivity (or variation) when the ROV is stationary should not be more than 1 ft. Heading (Hdg) is the direction of the ROV, measured by the gyro, in degrees from 0 to 360. Be aware that the ROV cameras have both zoom and tilt capability. Some of the ROVs (we are told) have hind cameras mounted on them as well. Still that does not explain the motion and orientation discrepancies in the video; resulting in obvious disconnect between the motion in the video and relative position of the recording ROV.

     

    What we have been unable to demonstrate on still snaphots are the inconsistencies in the motion, speed, direction or orientation so obvious in the playback of these doctored videos? For example on a stationary viewport showing the spewing well, the recording ROV could not have move by hundreds of feet without affecting the area of view. With a stationary ROV (coordinates variation < 1 feet) the object in view (within the viewport) should move in opposite direction to the camera's rotation. For example, if the ROV is rotating to the starboard (increasing heading degrees, to the right facing the bow) the object in view should move towards the left and out of the viewport. But in BP's doctored videos, you will see the disconnect caused by superficially adding the navigation information after the field recording.

     

    One BP schill commented that BP might have accidentally merged the wrong navigation information from other dives. Perhaps. But why do these “wrong navigation information” consistently get merged for only certain sensitive locations and events? Consistency in the “accidental errors” could only mean intent to cheat under the guise of “naturally occurring” accidents or errors.

     

    In many doctored videos, you will see the heading change significantly but the BOP remained stationary within the viewport. You can demonstrate this by using a narrow beam pen-torch light shinning on an object. Of course there are the classic time skips (forward and backwards in time), coordinates jumps of more than hundreds of feets etc etc. Hopefully you can have some fun watching these ROV videos with the right perspective.

     

    BP could only fool the world because the world allows BP to.

     

    Having established some fundamentals, we now analyse figure 165-5, an early video example where the actual ground details were recorded, unadulterated. (So far we had not found any on these sets of videos but readers are welcome to feed us back if we had missed out on any). As a comparison to doctored videos, see Figure 165-5a Recycled Data, Frauds & BP's Gulf Disaster.

     

    All the 3 snapshots extracted from different videos show the famous blowout crater with the huge black oil plume, gushing out to the south (see red arrow in the RT video, bottom left). BP misled the world in claiming that this was just a leak on the broken riser. It was not. It was the blown crater of the third well, which they labeled as well BE. Why would they label the well that blew on 20 April 2010 as well BE and not well A? There is a lot more in depth details in figure 165-5. This is just the tip of the iceberg (frauds in the industry). See later articles for more amazing deception by BP.

     

    We can be quite confident on the direction of the oil flow (from the north) as the picture frame is almost parallel to the pipe (casing). The video snapshot on the lower left was captured from RT broadcast dated on 30 May 2010. The top snapshots were extracted from video recorded on 23 April and 5May(blurred?) 2010. All 3 snapshots show the supposedly 2nd leak on the riser in a crater, referred to as Leak(2).

     

    Based on our past analyses and cross-references, we beg to differ. We had argued from different angles, that leak(2) was in fact the blown crater of the third well (BE) which they intentionally blew shortly after 1700 CDT (2220z) on 22 April. Besides trying to misrepresent the third well (BE) as well A, this “missing massive explosive event” was one of the main reason BP's official story was so ludicrously inconsistent.

     

    The main story (BP's Deception in the Gulf, exposed) will explain further but for now we want to demonstrate the consistencies in the un-doctored videos on an obviously same oil-spewing crater.

     

    The graph on the right bottom is a to-scale plot of the location of the 3 wells. The red text gives the details of the ROV position as per the coordinates in the snapshot. On this video, the ROV was 43ft west of the well BE crater. Thus the heading of 97 deg is about right. The water depth (4957.7 + 4.7) of 4962 ft is much closer to the depth of well BE than well A or well B.

     

    Both the top photos show the yellow pipe (casing) to be dipping northward into the “cemented sediment” with the oil plume gushing out south. Thus all the 3 photos are consistent with each other. The fact that no coordinates were displayed for the videos on 23 April 2010, strongly suggest that BP was well aware of the sensitivity of that information. On some of the earlier videos, the coordinates were displayed as blanks or zeros. In later videos, the coordinates were falsified.

     

    What is the chance of a falling 5000ft long super strong riser (with a 3.5 million pound load-carrying capacity) breaking into two at exactly the same location the DWH burning rig was reported to have drifted to? And where is the other half of the broken riser in the crater? It could not have floated away if it was heavy enough to dig itself into more than 5m of cemented seafloor. The probability must be astronomical, considering that BP made the report (that the burning DWH rig had drifted 714 ft NW from well A) at 220402z (23:02 CDT 21 April); less than 2 days after the discovery of the blown crater. How did BP know beforehand the 5000ft riser was going to break at that point? More amazingly, could a burning rig drift in a dead calm sea, as evident from independently taken photos? BP acknowledged the semi-sub was “anchored” in place by the riser attached to the BOP at the wellhead. Is this not inconsistent with the Drift Theory? How come none of the fire fighting vessels noticed the drift at sea? Why did the reported drift came from BP's Command Centre and not from the coastguards in the field?

     

    As there is negligible slack in the non-stretchable riser, the burning rig had to sink by at least 50ft for it to move that distance. The burning DWH was observed to be listing from the morning of 22 April with the riser still intact. The DWH did not start to sink until the riser was (intentionally) severed at or around 10:22 CDT 22 April. Such precise timing!

     

    This was what we wrote on 25 Aug 2010.

    Twisted tale of the missing 3rd well that blew on 20 April 2010.

    DWH never moved 714ft NE as reported by BP to the Coast Guard. BP had to come up with something to explain why the burning DWH was in that location. The sea was calm and DWH had no power to move. This further confirmed DWH was sitting on top of the S20BC location as correctly predicted by the seabed debris forensic analysis. BP had to move the fallen BOP and placed it on Well A in the aftermath of the blowout. This is one of the many reasons BP cannot release the video footage of the BOP immediately after the second explosion blew off the BOP and broke off the bottom fifth of the riser string as detailed in The-mystery-of-the-april-20-blowout-revealed and in The-art-of-mass-deception-part-1.

    While many missing parts to the giant jigsaw puzzle have yet to be put in place, it is evident we are getting very close to the truth. Hence the intensified attacks and cointelpro on us. We had been confident enough since July 2010 to boldly publish what insiders can only whisper in private.

    The significance of figure 165-5.

    It confirms that the crater with the massive oil plume which BP claimed to be the second leak on the riser was indeed the blown 3rd well. The unadulterated videos are “consistently” consistent with our earlier assertions that the 3rd well that blew its top (BOP, well casing etc) and ended up as an open crater, gushing massive oil directly from the Macondo Reservoir 18,360 ft below. It is time the American public, victims and the world know the truth. BP had pulled wools over America's eyes with the fabricated 1 well - 3 leaks on the riser story long enough.

    You have to wonder why BP spent more than 100 million USD to mercilessly pound their fabricated lies into the mainstream media and cyberspace to conceal the truth. The massive oil spill in the Gulf is only one of their Planned-To-Happen series of disasters. It is not for fun. These disasters including 911 were planned and triggered to serve their multiple global agenda of controlling the world. The late Matts Simmons sacrificed his life to bring the American public the truth of the BP's Gulf Disaster. His death and scores of those fallen heroes, must not be in vain. We will continue to suffer as victims (one way or another) of past and yet to materialise Inside-Job disasters.

    God help us all if the truth continues to be suppressed. The next disaster may be much worse than just a massive oil spill.

    A sneak preview of the startling truths in the Gulf disaster in the coming articles.

    The making of BP’s Mega Oil Spill in the Gulf

    There was no mega oil spill before 1700 CDT 22 April. The mega oil spill could have been averted with several run of the mill options. The 20 April incident was the sort of controllable rig-blowout fire situation the industry expects and routinely trained for. It could have been recovered safely without ending in a disastrous mega oil spill. The facts will show that an explosion within the well was purposely detonated on the evening of 22 April 2010 to induce a second blowout that unleashed the high pressure oil gush from the Macondo reservoir. The second bottom-hole blowout, breaking of the marine riser and sinking of the Deepwater Horizon (DWH), were clear subterfuge from within. How could the official investigations into the causes of this environmental disaster, miss out on all these?

    The initial gas blowout (20 April 2010) which killed 11 drilling crew on the burning Deepwater Horizon rig, did not unleash the massive oil spill as BP and the government regulators had wanted us to believe. A detonated explosion within the well on the evening of 22 April, shortly after 2200z (1700 CDT) did.

    BP’s Killing Spree in the GOM

    Irrefutable proofs and connections of the dots would be presented in the later parts of this series dubbed “BP’s Killing Spree in the GOM”. The articles would show that BP knowingly drilled into 3 hazardous (high risk) well locations (not 1 well as BP officially declared before the US Congress) without adequate risk aversion precautions.

     

    It is like having repeated unprotected sex with a confirmed HIV positive partner despite being forewarned. The evidence would also show that BP’s killing spree in the gulf, unmistakably started as early as March 2010. Pro BP apologists argued the abnormal high number of stranded cetaceans (> 60 dolphins and whales) in March 2010 (a month before the blowout in April) was proof that the cetaceans were stranded from unknown natural causes before the mega oil spill. The March average for the years 2002-2009, was less than 19. They failed to mention that Methane, Hydrogen Sulfide (commonly encountered in exploration drilling), drilling mud and cement had been spilling in enormous quantities (abnormal circulation losses suffered by BP) into the gulf since February 2010.

     

    The toxicity peaked in March 2010 coinciding with the heaviest drilling losses from the 3 wells at the more problematical shallow zone; from late Feb to early April. BP abandoned well A in mid Feb with hefty drilling losses during an out of well control situation, drilled well B and well BE (3rd well) with even heavier drilling losses from 16 Mar to 7April. There is no necessity to invoke unexplained natural causes as the stranded rate correlates very well with the level of toxicity in the gulf.

    The spike for the month of March 2011 was again due to increased toxicity caused by the 9.0 Japan earthquake which shook up more oil discharges into the gulf water from the shallow oil accumulations. The statistics on the stranded dolphins accurately reflect the toxicity in the gulf water as revealed in this article,Mystery Of The New Found Oil Revealed.

     

  • NEW ORLEANS -- A federal judge has ruled that Halliburton, the Houston-based company that supplied cement for the ill-fated Macondo well that blew in the Gulf of Mexico, may not have to pay many of the pollution claims that resulted from the catastrophic spill because it was shielded in a contract with well-owner BP.

    Still, U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier said Tuesday that Halliburton is not exempt from paying punitive damages and civil penalties that arise from the April 20, 2010, blowout off the Louisiana coast. Those penalties could amount to billions of dollars.

    The judge also said Halliburton's indemnity could be voided if the company is found to have defrauded BP. He did not rule on BP's allegations that Halliburton committed fraud by declaring the cement safe to use.

  • Story Photo

    (Updated 02 Feb 2010)

    First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.....Mahatma Gandhi

    During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.......George Orwell.

    We have presented many examples of doctored ROV video with adulterated details since the start of our independent investigation on the BP's Macondo blowout and the mega oil spill in the Gulf. Although any form of adulteration is unethical, we have unearthed many forms of doctored documents, videos, survey logs and even seismic data in our QC/QA (quality control / quality assurance) work in the oil industry. Unbelievable but in reality such fraudulent practices are the norm rather than the deception. Smooth Operators work around regulations as the following extract shows.

     

    Below is a fictionalized account of the safety frauds that are occurring on a daily basis in the offshore industry.

    Nobody believes it when you are telling the truth, fictions are more believable.

    Imagine a geohazards survey vessel commissioned by an oil company (NeverDelay Oil) for an urgent survey. Geohazards surveys are always urgent and the safety clearance (insurance purposes) for drilling an oil well is always required like yesterday. But the vessel master who was contracted by the shipping agent to command the vessel just a week ago, refused to sail a vessel of such dilapidated condition.

    The vessel (let us call it M/V Broken Junk 1 aka BJ1) had been mothballed at port for many years. Although the sea worthiness and safety certificates had just been issued, the Indonesian sea captain knew better than to risk the lives of his 40 crewmen comprising nationalities from several countries including Australia, Singapore and UK, He asked for urgent critical repairs to be made first in Singapore as required by law. But the world's largest contractor (fully accredited ISO 9000 plus) also known by the name FuGold Intl (Forever UnderGoing Repairs Offshore) insisted that the vessel sail by the next 3 days. Faced with extreme pressure, the captain resigned on the spot. No problemo.

    The smooth operator always have a list of subservient free-lunch employees who they can depend on at times like this. Captain SNA (ServeAlways Noquestions Asked) answered the urgent call for duty but his medical fitness was a problem. He has been suffering from abdominal pains for months. He was afraid of going for a proper medical checkup in case his persistent medical condition grounded him permanently from offshore duties. He needed the job. This last minute call up was what he had been waiting for. He informed Fugold his medical certificate had expired (offshore workers over 50 years old require annual checkup). Again no problemo. “just fly in to port, we will arrange..” said the operation manager widely known as Mr SafetyFraud. He called up SMC (SickaPoor Medical Centre) for the instant medical certificate to be issued without physical examination. Fugold could have insisted Capt SNA take his medical examination at Manila but he would be needed to attend the Offshore Safety Survivor Safety course as required by HSE (health, safety environment) regulations. It would have taken another 3 more days. At 50,000 USD/day charge to NeverDelay Oil (NDO), it would mean a loss of 150,000 USD chargeable income, besides incurring additional berth charges at port and full onboard survey crew costs. Why bother when counterfeit safety certificates can be faxed to the vessel for cursory inspection? After all, almost all of the vessel's certificates had been fraudulently obtained in the country of registration where corruption is rampant. It would only be a cursory inspection once the credentials of the EU registered international global company is impressed upon the would-be inspectors.

     

    Fugold is accredited against the international quality standard ISO 9001:2000 and operates in accordance with a Health, Safety standard OHSAS 18001:999 and Environmental Management System standard ISO14001:2004 which is integrated with its Quality Management System. Together these systems conform to all national and international legislation as well as industry guidelines. Fugold is a member of the multi-national group of companies with 200 offices operating in over 45 countries. Clients can benefit from individual and collective experience of hundreds of survey professionals worldwide.

     

    With credentials like that, who would dare to question the authenticity of the medical certificate issued from a respectable first world country ranked as the least corrupted country in the world.

     

    The vessel sailed 3 days later after the QC Client Rep from RePeeAss (Restassured Problems Aside Intl) skimmed through all the safety papers and certificates, rushed immediately to his cabin to pass out from 3 days of booze-binge before coming offshore. Less than 3 hours out into the open sea, fire broke out at the engine room followed by a total blackout.

     

    The contractor's party chief (KendoNever SayDie) assured the crew everything was in order. He issued a warning “I am afraid we might not be able complete the survey before this old junk totally breaks down. So please rush everything just in case another fire puts us out of operation. I want everyone to keep a constant lookout for fire breakout 24/7. Our lives depend on it. We have disengaged the fire alarm. Otherwise nobody gets any sleep at all. I know it will be hot in your cabins. The chief engineer informed that the central air-con system cannot be used without risking another fire from the messy burnt internal wiring. Treat this as your privileged Sauna Bath cruise. The operation and recording rooms are fitted with new external air-con. This will be added incentives to work longer hours. Good luck and God Bless us all.”

     

    PC KNSD then ordered the engineers to by-pass the safety fuse-box with direct wiring, disengaged the pesky fire alarm and went on to report to FGHQ SF.

     

    PC KNSD: “Houston ...we have a problem....blah....blah”

    FGHQ SF: “IRY. But proceed with O survey plan, repeat urgent. Put incident as Successful Fire Drill. How's CR?”

    PC KNSD: “Still passed out”

    FGHQ SF: “Good thing we had 3 days at Manila. Put the bar tab as Mob Expenses & Port clearance. Use the Misc ER”.

    PC KNSD: “Ok, but..err..fraid' the x-wire might not hold for 3 weeks. BJ1 leaking, MER heating up, stalled a couple of times and Bilge pump NF. Other minor problems but culd burst into bigger things. Man this bucket shudn't even be out here”

     

    FGHQ SF: “Typhoon startin' in the Pacific. Shud hit landfall some time next week. Call weather, head to nearest port next week. Cebu alright? Parts heading there”

    PC KNSD: “We are too far south to be affected but Ok, Think of somethin' ”

     

    3 days later 5 am:

     

    PC KNSD: “Houston ...we have a new problem”

    FGHQ SF: “Huh? What's up? Port call another 2 days to go”

    PC KNSD: “Capt passed out. He's in extreme pain”

    FGHQ SF: “OMG. What happened?”

    PC KNSD: “His appendix burst, I think. Can't move. Can't touch stomach area. Need Medivac”

     

    FGHQ SF: “Jeezus. Finished the priority site yet?”

    PC KNSD: “No, another 5 hours to go. Err another problem.. seismic compressor gone total kaput last night. Halon gas-fire smothering system discharged by another fire in MER. Control panel burnt. No rudder control, Total radio comms blackout”

     

    FGHQ SF: “Jeezus. This is worse than I thought. Knew we shudn't hv taken that MF old junk. But GM said NO. Price as low. @!$%#. Git her for 500USD and charge NeverDelay Oil 50,000 USD/day. How much lower can u get? Log these down, will ya. Will git Mohan to give another month free for all these @!$%#in problems. Hold a minute. Get back to you”.

     

    After 10 minutes.

    FGHQ SF: “Ok. Pull up gears and head for Manila”

    PC KNSD: “What! Site not completed yet. El Nido is nearest, get there in 3 hours.”

     

    FGHQ SF: “No. Change of Plans. Reloop previous data for present site. Look Dbase in 2007 for Dummo Petroleum. They are just 50 km apart. Similar seafloor & water depth. Will pm RepeeAss on better than expected survey progress. Cite the exceptionally calm sea before the storm. Can't repair them @!$%#in French-made power supply-voltage regulator. Need to be in Manila for major rep job. Do the necessary data swap and details. Can you limp back to port?”

     

    PC KNSD: “Think so. At half speed ok but ...but Capt's in pain. Dunno if he can make it that long. Shud we drop him in El Nido first?”

     

    FGHQ SF: “No, No! Don't @!$%#in do that. Will blow our cover. No port call before Manila. It wuld be in the records. Can't have that. Open Sea okay. @!$%#! He is such a pain in the ass. Just pump in some more morphin or somethin. If he doesn't make it, report an accident or somethin that don't put us in a spot. Serve him right for getting onboard with a pre med problem. Shuld hv known better than to get him that fake MC. He will git us all into lots' trouble. Make sure it is an accident, ok? Don't ask again. Anybody knows. What about the CR?”

     

    PC KNSD: “only the mess boy and Chief mate. Can handle 'em. A big bonus'll do. At M'nila, a night out ok? Don't worry bout' CR. Gave him somethin' for his hang-over. Will keep him in bed next 2 days until M'nila. Over and out. ”

     

    (NB: Capt SNA had advanced gallstones in the bladder medical conditions. Immediate surgical procedures saved his life just in time upon landing. His doctors commented he would have died if he was brought in a bit later. )

     

    At Manila Port, 2 days later.

    NeverDelay Oil company (project manager) to FGHQ SF, PC KNSD & survey crew at sign off:

    “I want to thank everyone for an excellent job. Evrything went smoothly and exceptionally well. Best of all we beat the deadline. The CR told me you guys went overboard to save us from being hit by weather. Thanks. Let me buy you all a dinner tonight at the Hilton.”

     

    ~ above is a compressed rendition of 95% truth and 5% fiction (times, names of parties involved). With this happening everywhere in the world, it is no big surprise the videos from BP were doctored to cover the truth to conveniently play out the deception game. If things play out better than expected or the field operations run too smoothly, junk it. It never happens. Murphy's Laws always apply.

    See figure 165-5a as one of the many proofs of recycled data and doctored video. It will be apparent in the coming articles that the blown crater with the oil plume (referred to as Leak(2) on the riser) is actually the blown crater of the third well (BE). As the crater on the seafloor cannot be moving, it is obvious that BP falsified the navigation details on the video. Adulteration, faking and all sorts of frauds are being committed every day in almost every segment of the industry. Because what you don't know, don't hurt until a disaster blows up in our face. Then it is called an “Accident”. In BP's Macondo blowout and mega oil spill disaster, it was more than just an accident.

     

  • Story Photo

    Douglas H. Brown, the chief mechanic for the Deepwater Horizon, testified Wednesday that he witnessed a “skirmish” on the rig between a BP well site leader and crew members employed by Transocean, the rig’s owner, the morning of the blast.

    ¶ Mr. Brown said the disagreement followed BP’s decision to replace heavy drilling fluid with lighter saltwater before the well was sealed with a final cement plug.

    ¶ “Well, this is how it’s going to be,” the BP official said, according to Mr. Brown.

    ¶ Mr. Gowers declined to answer questions about workers’ accusations or about whether cost may have factored into the company’s decision to use the casing system it chose for the Deepwater Horizon.

  • Story Photo

    Mark Hafle, the BP drilling engineer who wrote plans for well casings and cement seals on the Deepwater Horizon's well, testified that the well had lost thousands of barrels of mud at the bottom. But he said models run onshore showed alterations to the cement program would resolve the issues, and when asked if a cement failure allowed the well to "flow" gas and oil, he wouldn't capitulate.

    Hafle said he made several changes to casing designs in the last few days before the well blew, including the addition of the two casing liners that weren't part of the original well design because of problems where the earthen sides of the well were "ballooning." He also worked with Halliburton engineers to design a plan for sealing the well casings with cement.

  • Story Photo

    Uploaded by crackerwv on Aug 19, 2011

    Here's the patent links...
    Patent 3899144 (Powder Contrail Generation): www.freepatentsonline.com/3899144.html
    Patent 5003186 (Welsbach Seeding): www.freepatentsonline.com/5003186.html
    Patent 7582809 (Aluminum Resistant Seeds): www.patents.com/us-7582809.html
    ( Just a note...for those who want the song, it is Constellation by the Firmament Band)

    If you disagree or choose to dislike this video, please don't be a COWARD and run off without giving us a reason or a chance to educate you properly. I REALLY want to know the reasoning and thoughts of a person that would defend such evil actions.

    The other things in the video you can just search for on a search engine. The reason I did not provide those links is simply because I WANT people to just OBSERVE how much information is out there concerning everything I put in this video. Just type in company names, people's names, court cases involving MONSANTO. NAZI involvement of these companies in WARS and depopulation. Another reason you SHOULD DO THIS is because YOU might stumble across some information I did not see. I want people to come back and share that with others OR take it and make your own videos and such about it. We are ALL in this together and we ALL must work in conjunction, just as these companies do against US, to EXPOSE these people.

    People do not realize just how bizarre of a world we are living in right now and to the extent at which those in power will go to retain it. This video is a representation of just a FEW things I researched and wanted to share.

    There's much more to this. The ties to Bush, Rumsfeld, GD Searle, IG Farben, Hitler...it just goes on and on. If anyone would like be to even further expand on this information, leave it in a comment. Monsanto will never admit but THEY WERE directly connected with the company in Hungary that spilled the red fluoride sludge that killed 100 people and infested the Danube.

  • Story Photo

    Uploaded by Travinyle1 on Jun 2, 2010

    http://www.FreedomizerRadio.com
    http://www.Twitter.com/Travinyle1

    This video has not been able to play since it hit around 1,000 views

    BP Pressured Rig Worker to Hurry Before Disaster, Father Says
    http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-05-27/bp-pressured-rig-worker-to-hurry-...
    Category:

  • Story Photo

     

    The truth of the disaster is:

    1. BP drilled 3 wells (well A, well B and then the third which was labelled BE).

    2. The blowout that occurred at 2200 CDT 20 April 2010 did not breach the base cement plug as we had analysed as far back as July 2010. It was caused by a shallow gas influx from the gas-saturated weak Sub Formation (GWSF) zone.  See http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/30/4781973-why-is-bps-macondo-blowout-so-disastrous-beyond-patch-up

    3. The more disastrous second bottom-hole blowout occurred on the evening of 22 April  (after 1700 CDT). It was induced by a powerful explosion detonated from within the well. This started the mega oil spill in the gulf. The BOP, riser and top hole casings were blown off the well and lay scattered on the seafloor.  In its place, the famous crater with the oil spewing out. BP called it the 2nd leak on the riser. Tony Hayward tried to twist it further by saying "It was only a small leak in a big ocean".

    4. They had to fake the standing BOP from earlier recorded footage. The only trouble is ....there was no gas/oil spewing from the cracks in the Bent Riser. Because the videos on 23 April onwards were all recorded before the 2nd bottom hole blowout. 

    5. 20 days later, they reassembled the riser onto a new BOP at well A. What you saw then was the "fake blowout gushing well" while the real gusher well was bellowing 720 ft NW of well A.

    Hard to believe. Stay tuned as we present even more evidence. If this is not the truth, we would have been tripping over a thousand times since July 2010. The fact that we did not, shows we had been on the right path towards unearthing the whole truth about this disaster. The truth is so much stranger than fiction. Wait till you read the coming series, currently in their final drafts.

    BP's deception in the Gulf, exposed.

    BP's killing spree in the Gulf ~ dealing with long term environmental consequences of the Gulf disaster

    The mafia in the global oil industry ~ the crime of mass destruction and unscrupulous market manipulation behind these mega oil spill disasters.

  • Story Photo

    Washington, DC — Top Obama officials manipulated scientific analyses of independent experts to seriously lowball the amount of oil leaking from the BP Deepwater Horizon, according to a scientific integrity complaint filed today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).

    Documents obtained by PEER through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit indicate White House pressure to present low-range estimates as best estimates. In fact, numbers presented to the public were less than half the true flow rate.

    On May 19, 2010, one month after the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe, the White House announced creation of a group of experts from academia, industry and government to generate an accurate and independent estimate of the oil leak rate. This group was called the Flow Rate Technical Group (FRTG).

    Using new scientific integrity rules, PEER today filed a complaint charging that the leader of one of the FRTG Teams, Dr. William Lehr of the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), manipulated the scientific results of the FRTG experts throughout the entire crisis to significantly understate the spill rate. Lehr is also the author of the now infamous “Oil Budget Calculator” and a report concluding 75% of the oil was gone from the Gulf by August 2010.

  • Story Photo

    The pictures speak for themselves on the gross distortion of truth. Are we going to let BP get away wit this? Did 11 crew die in a preplanned mega oil spill?  Three things you cannot hide, the SUN, the Moon and the Truth ~ Buddha.

  • Story Photo

     

    According to all mainstream media and investigation reports, the gas blowout on 2200 CDT 20 April 2010, started the oil gushing out of the Macondo Reservoir continuously for the next 87 days. Total estimated oil leaked: 5 million barrels. Yet on all the video footage on 22 April 2010, there was no leaks at all.

    Early morning of Friday, 23 April 2010, CBS News broadcast the following statement from the Federal On-Scene Coordinator Rear Admiral Mary Landry (the ranking federal official on the spill response at that time):

    “At this time there is no crude emanating from that wellhead at the ocean floor . . . . there is no oil emanating from the riser either. That statement was made after BP enlisted remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) to investigate the immediate wellhead area. Footage shown from those ROVs did not show any leaks”.

    BP’s own videos at http://OilSpillhub.org show no leakage at this time.

    Yet 20 days later, the world was mesmerized 24/7 with the live broadcast of the Gushing Well? How did BP manage to turn on and off the well? Why were the videos from 23 April 2010 till mid May showing the BOP with the Bent Riser all doctored with falsified ROV details, inconsistent coordinates and headings? This has to be the greatest magic (deception) show on earth; "BP's deception in the GUlf". 

  • Story Photo

    Tony Hayward, the former chief executive of BP, has been accused of giving untruthful evidence to US Congress, by plaintiffs suing for damages over the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

    In court filings, lawyers argue that Mr Hayward "at best, has a unique view of the truth", citing his congressional testimony from June 2010, in which they claim he was untruthful over the scope of BP's internal investigation into the disaster.

    The allegations were made in response to BP's attempts to preclude parts of Mr Hayward's deposition - when he was questioned by the plaintiff's lawyers in preparation for the court case - from being used in evidence at the trial on the grounds he was asked "improper questions".

  • Story Photo

    Uploaded by redhawkmessenger on May 15, 2011

    George Carlin was one of the very few public figures with the balls to tell it like it is and he didn't give a damn about political correctness or what anyone thought about it. The reason for that is because he always told the truth and stood behind the truth. He was not delusional and he refused to be a sheep and follow the status quo. Everyone thought he was a comedian, but the fact is that all he was doing was telling everyone how utterly ridiculous you look trying to be something you're not and listening to people convincing you that blatant lies are truth. Very funny indeed!
    RIP, George, we all love you!
    Credit: juanaraujo00

  • Story Photo

    Uploaded by JMacQ77 on Aug 24, 2010

    This a shortened version of the video captured on 7 July 2010 at 1:54PM by Youtube user "X2YeZCAMCNC," so thanks to him or her. This shows once again, this time with excellent video quality, the well at site B which BP says does not exist. Taken from the Skandi Neptune ROV 2 video feed.

  • Story Photo

    Uploaded by Snordelhans on Jan 23, 2012

    The Heretic presents, Mike Rivero's "USS Enterprise False Flag" from http://whatreallyhappened.com/

    Uncle Sam and Auntie Semite, a wicked piece of work.

    The Zionist state of israel is like a foaming at the mouth rabid dog hell bent on destroying humanity and MUST be stoped...cut the wings of this dark angel before it is too late.

  • Story Photo

    You will never hear this on the main news.

  • Story Photo

    An Ill-fated Discovery
    According to news accounts, at about 10 p.m. CDT last Tuesday, Deepwater Horizon was stable, holding an exact position in calm, dark seas about 45 miles south of the Louisiana coastline. Water depth in the area is 5,000 feet. The vessel manifest listed 126 souls on board.

    Deepwater Horizon was finishing work on an exploration well named Macondo, in an area called Mississippi Canyon Block 252. After weeks of drilling, the rig had pushed a bit down over 18,000 feet, into an oil-bearing zone. The Transocean and BP personnel were installing casing in the well. BP was going to seal things up, and then go off and figure out how to produce the oil -- another step entirely in the oil biz.

    The Macondo Block 252 reservoir may hold as much as 100 million barrels. That's not as large as other recent oil strikes in the Gulf, but BP management was still pleased. Success is success --
    certainly in the risky, deep-water oil environment. The front office of BP Exploration was preparing a press release to announce a "commercial" oil discovery.

  • Story Photo

    PLEASE sign the online petition:
    http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/demand-independent-survey-of-bp-s-relief-...

    The government documentation provided in this video Prove beyond any reasonable doubt that BP is lying about the status of the Relief Well D in the Gulf of Mexico that was drilled as a means to 'kill' the original Macondo well that blew. The Relief Well D was reportedly sealed by BP in September 2010. Why and how was a BOP Test ran on a 'permanently sealed' and capped well? That my friends is physically IMPOSSIBLE! So, now that you know, are you going to allow our government to continue covering up for BP and allowing them to manage their Own Crime Scene? Or are you going to be a voice of courage and reason?

    Links to publicly available documents at BOERME:

    WAR Reports
    (3-6-11) http://www.gomr.boemre.gov/homepg/fastfacts/war/war.asp?-169939
    (2-8-11) http://www.gomr.boemre.gov/homepg/fastfacts/war/war.asp?-169392
    (8-22-10) http://www.gomr.boemre.gov/homepg/fastfacts/war/war.asp?-161557

    APM's
    (8-19-10) http://www.gomr.boemre.gov/homepg/fastfacts/apm/apm.asp?-128502
    (2-8-11) http://www.gomr.boemre.gov/homepg/fastfacts/apm/apm.asp?-130805
    (3-2-11) http://www.gomr.boemre.gov/homepg/fastfacts/apm/apm.asp?-132244

    End of Ops
    (3-8-11) http://www.gomr.boemre.gov/homepg/fastfacts/EndofOperations/eor.asp?-111448
    (8-21-10) http://www.gomr.boemre.gov/homepg/fastfacts/EndofOperations/eor.asp?-111448

    Again, a sincere Thank You to Shirley Tillman, Lorie Williams, Laurel Lockamy, and Trisha James. Also Thank You Dahr Jamail reporter and Erika Blumenfeld photographer for AlJazeera and all the Gulf Warriors who are continuing to report the ongoing depth of the true devastation in the Gulf of Mexico due to BP's disasterous explosion of the Deep Water Horizon.

    This research and accompanying petition are solely the expressed opinion of Rhea Aker.

  • Story Photo

    What really brought down the deep water horizon?

    Continuing oil leaks from the reservoir & spraying of corexit are creating health problems in the Gulf.  You need to listen to this series of video, to understand the crimes BP had committed.

  • Uploaded by lockamy1 on Jan 20, 2012

    I took this video of HUNDREDS OF DEAD FISH every step on he beach KILLED BY THE BP OIL SPILL on 6-9-11 in Gulfport, Mississippi

  • Story Photo

    Today is Thursday September 29, 2011. A friend of mine just returned from Venice, Louisiana on a fact finding mission. He spent 2 days there and talked to dozens of fishermen and BP contractors and Coast Guard personnel and there is alot of oil at the Deepwater Horizon-Macondo well site. It is not a sheen, It is several inches thick in some spots. A chemical analysis has confirmed it is Macondo oil.There is alot of activity in Venice and resources are being ramped up.
    Word is that geological formation above oil deposit is unstable and oil is leaking from fissures around wellhead. All sealife on ocean bottom is dead according to Woods Hole Oceanograpic Institute in 30+ mile radius from site and Corexit dispersant is present in large amounts. According to Sergio Alex Villalobos who is a toxicologist for Nalco, the company that makes Corexit,”Once It’s mixed with oil,that’s where you get the most impact, that’s were you see most of the toxicity”.
    He was quoted in the September 2010 issue of Scientific American magazine on page 26. There are alot of sick people that worked on the initial oil spill cleanup and residents in many coastal towns and cities that are sick. This is the second inning of a long nightmare and anyone who signed a release to get a ‘quickpay’ from BP and their minion Fienberg should hire a lawyer asap and hope they can get their release annulled. BP top brass are sociopaths… “

  • Story Photo

    A cave-in along Bukit Timah Road towards Woodlands Road caused a heavy jam on Wednesday afternoon, local media reported.

    Click here to find out more!
    The cave-in along a drain embankment at the junction of Bukit Timah Road and Clementi Road reportedly occurred on Tuesday night.

    Out of the four lanes, two lanes on Bukit Timah Road were closed to traffic. Maintenance crews have been carrying out roadworks since 10pm, Tuesday, to fill the holes, daily freesheet Today reported.

  • Story Photo

    Curators at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum, where the rock has attracted tens of thousands of visitors each year, discovered that the "lunar rock", valued at £308,000, was in fact petrified wood.

    Xandra van Gelder, who oversaw the investigation, said the museum would continue to keep the stone as a curiosity.

    "It's a good story, with some questions that are still unanswered," she said. "We can laugh about it."

    The rock was given to Willem Drees, a former Dutch leader, during a global tour by Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins and Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin following their moon mission 50 years ago.

  • Story Photo

    Accountability by corporate and government leaders would be the quickest way to get rid of corruption. Imagine if Dick Cheney was in prison right now instead of a press junket, the corrupt corporate/government landscape would change overnight.

    Deregulation and Plunder in Texas

    The Texas heatwave in early August resulted in a 6000% increase in emergency energy costs due to a shortage caused by the Energy Reliability Council of Texas' (ERCOT) gross underestimate of summer electricity demand. ERCOT is a quasi-governmental "non-profit" company that manages the grid and the marketplace for 85% of the state's customers. Texas has been bilked out of at least $11 billion since the advent of deregulation.

    ERCOT was created when Texas deregulated the electricity market in 2002 under a law passed by former Governor Bush. ERCOT has a history of corruption (note: the report's criticisms of ERCOT appear accurate, but its author Oncor is compromised, too- they are Smart Meter pushers and are owned by Goldman Sachs, et al).

    Enron, a private Houston based corporation and energy marketer, was the primary architect of deregulation in Texas. Enron's Ken Lay was undersecretary of the Department of Interior, so he knew who to bribe to manipulate policies. Enron excelled in lobbying for deregulation and spent over $8 million since 1998 in its home state with contributions (bribes) to both Bush and Rick Perry.

    Texas unfairly bases its energy prices on natural ga instead of cheap coal prices using standard commodity pricing. However, some critics believe that natural gas gets an unfair advantage because of insider corruption.

  • Story Photo

    * Pennsylvania natgas well blows out during fracking

    * Local residents have been evacuated

    NEW YORK, April 20 (Reuters) - A natural gas well was spilling thousands of gallons of fracking fluid water in Pennsyvlania on Wednesday after a blowout during the process of fracturing the bedrock, state and local regulators said.

    The well, operated by Chesapeake Energy (CHK.N: Quote), suffered a blowout during the process of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, the state environmental regulators said. .

    The well began spewing water at 11.45 p.m. on Tuesday and local residents have been evacuated from Leroy Township, Bradford County, the company said in a statement. No one was hurt, it said.

    "An equipment failure occurred during well-completion activities, allowing the release of completion fluids," the statement said.

  • Movie showing BP is far from done cleaning up their mess - by Michele Walker-Harmon.

    For those die-hard BP supporters (paid or otherwise, vested business interests or otherwise or simply for just being dependent on BP life support system), please wake up to reality.  These are compelling evidence that all is not well. Destroying the planet is destroying us all. No one is spared. 

  • Story Photo

    Jan. 5th 2012 10pm

    Nomac Drilling Rig #17 drilled into a shallow gas pocket soon after spudding in at a drilling depth of 900' northwest of Sweetwater, Oklahoma this evening around 6pm and burned to the ground. No injuries were reported.

    Workers stated that they encountered the abnormally pressurized zone at relief time around 6pm when the relief crew was in the change house.

    It was first thought that they had encountered a shallow air pocket but after testing with a "sniffer" (a device to determine the presence of hydrocarbons) the well soon caught fire.
    Witnesses 3/4 of a mile to the north reported hearing a loud "boom" from their residence "and then it sounded like a jet engine was right outside our home".

  • BP has been ordered to take immediate steps to address a number of "serious breaches" of regulations in connection with a fire on its Valhall platform last year, Norway's offshore safety authority said Thursday.

    The Petroleum Safety Authority said the July 13 fire involved the breakdown of a crane engine due to overheating, which led to a fire in the vent stack of the platform's compressors. The blaze led to production at the 40,000 barrel a day field shutting down for more than two months.

    "Overheating combined with a defective spark arrestor and silencer meant that red-hot particles leaving the exhaust pipe blew across and ignited flammable gases from the vent stack," the regulator said in a statement.

  • Story Photo

    As our van rolled to a stop in front of the Rantau Panjang security checkpoint near the Malaysian-Thai border, an officer from the General Operations Force (GOF) walked out of the guard post and motioned us to lower the window.

    "Sepuluh ringgit, cepat, cepat (RM10/S$2, hurry, hurry)," he whispered, extending his hand inside the vehicle and glancing nervously at the other vehicles that had pulled up behind our dilapidated van.

    An undercover enforcement officer in the front passenger seat pulled out RM10 and handed it to the middle-aged GOF officer. He then let us through with a wave of his hand.

    Moments later, at another checkpoint - this time, Customs - the undercover agent got out and opened the back door of the van and showed them our illicit cargo of contraband fragrant rice stuffed in pillowcases and other taxable goods.

    The payoff this time was RM50 (S$20.50) and the methodology involved a bit of sleight-of-hand.

  • Story Photo

    Though the director isn’t as combative as Michael Moore, he asks tough questions and elicits squirms from several participants, notably former Treasury secretary David McCormick and Columbia dean Glenn Hubbard, George W. Bush’s economic adviser.

    Their reactions are understandable, since the borders between Wall Street, Washington, and the Ivy League dissolved years ago; it’s hard to know who to trust when conflicts of interest run rampant.

    If Ferguson takes Reagan and Bush to task for tax cuts that benefit the wealthy, he criticizes Clinton for encouraging derivatives and Obama for failing to deliver on the promise of reform. And in the category of unlikely heroes: former governor Eliot Spitzer, who fought against fraud as New York’s attorney general (he’s the subject of Gibney’s documentary Client 9).

  • Only 17 months before BP's Deepwater Horizon rig suffered a deadly blowout in the Gulf of Mexico, another BP deepwater oil platform also blew out.

    You've heard and seen much about the Gulf disaster that killed 11 BP workers. If you have not heard about the earlier blowout, it's because BP has kept the full story under wraps. Nor did BP inform Congress or US safety regulators, and BP, along with its oil industry partners, have preferred to keep it that way.

    The earlier blowout occurred in September 2008 on BP's Central Azeri platform in the Caspian Sea.

    As one memo marked "secret" puts it, "Given the explosive potential, BP was quite fortunate to have been able to evacuate everyone safely and to prevent any gas ignition." The Caspian oil platform was a spark away from exploding, but luck was with the 211 rig workers.

    It was eerily similar to the Gulf catastrophe as it involved BP's controversial "quick set" drilling cement.

  • A Noble Lie details years of investigative research on the false flag that was the Oklahoma City Bombing.

    Leonard59 says:
    December 18, 2011 at 4:34 pm

    I just watched the video and it is pretty good, in my opinion. I had seen bits and pieces of local news coverage and interviews with eye-witness and survivors on ‘YouTube’ and knew there was something wrong about the ‘official government story’, but this video does a pretty good job of putting it all together about the OKC bombing.

    I watched the day of the bombing unfold on television with special interest because I had lived and worked in the Oklahoma City area many years ago, and I also saw how the story changed from day to day.

    This DVD is powerful and disturbing, and downright scary to see and consider a real case of domestic terrorism committed by our own government or rogue elements within this government

  • High waves hit many seaside southern provinces yesterday, spreading panic among locals who were reminded of the 2004 deadly tsunami.

    RELATED STORIES

    $4 billion Thai flood rehabilitation package announced
    Thai flooding crisis scares off tourists
    Flood woes mount in Thailand's south
    Tsunamis that hit Asia from 2004 to 2011
    In Chumphon, waves ravaged hundreds of houses and strong winds uprooted many trees. Some local fishermen lost contact with others after sea conditions turned hostile.

    Acting on behalf of Lang Suan district chief, senior assistant district officer Apinya Khondee ordered the evacuation of affected people.

    Elsewhere, the big waves and strong winds also caused panic.

    "I've never seen such big waves before," said Fon Yangnoi, a 60-year-old resident in Prachuap Khiri Khan's Sam Roi Yot district.

    He was speaking after the waves, between two and four metres high, ravaged seaside restaurants and shops along the coastline.

    "The waves were so high and the winds were so strong that they were frightening," Hua Hin Beach Shop Club chairwoman Somprapa Morakan said.

  • Story Photo

    THE five-hour disruption on the North-South MRT Line on Thursday started with four trains stopping in the tunnel, leaving 127,000 commuters stranded - 4,000 of whom were stuck in stuffy carriages.

    A COMPLEX SITUATION
    Ms Saw, flanked by Khoo Hean Siang (left) and Goh Chee Kong (right), ruled out ageing infrastructure as the cause for the misalignment because the company undertakes strict routine maintenance and regular overhauls
    SMRT Corp president and CEO Saw Phaik Hwa apologised for the lapse at a media briefing yesterday.

    'Many commuters are unhappy at the moment. There is nothing more to say except that we are very sorry,' she said. 'We apologise for the considerable inconvenience, especially to those who were uncomfortable in the stranded trains.'

    The disruption started at 6.47pm and was caused by a 40-metre section of misaligned third rail between Dhoby Ghaut and City Hall MRT stations.

    Ms Saw said the cause of the misalignment was still being investigated but ruled out ageing infrastructure because the listed company undertakes strict routine maintenance and regular overhauls.

    'We can't ascertain why it happened because it's never happened before,' she said.

    SMRT said a confluence of factors complicated 'a complex situation'. There was the peak-hour congestion as well as the severity of the problem.

     

  • IN the CBD, one marine insurance professional now gets swaggering rights in cubicle land, with the distinction of having smashed an SMRT train's glass window with a fire extinguisher.

    The man who broke a window to let air into one of the many train carriages stranded without ventilation for almost an hour during the train breakdown on the North-South line on Thursday wishes to stay anonymous. 'I'm still afraid that I might get into trouble with the authorities, even though I had no criminal intent,' he told BT.

    The 31-year-old and his wife had been travelling north after work when the lights began to flicker soon after their train left Dhoby Ghaut station. 'This never happens, so I knew something was wrong,' he said. Between Somerset and Orchard, the train came to a halt. The driver told passengers that the train was experiencing technical problems. 'Unfortunately, several other functions started to shut down. Eventually, it got to the point where the ventilation fans were not working,' he said.

  • THE SMART Tunnel is the pride and joy of the authorities who have always touted it as the ultimate solution to the flood problems in Kuala Lumpur. When the project was rushed to be opened in January 2007, we were all told that the floods that hit the city a few months earlier would be the last as the tunnel was the longest and biggest storm drain project in South-East Asia.

    True enough, for several years our capital city seemed to have been spared from any deluge despite some heavy downpour. Motorists were irritated when the tunnel had to be closed to accommodate the draining of rainwater to the retention ponds but, generally, city folk were impressed with the workings of the RM1.9bil Storm Water Management and Road Tunnel project - until last Tuesday.

  • Story Photo

    A drilling rig with 67 crew on board capsized and sank off Russia's far eastern island of Sakhalin on Sunday while being towed through a winter storm, leaving more than 50 dead or missing in the icy Sea of Okhotsk.

    Emergency officials said the crew of an icebreaker and tugboat rescued 14 workers alive from the jack-up rig, the 'Kolskaya', which was operated by a Russian offshore exploration firm. They recovered four bodies from the water.

    "The Kolskaya keeled to its side ... and sank within 20 minutes. The depth of the water at the site is 1,042 metres (3,400 feet)," Russia's federal water transport agency said on its website.

    Four of the survivors, suffering from hypothermia, were airlifted by helicopter to land and taken to hospital after the disaster struck at 12:45 p.m. (0145 GMT).

    The rest of the crew were missing, 200 km (125 miles) off the coast of remote Sakhalin island. The water temperature was one degree Celsius (33.8 Fahrenheit), giving survivors around 30 minutes before freezing to death, according to maritime and rescue websites.

  • Story Photo

    Maya, who is also a Greens MP, said the Swiss government was “hiding” behind its “banking secrecy” laws.
    “I am disappointed that the Swiss government is hiding behind the Swiss banking secrecy and thus helping to promote corruption in countries with weak governments.
    “There is no point in complaining about the destruction of the world’s tropical rainforests as long as Western countries assist corrupt families like the Taibs to enrich themselves by cutting down the forests,” she said in a statement.

  • Kimberly Wolf, a Gulf Coast resident and environmentalist affected by the BP oil disaster, was one of the featured speakers at the Spill into Washington D.C. rally on Labor Day weekend 2010. This is the first half of her speech from 9/5/10.

  • Story Photo

    Once again Taib’s dirty tricks against Sarawak Report and Radio Free Sarawak have spectacularly backfired!  

    In the past few hours it has emerged that the Chief Minister, along with his son-in-law, Sean Murray, was one of the clients who hired Bell Pottinger to alter Wikipedia entries about themselves, their companies, Sarawak… and, of course,Sarawak Report/Radio Free Sarawak!

    Bell Pottinger is the PR giant that has been at the centre of a scandal that has been gripping the UK since Tuesday.  The company, which first achieved fame as Margaret Thatcher’s favourite agency, has developed a reputation for professional ruthlessness and a willingness to do business with unpleasant clients.

  • Story Photo

    Since then, scientists have been working to answer questions many people have: What are the effects, short and long-term, on our ecosystem, public health and our seafood?

    At the Civic Center in Biloxi, three experts told a group of people we are far from realizing the extent of the damage.

    "Right now, the negative signs are piling up,” said Dr. Ed Cake who specializes in oysters.

    Dr. Scott Milroy is an oceanographer and professor at University of Southern Mississippi. He said the toxin levels in the species in the Gulf are higher than the FDA led us to believe and registered as unsafe through his studies following the spill.

    "What does it mean moving forward as far as how’s it going to affect those organisms long-term as far as survival - Whether they will reproduce in the next generation for shrimpers and oysters next year? Will they have a crop to go out and harvest? All of these questions are a little more concerning if you have a level of contamination in these species which was higher than people thought,” said Milroy.

    Dr. Ed Cake said the oyster industry has been decimated, and we can’t hope to see an improvement anytime soon.

    "So if were talking about what's happening here, we already know at 18 months there’s no recovery started. Even if the oysters begin setting in the spring, that will be another 5 years before that's crop of oysters to be ready, so were looking at least 5 years,” said Cake.

    Finally, there's the issue of human health.

    Dr. Wilma Surba has been studying the crude crisis' effects on people mentally and physically, and she has found serious problems.

    "It’s a lot of respiratory problems, skin rashes, skin lesions, decreased lung functions - problems that are acute in the beginning and are now very chronic problems,” said Surba.

    Each of the panelists said the effects of the oil spill cannot be fully realized just yet.

    Through private studies like theirs, they said we will find the lasting footprint of the oil spill.

  • The MSM has done their job successfully silencing the real news and as of August 10, 2011 you would never know that there is still an ongoing disaster being played out in the United States as there is still oil, dead sea creatures, petroleum covered birds and other contaminants washing up on the beaches surrounding the Gulf of Mexico as a result of the BP oil spill disaster. Dinise Rednour is a youtube user that tries her hardest to show her fellow Americans that the BP oil spill disaster is far from being over.

  • What makes Libya's Oil so special
    Libya's oil reserves are the largest in Africa and the ninth largest in the world. Libya possesses an estimated 44 billion barrels of oil underground. Historically the rate of extraction in Libya has been lower than average, prompting oil experts to view these large reserves as under-exploited. Libyan oil fields are under-developed compared to other countries like Saudi fields which are showing depletion. Statistically, in long-terms, it means there's more chance to extract oil from a new well in Libya, meaning more profits over the same investment. This kind of opportunity does not ring on the door bell of oil companies often. There's basically a much higher probability for oil companies to make a lot of money in Libya than anywhere else. While Libya managed to produce 1.6 million barrels per day under Gaddafi, production has come to a grinding halt since the rebel uprising.

  • Based on Brazilian government data showing the locations of active drill rigs, provided to us by some of our very helpful followers on Twitter, we conclude that Chevron's well was being drilled by the SEDCO 706 semisubmersible drill rig operated by - wait for it - Transocean.  Yes, the same company that operated the doomed Deepwater Horizon rig for BP.

    The MODIS/Aqua satellite image from NASA, above, was taken three days ago.  It shows an apparent oil slick originating from the drilling location and extending over 2,379 square kilometers (the south end of the slick gets entrained in an interesting clockwise eddy in the ocean currents).  At 1 micron thickness, that's a volume of 628,000 gallons (14,954 barrels) of oil.

  • --Scientists Fear Fresh BP Oil Surfacing at Deepwater Horizon Site Is Making Landfall 100 Miles away --As public concern escalates, the critically acclaimed oil spill documentary "The Big Fix" premieres Nov. 12th-14th in Los Angeles

     

    The Gulf Coast is reeling from reports that fresh oil rising from BP's Macondo Reservoir - ground zero of last year's massive spill - is coming ashore, again. Scientists have confirmed the existence of a "second wave" of BP oil fouling Gulf waters and beaches, poisoning marine life and wildlife, and posing a grave public health risk.

    While federal officials fail to acknowledge the problem, the situation in the Gulf worsens by the day. "It's deja vu all over again, in the very worst way," says New Orleans-based environmental attorney Stuart H. Smith. "We have fresh oil surfacing again at the Deepwater Horizon site.'

    Through rigorous "fingerprint" testing, LSU chemist Ed Overton confirmed that slicks sweeping across the Macondo Prospect since mid-August are made up of BP oil. "It is a dead-ringer match," Professor Overton said. "I was amazed that the ratios matched as good as they did."

    Chemical confirmation that the oil is from the Macondo wellsite provides vindication for those who pursued the truth for months despite a hard-nosed campaign of denial, intimidation and obfuscation executed by BP and its partners in the federal government. It is this very type of corporate-government "teamwork" that The Big Fix - the critically acclaimed oil spill documentary - portrays in riveting detail.

    Based on lab-certified test results of oil samples taken last month on Horn Island - a narrow strip of federally protected land just 12 miles off the Mississippi coast -researchers believe that fresh BP oil from the Macondo Prospect has made landfall more than 100 miles north of its origin.

  • Story Photo

    On the farms, the bears - mostly Asiatic black bears - are kept in tiny, cramped cages and milked for their bile through crude holes cut into the abdomen wall and the gall bladder.

    The wounds are deliberately left open, leaving the bears exposed to infection and disease. They are kept hungry and denied free access to water because this helps produce more bile.

    The farms are still found in many parts of China and other Asian countries, fuelling poaching and illegal trade in the animals.

    Dr Feng’s research shows that herbal alternatives and bile from other animals such as cattle - which can be collected cheaply at abbatoirs - can be more effective than bear bile.

    He will argue that growing opposition to animal substitutes will mean that, eventually, only plant substitutes will be acceptable. “The final choice will have to be to use plants to substitute bear bile,” he will tell the conference at Central Hall.

  • There were "many, many restrictions" within the well and other drilling equipment on the seafloor, Suttles said, dramatically slowing the release of oil. "This is a long way away from something more significant."

    Events soon proved Suttles' reassurances to be terribly misplaced. The leak rate at the time was far, far higher than BP portrayed to the Coast Guard -- more than 50,000 barrels per day from the moment the rig went down until the well was capped 87 days later, a government-led panel of physicists and engineers would conclude that August. At that rate, the leak had produced an Exxon Valdez-sized spill at least every five days.

    Today, more than a year after the spill ended, serious questions remain about BP's role in estimating the size of the undersea gusher.

    What is clear is that BP failed, throughout the event, to produce an accurate estimate of the size of the leak to the federal government or the public. Also readily apparent is the company's strong vested interest in downplaying the size of the spill: federal pollution laws stipulate fines as high as $4,300 for every barrel of oil unlawfully discharged into U.S. waters.

    Less obvious is precisely how and why the multinational energy giant fell so short in its efforts to determine the scale of the disaster. BP officials have adamantly denied deliberately lowballing the size of the spill, arguing that the company was overwhelmed by the technical challenge of measuring the deep-sea leak and claiming that the government shares equal responsibility for the early flow estimates.

    Yet a review by The Huffington Post of thousands of pages of documents, along with interviews with dozens of engineers, scientists and government officials, has uncovered new information challenging BP’s portrayal of its efforts to measure the leak -- and found the company may have withheld crucial data on the well’s flow rate from federal responders during the spill.

    According to federal officials, BP was solely responsible for producing the very first spill estimate of 1,000 barrels per day, a figure which led to a sense of complacency about the seriousness of the event among some federal and state responders at the outset of the disaster, the presidential commission on the oil spill concluded in January 2011. BP has never publicly acknowledged generating this figure and even the commission’s investigators could not determine the methodology used to produce it.

  • Story Photo

    -         BK Lim 10 October 2011 

    There are always solutions. It is only a matter of interest. Corporate interests take over when you don’t.

    Excessive monsoon rain for the last 3 months has drowned almost a third of Thailand's land mass; devastating some of the most productive farmland and putting at risk some of the most treasured ancient temples. The worst flood in 50 years dealt a dramatic blow to Japanese automobile, precision instruments and other industries because the nation is now an important global production base for numerous manufacturers. (19 Oct 2011 Japan Times).  Besides billions of dollars in damages and putting nearly 700,000 people temporarily out of work (23 Oct 2011, Seattlepi.com), the 2011 flood is a grim reminder that Mother Nature is not well and the worse is yet to come.

    Thailand is not the only country faced with massive flooding problems. Other South-east Asian countries particularly Vietnam and Philippines seem to bear the brunt of the ferocious typhoons late in the season. Northern Australia (Queensland) was the first to be hit with the worst flood of the century lasting 2 months; from Dec 2010 till Jan of 2011. The 2011 Brazil floods of January were considered the worst in the country's history. By 18 Jan. the floods had taken about 700 lives and 14,000 people made homeless mainly due to landslides. In the June-Sept 2011 period, flooding in China affected more than 4.8 million people, with 100,000 evacuated and 54 reported dead. The floods which occurred in central and southern parts of China were caused by heavy rain that inundated portions of 12 provinces, leaving other provinces still suffering a prolonged drought. A total of over 36 million people have been affected, killing at least 355 and with direct economic losses of nearly US$6.5 billion ~ Wikipedia.

    There seems to be more intense and widespread flooding less than a year after the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Is this a mere coincidence? Or is there more to it and the main stream media is not telling?

    As of late Oct 2011, the massive oil spill has not run its course yet. There has been has been numerous sighting of fresh oils and reported gas bubbles at locations where previous oil slick had been found. See figure 145-1 (U20111023) below. All these confirmed our previous prediction of long term climatic consequences following the mega oil spill disaster in the gulf.

    While massive flooding had occurred before; they have never occurred on such a massive scale over so many regions at such close intervals following a massive well blowout and a mega oil spill.

    Pro-oil scientists and geologists often cite that it is impossible for a tiny 10inch well spewing only 60,000 bpd (upgraded from the initial 1,000) for 87 days to have caused such havoc to the world’s climate. Their favorite line of argument: “No well blowout in history has caused such massive environmental havoc before”.  But did they emphasize the huge fundamental flaws in their argument?

    First and foremost there has never been a well blowout so deep underwater and so disastrous. Although the government officially capped it at 4.1 millions barrels, talks among industry circles put it possibly many times more. With the reservoir still leaking openly through the faulted pathways all around the gulf, the leaks will not stop until depletion. The Macondo recoverable reserves was estimated to be as low as 50 million barrels but a Forbes publication suggested it could more likely be a hefty 1 billion barrels.

    This means a lot more oil has yet to leak out through the broken geology if nothing is done. In a worst case scenario, the wide spread underground erosion sets off an unprecedented shallow crustal adjustments in the New Madrid fault zone. Like an unwinding spring coil releasing all the pent-up stresses accumulate over thousands of years. The Macondo prospect lies within the central pivoting point of the intra-plate tectonics and a “deep puncture” here is more disastrous than anywhere else in the gulf.   

    Further BP drilled not 1 but 3 wells (excluding the 2 relief wells) all within 1000 ft of each other. Even well A (showcased as the official blown well) spewed gas and oil continuously for 87 days. What about the blown crater at open well no# 3 (referred to as Well BE in the recently exposed videos) and several blowholes, dozens of vents along the fault lines and at the edges of the salt domes.

    The oil slick pattern covering an area of 580 sq miles in just 2 days after the 22 April 2nd explosion, could not have come from just one well at the south-western edge of the slick area. All evidences showed that a lot more oil (not just from well A alone) spewed out from the blown crater at the 3rd well, blow holes, vents and fissures along the fault lines and salt domes. With BP still carrying out grouting works till late Nov2010, the actual amount of oil spewed could have been 10 times more than conservative estimates.

    The main stream media has also not emphasized the massive amount of green house gases released into the atmosphere? The widespread vaporization of methane deposit (due to hot escaping oil) and toxic gasses leaking from the Macondo reservoir have not ceased for sure. After more than 15 months of relentless underground erosion (from reservoir level to the seafloor) the rate of toxic gas emissions is likely to have increased exponentially

    Methane is more potent than carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas affecting climate change. More heating capacity means higher evaporation rate on a larger scale; leading to higher water vapor content in the atmosphere. Higher moisture content in our atmosphere means more volatility because water-laden air traps more energy and does not allow uniform distribution of heat over the earth’s surface. This allows more frequent building up of intense high pressure zones in the ocean. At the same time, dry continental masses heat up faster creating very low pressure zones. The increase in ferocity and frequency of the hurricanes (or typhoons) in the summer months that follow is not coincidental but a logical consequence of that mega oil spill. Prolonged droughts and flooding periods will certainly increase and will create havoc with agricultural production the world over.

    To be fair, the world was already swamped with environmental pollution from the rapid pace of global industrialization, mining and urbanization. An oil spill and gas discharge on such a massive scale just turbo-charged and drove the world faster over the brink. Observational evidence shows a clear correlation between historic eruptions and subsequent years of cold climate conditions. See Geology SDSU.Edu on the examples of Laki (1783), Tambora (1815), Karkatau (1883) and Pinatubo (1991).  No doubt the volume of gases and other volcanic materials spewed during the eruptions are more massive within a few weeks but the Gulf’s mega oil spill disaster lasted much longer (at least 15 months longer and counting) and spread wider.

    Our present surface irrigation and drainage systems (designed and built decades ago) cannot cater for the inevitable sea level rise, let alone the heavier and longer rainfall periods. Perennial flooding and droughts with massive and destructive forest fires are clearly on the rise. Rapid and massive deforestation (by fires) will increase even more greenhouse gas emissions.

    We are thus on the threshold of a spiraling catastrophic climate cycle, thanks to mega oil spill and continuing massive gas discharge which has pushed us prematurely into this climatic roller-coaster ride.  If we do nothing now, more farmland, nuclear power plants and cities are going to be flooded sooner or later.  Is there a solution? You bet there is but corporate profit-oriented oil-centric interests are not willing to lose their lucrative multi-billion global business. The mega oil spill and HAARP have shown us that altering the earth’s climate is not that impossible. We should be able to reverse back the damage done not only by the Gulf’s disaster but from years of pollution and abuse of Mother Nature. It is time we Hydro-Balance Mother Nature back to health.

    Why Hydro-Balancing?

    Water cover 70% of the planet’s surface. A lot more is present within the earth’s crust than currently thought of. We have always assumed the hydrologic cycle to be balanced as illustrated below:

    The hydrologic cycle is a conceptual model that describes the storage and movement of water between the biosphere, atmosphere, lithosphere, and the hydrosphere (see Figure 8b-1). Water on this planet can be stored in any one of the following reservoirs: atmosphere, oceans, lakes, rivers, soils, glaciers, snowfields, and groundwater.

    Figure 8b-1: Hydrologic Cycle. (from http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/8b.html)

    Water moves from one reservoir to another by way of processes like evaporation, condensation, precipitation, deposition, runoff, infiltration, sublimation, transpiration, melting, and groundwater flow. The oceans supply most of the evaporated water found in the atmosphere. Of this evaporated water, only 91% of it is returned to the ocean basins by way of precipitation. The remaining 9% is transported to areas over landmasses where climatological factors induce the formation of precipitation. The resulting imbalance between rates of evaporation and precipitation over land and ocean is corrected by runoff and groundwater flow to the oceans.

    As you can see on this USGS website on NATURAL PROCESSES OF GROUND-WATER AND SURFACE-WATER INTERACTION (http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/circ1139/htdocs/natural_processes_of_ground.htm) much of the recharge groundwater never penetrate deep into the landmass except for some special conditions such as artesian aquifers.

     

    Although most of the surface water is evaporated and falls back to ground, that water does not return to the inner continental mass or deep hydrosphere. Deep groundwater reservoirs were never replenished. For more than 2,000 years there has been a net loss of water (from the deep hydrosphere) and net gain in our surface hydrosphere (ocean, lakes, rivers, atmosphere and upper groundwater). Our hydrologic cycle was never balanced as we blindly assumed.

    Our surface hydrosphere is like an enclosed glass container. Once the water enters it, it cannot escape. There is thus an increasing level of water content in the surface hydrosphere with increasingly disastrous heavy rainfalls and prolonged droughts. The Gulf's mega contribution in green house gasses would have mattered less, if not for the already imbalanced hydrosphere.

    The water within the surface has nowhere to go but back into the ocean and the rain cycle repeats itself while the deserts within the continental land mass become drier and drier. Drying continental masses are also much lighter as air replaces water. Water is 781.25 times heavier than air.  1 cubic metre of water at 4 deg Celsius weighs 1000kg or 1 metric ton. Naturally the increase in sea level is less noticeable being accompanied by isostatic adjustments of the lighter continental mass. A 10m sandstone bed over 1sq. km could contain as much as 2 million cu.metres of water. Replacing even 50% of the water content with air would reduce the weight of the same sandstone bed by 998,720 tons for each 1 million cu.metres of water replaced. Any wonder why the world’s larges dam with 39.3 cu.km capacity would cause earthquakes, cracks and landslides. The difference in weight (heavier) is a staggering 39.25 million tons.

    http://naturalplane.blogspot.com/2010/05/three-gorges-dam-causing-earthquakes.html

    Officials dismissed the first landslides as the foreseeable side-effects of a massive dam project. They are not so dismissive now. A total of 9,324 potentially dangerous sites have been identified. Geologists working midway down the reservoir have found 700 around one town alone on the north bank. Experts say the landslides could go on for 20 years as a huge settlement of earth and water takes shape. It will cost China more than £5 billion to solve all this. A special budget is being worked out inside the opaque bureaucracy that controls the state’s megaprojects.

    The global sea level rise is not just the melting of the polar caps but increasing water content in the surface hydrosphere. A large part of that increase came gradually from the deep continental masses. Geologic records tell us that sea level in the past had been as high as 200 to 250m above the present level. How much is due to isostatic adjustment is debatable. In many past marine surveys, I was amazed at the recoveries of partially decayed and some well-preserved wood fragments in the core samples recovered at the edges of the present continental shelf. This could only mean the present continental shelf edges at 150-200m depths were once the estuarine and river mouths when global sea level receded as low as 200 m from the present sea level. Other geological evidences will be discussed in later postings. We are now roughly in the mid level of historic global sea level highs and lows.

    Climate scientists have always estimated global sea level rise as 1.5 – 2.0 mm / year ~ www.climate.org/topics/sea-level/index.html. But like everything else this was estimated over the last 100 years. Is the increase in sea level gradual or occurs in sudden jumps of 2 to 10m each time the atmosphere decides to unload its excess water load? Just like the carbon sink models, the hydro sink in the hydrosphere will absorbed the increase in water content until full capacity is reached. It then dumps the excess load; resulting in a sudden rise. We may be lulled into a false sense of security with the gradual rise theory. Were the biblical great floods (commonly told in other cultural histories as well) the result of this sudden and hefty rise in sea levels? If such floods occurred 2,000 – 4,000 years ago, then such great floods may be due within our present life time.

    Like all long term illnesses, the pressing problems of massive flooding cannot be tackled overnight. By the time massive flooding occurs, it is too later to handle the problems of draining massive quantities of water. The solution cannot also drain the rivers dry and should be able to return the stored water for use during prolonged droughts automatically. Each hydro-channelling scheme should be a building block towards the global solution of reducing our energy dependence on Oil and the excessive water vapor in our surface hydrosphere. The faster governments around the world adopt the principles of hydro-balancing with such simple eco-friendly geological solutions the faster Mother Nature is nursed back to health.

    Instead of wasteful overproduction of cars and consumer goods, over-building of houses, dams and roads, over-mining of resources and destructive drilling / fracking exploration, just to keep the economy going, governments should look into channeling valuable human and financial resources into productive dual-use deep water wells, underground drainage channels to supplement and adapt available geological resources to recycle water back into the deep hydrosphere. Besides providing an economic boost with high employment, these master solutions tackle multiple problems at the very root level, water the basis of life.

    Regional fault zones and deep aquifers (porous geological formations) can be easily converted into valuable water recycling/transport channels, water store and supplies, clean of toxic cancer-causing agents. Instead of building expensive filtration plants, why not allow natural filtration processes take their course in recycling our waste water into fresh mineral water deep within the rock formation. Civilisation should fit into the nature’s way of cycling water, not upset it with artificial manufacturing processes with compounded problems.

    Massive hydro-dams, coastal tidal barriers, floodgates and dredging/deepening of waterways are not long term solutions as we do not remove the excess water from the surface hydrosphere. Instead we should have distributed flood control vertical drains to complement existing surface drainage system. The vertical drains do not flow back to the rivers (as in the present system causing congestion during peak flows) but connect back to the deep hydrosphere through the regional faults. With millions of cubic metres of freshwater diverted back to the continental interior through a network of faults, the amount of fresh water flows into the sea is not only reduced. New industries capitalizing on renewable sources of energy, automatic distributed urban flood-control schemes, cost-effective irrigation schemes to water the deserts and prevent massive forest fires could spring up. The billions of dollars saved from future environmental carnage should be sufficient to finance nation-wide construction. The construction boom in underground channeling projects and future increase in agricultural production are bonuses.

    Long Term Eco-friendly geological solution to Thailand flooding woes.

    As with the rest of the world, Thailand’s irrigation and flood control system has been built on the basic principle of water storage during the wet monsoon seasons and controlled release during the dry seasons for year round agriculture. This is done through a network of irrigation canals, hydro-power dams and flood-control sluice gates. There are also millions of shallow water wells, many of which had not been used in recent years. All surface runoff in the northern part of Thailand eventually flow into the four main rivers (Nan, Ping, Yom & Wang) which converged into the Menam Chao Phraya at Nakkon Sawan, approximately 140 miles from Bangkok.

    An important rice bowl of the world, Thailand’s agricultural production depends on a regulated supply of water all year round. Bangkok, the commercial heart and capital, sits at the river mouth the Menam Chao Phraya. With a basin of 61,931 sq miles and a total length of 231 miles, it discharges an average of 718 cu.m of water per second (max: 5,960 cu.m/s) into the Gulf of Thailand. (source Wikipedia).

    The floods since July 2011 had killed 270 people and had affected 8.2 million people in 60 of Thailand’s 77 provinces; 30 of which are currently inundated. Officials at the Agriculture Ministry said 1.17 million hectares of rice fields might be damaged. Thailand, the world's biggest rice exporter, has about 10.9 million hectares planted with the staple grain. Another 283,279 hectares of land planted with other crops is also likely to have suffered damage, the ministry said. Bank of Thailand governor PrasarnTrairatvorakul said a preliminary estimate by the central bank shows economic losses from flooding that began in late July range from $1.9 billion to $2.6 billion USD.

    (cbc.ca/news/2011/10/11/thailand-flooding.html)

    BANGKOK, October 27, 2011 (AFP) - Thousands of nervous Bangkok residents flocked to bus, rail and air terminals Thursday while heavy traffic snaked out of the sprawling Thai capital in an exodus from a mass of approaching floodwater. Water was seeping into central areas of the city of 12 million people, entering the grounds of the Grand Palace after the Chao Phraya river overflowed at high tide, but most of downtown Bangkok was still dry.

    Many residents hunkered down in their homes, surrounded by sandbags or in some cases even hastily erected concrete block walls, after the government ordered a five-day holiday for 21 provinces including Bangkok from Thursday. "It's a crisis, because if we try to resist this massive amount of floodwater, a force of nature, we won't win," said a teary-eyed Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra, facing a major test of her two-month-old leadership.

    The Nation October 27, 2011 12:59 pm BANGKOK:  A Dutch expert on flooding, Adri Verwey, said yesterday the worst case scenario for Bangkok was that "extensive areas" of the capital could be submerged under more than one metre of water, if dykes are breached in many areas. Verwey, who was sent by the government of the Netherlands to assist the Thai government warned that Sukhumvit and other low-lying areas are especially prone - though it will take days for the water to reach inner Bangkok. "The levy is very important," he told The Nation and a small group of foreign journalists at Flood Relief Operation Centre (FROC) in Don Mueang airport which itself is now being visited by some flood water. Verway said this coming weekend would be "most crucial" with the expected strong tide. "I pity the Thai people," he said, adding that a lot of tasks will be awaiting the Kingdom in the recovery process. "You have this failure already. You can expect quite a few more."

    The dilemma of a hydro dam control system

    When the abnormally heavy rain started in mid July, the dams continued to retain water as per normal. No one could forecast 3 months ahead the heavy downpour would continue. By 2nd Oct 2011, 11 of the country’s 26 major dams had contained more water than their official capacity while others were 82 to 99 percent full according to the Royal Irrigation Department. By August many of the Northern provinces had been flooded. To release even more water would have exacerbate an already disastrous situation. At that time many had already blamed their flood woes on the irrigation department for releasing too much water.

    Now that the flood waters had flowed down to Bangkok’s flood canals, many residents were questioning whether the Royal Irrigation Department was too slow in reacting. But it was a “Damn if you do and Damn if you don’t” predicament.

    The flood problem at Bangkok is worsened during the high tide periods when the discharge into the sea is impeded. Water that does not flow can cause a lot of damage to the canals and levees which were not designed to withstand high pressure. With nowhere to flow, the flood waters could take weeks to subside provided no new flood waters flow down the Chao Phraya.

    So while the problem could have been solved and prevented months ago, it is human nature not to do so until it is too late. So will the rest of the world. Forget the global warming hoax and the punishing carbon tax solutions. They do not solve the world’s immediate environmental problems such as the one facing Thailand or any flood and drought prone countries right now.

    When it rains, it pours

    Hydro-dams can only control water when the water is still in the catchment area and not after the flood waters had reached the flood plains. Most typhoons, like Nesat and Nalgae dumped much of their rain load on the fluvial plains outside the control of hydro dams. Most existing drainage systems converge and drain into the main fluvial channels. This is like causing a massive traffic jam during peak flows and they all flow southwards towards Bangkok. With low elevation, there is not much gradient to speed up the water flow. Even if there is, the flood water will accumulate at the next flat zone. Our present surface drainage system is thus like a serial, linear system; never suitable to cater for peak flows during floods.

    To solve our flooding woes, our fundamental concept of a converging system must radically change to a divergent distributed system (a complete reversal). In order to do that

    1. there need to be alternative water outlets, not just the sea
    2. any excess water above the optimum flow level of the main channels must be automatically removed so that the volume of water can never reach the danger level of flooding (tackling the problem at root level before it gets too massive to handle)
    3. water in the alternative outlet can be stored for extraction during the dry period or channel out to areas in need of water.

    Nature has already provided us with a ready made solution. All we need to do is to harness the enormous potential of our natural resources, hundreds to thousands of metres below us. Drill large deep wells into the highly fractured fault zones to act as vertical and inclined channels to the suitable porous rock formations for massive storage.  Each country will need to design their own distributed network of underground channels (a combination of connecting tunnels and suitable fault zones) to interconnect the aquifers and deeper formations based on their respective geological structures and stratigraphy.  

    Some preliminary quantitative food for thoughts.

    At 1m flood height over an area 1sq km, the volume of flood water is 1 million cu.metres.  A sandstone bed 10 m thick with 20% porosity over 1 sq km area, has the capacity to store an equivalent of 1 million cu.metres of water assuming 50% impermeability. In addition a highly permeable fault zone with just 30% porosity (100m wide x 1km length x 1 km depth) could store as much as 30 million cu.metres of water. As these regional fault zones run for miles into the interior of the continental mass, their storage and transport capacity is potentially enormous. Clearly suitable geologic conditions can be utilized as deep underground resource (water store) with the appropriate adaptations. See illustrations in figures #7001a to c.

    If excess water is continually removed as soon as it rises above the optimum main channel level, there is no need to actively pump the water into the wells. There can be various contraptions to generate electricity as the water flows downwards under gravity. These wells can have triple purposes; drain excess water into the underground store, generate electricity and provide fresh water sources during droughts.

    As contingency (in the event of an unforeseen accidental flood outside the main channels; depending on the setup) water from the flooded area can be pumped into the nearest series of wells. With 5 wells per sq km and a conservative discharge rate of 20,000 cu m /day/well, it would take 10 days to clear 1 million cu.metres of water by pumping the water into the wells. The discharge rate can be improved by various means such as increasing the diameter and depth of the wells. The money to be spent on building more irrigation canals and flood control dams (now proven to be ineffective), can be better spent on these vertical dual purpose deep wells. With faster construction periods (than dam construction) and the immediate availability of the natural geological resources, a system of vertical wells can be installed progressively to prevent the next catastrophic flooding. With the unpredictable climate change following the gulf’s mega oil spill disaster, the next flood in your neighborhood could be just around the corner.  Prevention is definitely better and less costly than cure. Those who had experienced the floods first hand and had suffered personal losses of loved ones & irreplaceable valuables, the aftermath clean-up of the disaster is as traumatic as the tragedies themselves.  

    For the love of mankind, for the prevention of such mega disastrous tragedies and for the compassion of those who had suffered immense losses, let us all work together to prevent such massive destruction of lives and properties. It is in our interests to act together in unison. Remember corporate interests take over when you don’t.

  • Story Photo
    • BK Lim 18 Oct 2011

    Answers to the “Medivac Delay question” raise even more questions; posing serious doubts whether the grounding of the USS San Francisco could even occurred at Micronesia on 8 Jan 2005. Some details of the official-released eye-witnesses' accounts and time-line of events seem to better fit a submarine accident at the time of the 11am (Guam Time) mega quake, offshore Sumatra on 26 Dec 2004, than the accident at Micronesia.

    First we examine the case for the purported accident at Micronesia. The official reasons given for the delayed medivac/rescue operation were

    the crash location was too far (360 n_miles) and outside the 60S Knighthawk (return trip) 225 n mile range. The navy had to wait until the beleaguered submarine was within range to mount the heli medivac rescue.

  • the bad sea state on 8 Jan 2005. The heli medivac/rescue operation had to be called off.

  • Figure 164-6 shows an official release picture of the helicopter MH-60S Knighthawk, transferring medical personnel to the USS San Francisco on the morning of 9 Jan 2005. The location of the chopper transfer was not stated. We can only assume it was within the chopper 2-way range of 225 nautical miles from Guam.

    As with all fakes, scratch the surface and you see the evidence. The officially-released eye-witnesses' accounts, the purported liberty port call to Brisbane, the high speed collision and now the medivac delay, all did not stand up to scrutiny.

    The delayed medivac (actually there was none on official record) or heli-transfer of medical personnel on 9 Jan 2005 appeared to be just a photo-op for public consumption. There was evidently no multiple attempts at evacuating the seriously injured (medivac) for such a major accident that purportedly occurred less than 24 hours ago on 9 Jan. Would Ashley's shipmates cursed and cried in frustration if they had been surrounded by rescue vessels ready to render any assistance and help? No. So this account of frustration was written when the USS San Francisco was still alone in the open ocean.

    The tight quarters made it difficult to get Ashley off the boat to a helicopter that could take him to a hospital in Guam. Crewmen spent the night removing railings and lockers to clear a path to the only hatch considered safe to open. The next morning, they threaded Ashley's stretcher through small compartments and up narrow ladders, but the bridge hatch wouldn't open far enough to let it out. Some of his shipmates cursed and cried in frustration. Cooter died without regaining consciousness, 25½ hours after the accident.

    To recap, (we said in part 3) an immediate medivac / rescue operation to render urgent medical attention to 23 seriously injured men would have been top priority in any major accident whether in Micronesia or offshore Sumatra. The fact that the navy did not rush military, medical and engineering assistance to the grounded multi-billion nuclear submarine just 360 n_miles away from its Guam base is one big puzzling mystery.

    The navy owes it to the American public and all countries badly affected by the 2004 tsunami the truth.

    Micronesia is one of US protectorate island nation in the Pacific. So any excuse of obtaining official permission to enter Micronesia's airspace or territorial waters was just humbugs. Were permission ever sought when the USS San Francisco was running covert underwater operations in Asia or just before the “crash” on 8 January 2005?

    The 2004 tsunami caught the world by surprise but not the US Navy. Apparently, they had the foresight to prepare a heavily armed and engineering armada for such a “humanitarian mission” 12 months before the most devastating tsunami in human history.

    Did the Bush-Cheney administration suddenly turned soft on the War-On-Terror, giving preferential treatment to the poor muslim victims in Aceh (accused by Bush to be extremist terrorists) over the US servicemen in Micronesia? The epicentre of the quake was more than 2,800 n_miles from Guam while the purported crash location in Micronesia a mere 360 n_miles.

    Even military experts were perplexed. It was a mystery then and still a mystery now, more than 7 years later. The only plausible explanation; the Bush-Cheney administration lied to distance USS San Francisco's covert operation and involvement in the 2004 quake-tsunami. It would explain why Strike Force 5 armada was ready to sail on the instant. Elementary, my dear Watson!

    16 July 2005 http://www.clubconspiracy.com/forum/f30/nuclear-bomb-caused-12-26-04-a-884.html

    Needless to say the Australians were merely the advance party, soon to be joined by a curiously well prepared and equipped U.S. Military...........why they had been spending a whole year training for a "Humanitarian Mission", when the whole point of the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps is normally to kill people in very large numbers.

    As if by magic, the Pentagon managed to have two battle groups ready to sail at an instant's notice from Hong Kong and Guam during the normally chaotic Christmas to New Year period. The next bit was superbly orchestrated, because it took place at sea, far away from the prying eyes of dock spies or imaginary KGB agents. But oops, first you have to know who was involved.

    Out of Hong Kong rushed team one, comprised of the nuclear-powered USS Abraham Lincoln and her escort vessels, while the far more interesting team two rushed out of Guam, led by the USS Bonhomme Richard, a marine amphibious assault carrier crammed to the gunwales with gun-toting wooden tops. And that is not all, believe me, because the Bonhomme Richard is in fact leading a veritable armada known as "Expeditionary Strike Group 5". Flagship USS Bonhomme Richard is accompanied by the U.S.S. Duluth, an amphibious transport dock vessel; the USS Rushmore, a landing ship dock; the guided missile cruiser USS Bunker Hill, guided missile destroyer USS Milius, and the guided missile frigate USS Thach.

    To take care of the underwater side of things they are joined by the nuclear hunter-killer submarine USS Pasadena, while the U.S. Coast Guard's high-endurance cutter Munro is also tagging along, presumably to deal with Asian Customs and Excise.

    Now then, though 'Strike Group 5' may be toting enough nuclear weapons to destroy half of the known world, and the title is perhaps lacking when viewed from a strictly humanitarian perspective, engineer chief Staff Sgt. Julio C. Dominguez says otherwise: "The Marine Service Support Group has been preparing for a humanitarian mission of this type for about 12 months now, and is more prepared for an actual mission". Well, OK chief, but didn't you ask why you were being trained for a mysterious humanitarian mission a year before it actually happened, especially when your day job is normally shooting Muslims full of holes?

    The really sneaky (inexplicable) bit came as both battle groups entered the Indian Ocean. The USS Abraham Lincoln looked about as innocent as a carrier with 70 attack planes can look, but was already carrying 2,000 marines instead of her normal complement of around 500. That is a huge amount of grunt firepower to put on the deserted streets of Banda Aceh, especially when Wall Street normally expects these marines to die quietly for Zion in Iraq. Now then, how did they know the extra marines would be needed before team one left Hong Kong, because the surplus 1,500 marines were certainly not just standing around on Kowloon dock waiting to hitch a ride.

    Then while the two battle groups (apparently) headed in two different directions across the deserted Indian Ocean, an even stranger event took place. Though Expeditionary Strike Group 5 (Humanitarian) was supposed to help the folks in Sri Lanka, the combat marines aboard the USS Bonhomme Richard transferred to amphibious transport dock vessel U.S.S. Duluth, which then split from ESG-5 and headed towards team one. So without the Indonesians really being aware of it, the (relatively) harmless and Bulky aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln has been used to screen the arrival of at least 3,500 heavily-armed US Marines in tiny Aceh Province.

    Now if you had read part 3 and understood the navy's priorities, you would come to the same conclusion as we had. The Navy had no intention whatsoever of sending the medical / rescue helicopter to the purported crash location at Micronesia immediately after receiving news of the accident on 8 Jan 2005. The accident was a fake to cover the real accident somewhere else.

    MH-60S Knighthawk helicopter round-trip range limited to 225 n_miles.

    The round-trip limitation of 225 n_miles applies to open sea rescue operations with no landing facilities nearby. In offshore medivac / rescue operations, the helicopter would make use of nearby platforms or drilling vessels to make intermediate landing & refueling. Thus the one-way range of 450n_miles should be sufficient to reach the crash location and the nearby islands for refueling on the return journey. Even the option of launching the helicopter from a vessel is better than waiting 22 hours for the beleaguered submarine to leave the sheltered crash location and making a risky trip in the open ocean just to come within chopper range. The sea state in an open ocean can never be better than inter-island sea.

    In short there were several options including mid-air refueling, to make this limited round-trip range of 225 n_miles totally irrelevant. The helicopter transfer on 9 Jan was made between 200-230 n_miles from Guam, to underscore that point.

    If we apply the same helicopter rescue/medivac operation to an accident near the epicentre of the 2004 quake offshore Sumatra, again it makes sense. At 30 knots and some 25 hours later, the USS Abraham Lincoln leaving from Hong Kong would have been in range to send choppers to the crash location near Aceh. Refuelling mid-air, the choppers would have been able to reach the beleaguered submarine about 30 hours after the accident. These are just some conservative ball estimates. The US Navy rapid response system could certainly do better than that.

    It thus makes donkey sense for the Guam Naval Base Command to instruct the badly damaged USS San Francisco with more than 70 injured crew and heavily under-manned sub (1 in 5 unmanned) to make it home on its own. If they could instantly deploy an armada of carriers and its armed escorts to “assist Aceh victims” as we had seen 2 weeks earlier why not Micronesia?

    So what happened to the “we have been training for this rescue mission for the last 12 months” bull$hit? Either the US Navy value the “humanitarian rescue of the tsunami victims” over the :USS San Francisco & her crew”, or the accident at Micronesia was a fake meant to cover-up the real accident offshore Aceh.

    Chopper medivac delayed by bad weather.

    On the surface this again looks like a credible excuse. But dig deeper, you will see that this was irrelevant at the time of the decision.

    First there was no mention of adverse weather at the time of the accidental grounding or in the 12hours after. The first mention of deteriorating weather was on Sunday, 9 Jan 2005. This is to be expected. Inter-island water is always calmer than open ocean. If given a choice for rendezvous and medivac operations, one would always chose the former. Did the Guam Naval commander not know this? Of course he did. If the USS San Francisco was really grounded at Micronesia, any sane Naval Commander would have ordered the damaged submarine to stay put while an armada of vessels would be dispatched immediately to the crash location. Just as they did with the “instant humanitarian mission” which mobilised simultaneously out of Hong Kong and Guam. One is a fake and one is real. There is no prize for guessing which one was the real accident.

    Checking the different witnesses accounts, the original accounts of the accident offshore Sumatra on 26 Dec 2004 appeared to have been edited to fit the fake accident in Micronesia on 8 Jan 2005. Another coincidence and conspiracy? Think again.

    Then, poor weather on Sunday forced the captain to bring all his crewmen down from the bridge out of fear that any additional water coming down the hatch would cut further into the sub's limited buoyancy.

    “During the memorial and viewing on Saturday, CSS-15 provided a video from the coast guard of us on the surface and the SEAL/Dr. medical team being helo'd in, the family had this video played on 2 screens in thebackground. It was a sobering reminder of what a hard woman the ocean can be. We had to call off the helo because of the sea state, it was becoming too dangerous for the aircraft, we almost hit it with the sail a couple of times.

    The sea would not allow us to medivac in our condition and that sea state.

    There was no mention of chopper rescue/medivac operations at all in the witnesses' accounts especially the skipper's; immediately after the fake accident on 8 Jan. It would have been discussed (as in all accidents) together with the weather conditions. If the weather did not permit, it would have been an important note in the witnesses' accounts. These are some of the most important questions in any emergency besides location (Lat & Long), casualties, extend of damage and emergency medical, essential equipment and parts supplies to be flown in as soon as possible. It is possible that this long list might not be made public, but if adverse weather had been a real factor, the witnesses' accounts couldn't have missed it.

    On the other hand DOOW's account clearly stated that the sea state at that time was too rough for the chopper transfer. Now you have to wonder whether he was referring to the chopper transfer operation on 9 January or the attempt heli rescue some 30 hours after the 11am (Guam time) 26 Dec 2004 quake. Read the caption accompanying the photo of the heli transfer in fig 164-6 carefully. The heli-transfer was never aborted. There was no mention of “calling off the helo” because of bad sea state.

    The weather on the morning of 9 Jan was certainly not calm flat but it was not real choppy either. The fact that the heli transfer was not aborted on 9 Jan confirms that the sea state was not bad enough for the operation to be aborted. So did DOOW lie?

    Probably not, but the spin writer who was not on the vessel. Otherwise he could not have made that kind of slip. He took a true account of what had happened on the 27 or 28 of Dec 2004 and transplanted it to the 9 Jan 2005 heli transfer. Do you see the slip?

    It was a sobering reminder of what a hard woman the ocean can be. We had to call off the helo because of the sea state, it was becoming too dangerous for the aircraft, we almost hit it with the sail a couple of times.

    The sea would not allow us to medivac in our condition and that sea state.”

    The above account describes more of a despair than joy. Despair at seeing the helicopters flying away as the sun sets and the uncertainty of waiting for the next chopper rescue. It is a typical disappointment many would have felt at the first sight of help that had to be aborted due to dangerous sea conditions; darkness and bad sea state. Imagine 30 hours of harrowing survival experience at sea; thousand of miles away from home. On 27 Dec 2004, the men were homesick, badly injured and desperate, not knowing whether they would be able to see their loved ones again.

    On 9 Jan, the beleaguered submarine was already escorted by at least 2 surface vessels when the chopper arrived. It was also a time of rejoice being a mere 200 odd n_miles from home. See the difference? If you had spent months at sea in a confined space, you understand the joy and relief on the last leg of the return journey. That magical feeling that everything is going to be alright.

    That despair feelings would better fit a damaged submarine stranded in an open ocean offshore Indonesia in Dec 2004. The DOOW was probably describing an even worse sea state on 27 Dec 2004, not the sea state on the morning of 9 Jan 2005. It was certainly not bad enough to cancel the heli transfer. If there was no medivac on 9 Jan, it was because there was no necessity. The boat would be in port the next day.

    But in the hours after the first chopper was sighted on 27 Dec evening, the medivac had to be postponed till the next morning after darkness set in. The injured crew had to spend another night in poor weather and in fear. See the perfect fit in the original description to the real emergency situation in a real accident that happened on 26 Dec 2004.

    Then, poor weather on Sunday forced the captain to bring all his crewmen down from the bridge out of fear that any additional water coming down the hatch would cut further into the sub's limited buoyancy.

    Note the "deteriorating weather" on the night of 9 Jan. Deteriorating means getting worse. That means on the 8 Jan the weather was better and not even considered in the decision not to send the medivac chopper. This weather issue was only an after thought to justify the medivac delay by almost 1 day.

    If the medivac was called off or aborted on 8 Jan due to bad weather that means the heli had arrived and returned to Guam. Eye witness accounts could not have missed out such an important event in a tragedy.

    Further if the weather at the crash location (sheltered by islands around it) was already bad then the sea state would have been worse in the open Pacific. Any seaman would know that. So why increase the risk and made things worse? A skipper with 19 years of exemplary service could not be this bad even if he tried.

    Given the deteriorating factor and the calmer inter island seas, the weather was definitely not an issue. So assuming even the weather was bad (just for argument sake), it would not hurt to fly the choppers to the nearby islands to wait for suitable weather. Unless a major storm was brewing (and that was not the case as shown by the photo), the weather (sea states) picks up and go down in hours. Sending a medical team to wait for a few hours definitely beat chopper transfer in the open sea and the 52 hours journey. If indeed the weather was deteriorating, there was even more reason to stay within the inter-island sea.

    Conflicting Accounts on the time of Allen Ashley's passing.

    I knew that Ash was severly injured and brought to the messdecks, he was one of my best men, and one of our best sailors onboard, he was like a son to me. After surfacing I was the control room supervisor, I had a boat to keep on the surface and fight and knew that if I went below to see how he was doing, it would teeter me on the brink of something that the ship did not need, the ship needed somebody who knew her.

    The damage to our sailors was almost all from them impacting into the equipment. The crew is a testament to training and watch team backup. When a casualty occurs, you fight like you train, and train like you fight. It kept us alive during that 2+day period.

    050109-N-0000X-001 Pacific Ocean (Jan. 9, 2005) – An MH-60S Knighthawk helicopter, assigned to the “Providers” of Helicopter Combat Support Squadron Five (HC-5), transfers medical personnel to USS San Francisco (SSN 711) located south of Guam, following an underwater collision, Jan. 8. Medical personnel were rushed to the Los Angeles attack submarine once it was within range to assist the ship’s independent duty Corpsman in providing urgent treatment to injured crew members. Regrettably, Machinist Mate 2nd Class Allen Ashley died soon after the medical team’s arrival from massive head injuries. U.S. Navy photo (RELEASED)

    HONOLULU, Jan. 9 — A sailor injured aboard a nuclear submarine that ran aground about 350 miles south of Guam died Sunday, the Navy said. Twenty-three other crew members were being treated for injuries.The USS San Francisco was headed back to its home port in Guam after sustaining severe damage on Saturday.

    The incident was under investigation, said Jon Yoshishige, a spokesman for the Pacific Fleet based at Pearl Harbor. The name of the sailor who died was being withheld pending a mandatory 24-hour waiting period, the Navy said. The sailor's next of kin had been notified. Lt. j.g. Adam Clampitt of the Pacific Fleet offered condolences early Sunday, saying ''anytime we lose a shipmate, it's a loss to the Navy.''

    Ashley, who was a machinist mate, suffered "significant trauma to the head" while he was working in one of the ship's engineering spaces, said Lt. Cmdr. Jeff Davis, spokesman for the U.S. Navy Pacific Submarine Force. He was initially in critical condition, but died Sunday afternoon. Ashley's family members have been notified of his death, but they are off island, Davis said.

    At 11:42 a.m. the following day, some of the sailors had begun to line up outside the mess deck for a lunch of hamburgers, french fries and baked beans. The duty watch had just changed, and Hutson was in the machinery room going over paperwork with a shipmate. Then the boat hit a bump. “We had the first little shudder, and then a second one,” Hutson said. “The second hit, I said, 'We're in trouble.' ” The San Francisco, cruising at 38 mph, ground to a halt, throwing Hutson several feet and slamming him against some machinery. Two officers fell in front of him.

    All the while, Cooter fought like the brave Sailor he was. Defying the odds, he lived far longer than expected for someone with his injuries. He peacefully left us the under the care of a Navy Doctor who had arrived aboard from a daring helicopter transfer just a few hours earlier.

    By official account, Allen Ashley died on Sunday afternoon 9 Jan 2005 after the “Emergency medical personnel, including a Naval Hospital Guam surgeon, Undersea Medical Officer and Independent Duty Corpsmen, arrived on the ship on the morning of 9 Jan via helicopter transfer to provide immediate medical care and prepare the crew member for medical evacuation on the morning of 9 January. Unfortunately, the sailor's condition deteriorated and he died onboard while under the care of the embarked physicians. Just moments prior to the sailors death, I spoke with the Sailor's father in preparation for their pending travel from Ohio to the West Pacific to see their Son. Since then I have passed on to his Dad my condolences on their son's death and reassured them their son's remains would be treated with utmost respect and dignity.”

    Another account stated that Lt.J.G. Adam Clampitt offered condolences early Sunday even before Ashley had actually passed away in the afternoon; the official time 13:13 hrs 9 Jan 2005.

    The sailor's next of kin had been notified. Lt. j.g. Adam Clampitt of the Pacific Fleet offered condolences early Sunday

    Akin said “hours later, a helicopter would bring a surgeon from Guam to try to treat Ashley, but it was to no avail. Ashley died the next day.” If the heli transfer was on 9 Jan, that means Ashley died on 10 Jan when the USS San Francisco was already in port. Makes one wonder why all the conflicting versions.

    Once Akin saw the extent of Ashley's wounds, he evacuated the other injured sailors into another improvised infirmary and kept Ashley, who was still alive but critically injured, in the mess hall. Hours later, a helicopter would bring a surgeon from Guam to try to treat Ashley, but it was to no avail. Ashley died the next day.

    Was Akin referring to an earlier chopper rescue on 27 Dec 2004? The chopper medivac might have been too dangerous and had to be aborted. But it was still possible to transfer medical expertise onboard. That could explain why 23 of the critically injured crew except 3 did not need hospitalisation. Could they have recovered so fast from such a serious accident in 2 days?

    If they were injured on 26 Dec 2004 and had been treated by the best field medical experts then it makes sense for the critically injured to recover in 2 weeks. There is no necessity to invoke “amazing recovery in 2 days” miracles. They were injured on a sinister covert operation that killed 230,000 innocent victims. Surely God would not approve let alone bless them with a miraculous recovery. Yes even if they were just following orders as all good soldiers do. Perhaps that is why God spared them so that 7 years later they could confess they have been ordered to lie by those higher in ranks.

    Almost two dozen others were injured so badly they could not perform their duties, though within days most were treated and released from the hospital in Guam. Most of the crew were treated for some injury.

    Dozens of crew members began coming in with injuries – broken bones, smashed faces, dislocated bones, head trauma, bruises, cuts, lacerations; in all, 70 sailors had sustained wounds.

    Machinist Mate 3rd Class Joseph Ashley was killed when he struck his head on a large pump. Almost two dozen others were injured so badly they could not perform their duties, though within days most were treated and released from a hospital in Guam. Most of the crew were treated for some injury.

    Another 97 of 137 crewmembers reported injuries ranging from minor bruising and muscle strains to two who suffered dislocated shoulders. Sixty-eight of them were evaluated and treated onboard, while the remaining 29 were treated at Naval Hospital Guam when San Francisco returned to port under its own power Jan. 10. Just three of them were admitted overnight for further evaluation and treatment.

    Ashley's parents were notified the death of their son 20 hours earlier.

    Navy man Joseph Ashley remembered for `Dixie' tune, big smile Sub accident leaves a void

    By Marilyn Miller, Beacon Journal staff writer

    The 24-year-old Navy man died Sunday after a submarine accident. The family was told Friday their son hit his head on a pump when the nuclear submarine he was stationed on ran aground about 350 miles from its home port in Guam.

    The Navy was preparing to fly Vicki and Dan Ashley to their son's bedside. They knew the injury was serious, but their son was holding on. On television Friday night, the parents watched and sympathized with the families of six soldiers who were killed in a car bombing in Iraq.

    ``I said those families would love to be in our position, because at least our son is alive,'' Dan Ashley said. They went to bed unsettled, but relieved. Vicki Ashley tossed and turned so much that night she moved to the couch in the living room to try to rest. ``I couldn't sleep, but when I saw a flash of lights from a car pulling into the driveway about 2 a.m., I knew my Joey was gone,'' she said.

    ``I looked out the window and saw two men dressed in uniform. I ran to tell my husband.'' The men confirmed her fears. ``I nodded to them to go ahead. I already knew what they had to say,'' said Dan Ashley, a former Navy man himself. They stood at attention and announced Machinist's Mate 2nd Class Ashley's death.

    It was then the parents learned their son died while medics prepared him for transport to a military hospital. He had never regained consciousness from the accident. The Navy has launched an investigation into the accident, in which 19 other sailors were injured.

    The time difference between Ohio (EST) and Guam is 1500hrs. The accident supposedly happened at 1143 hrs 8 Jan 2005 (Guam Time). That would be 2043hrs on Friday 7 Jan (EST). Ashley's parents were officially informed of Ashley's death on Sat 8 Jan 0200hrs EST which was 1700hrs Sat 8 Jan 2005 (Guam Time) or just 5 hours after the purported accident.

    The official reported time of death was 1313 hrs Sun 9 Jan (Guam Time) or 2213 hrs Sat 8 Jan 2005 EST; which is 20 hours later. Could the Navy have notified the parents 20 hours earlier when Ashley was still alive?

    Is that why “The sailor's next of kin had been notified” when Lt. J.G. Adam Clampitt of the Pacific Fleet offered his condolences early Sunday?

    At 0904 the Seal Dr, The Seal HM2, and medical equipment were trnasfered to the San Fran. Efforts were made to transfer MM2 Ashley, but were unsuccessful. Ashley was pronounced dead at 1311.

    But why would the navy lie even on Ashley's time of death? Ashley probably died 25 ½ hours after the accident on 26 Dec 2004. The Navy could not inform the parents the truth as it would expose the whole scam. They had to adjust the time his death with the new fake accident on 8 Jan. So when the doctors from Guam Naval hospital arrived on the morning of 9 Jan 2005, they found a dead cold body of Ashley. Of course they were told to hush up just like anybody who was involved in the rescue mission.

    Naturally the USS San Francisco port departure on 7 Jan 2005 from Guam and the 3 Jan 20005 phone call Ashley was supposed to make from Guam never happened. It would have been easy for the Navy to produce confidential logs and records to show these two important events. But they did not think it was necessary since the world had already accepted the “accident at Micronesia” story. It would also be absurd to show the confidential records to substantiate these 2 events out of the blues. Any records they show now are likely to be fake than authentic.

    A real accident on 26 Dec offshore Sumatra and a fake coverup accident at Micronesoa would make sense

    Story by Zita Taitano January 9, 2005

    The running aground of the U.S.S. San Francisco about 350 miles to the south of Guam on Saturday afternoon resulted in 20 injured sailors. The Los Angeles-class fast attack submarine was conducting submerged operations when the incident occurred. U.S. Navy spokesperson Lieutenant Arwen Consaul confirms the sailors were injured, one of which critically so, and that they are being treated by medical personnel onboard the submarine.

    It also appears more help is on the way thanks to the U.S. Coast Guard. Spokesperson Petty Officer Jennifer Johnson of the Coast Guard District 14 Public Affairs Office in Hawaii says the USCG Cutter Galveston Island is on its way to the submarine with a team of medical personnel to help treat the injured sailors. "The Coast Guard's priority is safety at sea and its ability to respond is our priority and we're happy that we could help when our assistance was needed," said Johnson.

    The US Navy's acclaimed rapid-advanced rescue respond is unrivaled anywhere in the world. No cost is too high when it involves the lives of American servicemen. Perhaps the answers lie in the awards and punishments meted out to the crew. Isn't it a bit of an irony to praise and yet punished them. Given a choice the Navy would have awarded them all medals; for not only surviving an ordeal arising from a secret deep sea mission, but in performing it exceptionally well. The accident was unavoidable being so close to the epicentre of one of the largest earthquakes in human history.

    But their heroic efforts especially Commander Moore, cannot be publicly acknowledged. Yet he must be punished publicly for a surprisingly “stupid” mistake which no competent crew could have committed under normal circumstances let alone on a non-combat leisure cruise. They had to be sacrificed and punished publicly after an initial hesitation. Not to do so would arouse public suspicion of a fake accident.

    You have to believe “Pigs can fly” before believing this fake high speed collision. The official report stated that 24-year-old Ashley's death and the injury of the other crew members were in the line of duty and not due to misconduct. "Earlier evacuation or arrival of medical officers would not have changed the outcome for (Petty Officer) Ashley" the investigation said of the two additional medical personnel flown aboard by helicopter and two attempts to medically evacuate him by helicopter.

    Two attempts to medically evacuate him by helicopter? There was no report of medivac on the day of the accident just 360 n_miles from Guam. There was only one heli-transfer on the morning of 9 Jan. “Some of his shipmates cursed and cried in frustration” described a seemingly hopeless situation against all odds. Sounds a lot more like “the desperate situation of a damaged vessel stranded alone in the middle of the ocean” than a vessel being escorted by several rescue boats and a successful heli-transfer of medical personnel onboard.

    The highest awards, the Navy's Meritorious Service Medal, went to Hospitalman 1st Class James H. Akin, the ship's "doc," and Lt. j.g. Craig E. Litty for organizing the crew's mess into an emergency trauma center and providing triage to more than 70 injured sailors over two days. "When initial medical supplies were expended, (they) devised innovative methods to provide continued oxygen and other first aid treatment," the citation reads. The citation also credited their "accurate diagnoses of injuries and exacting recommendations" for treatment.

    The 24-year-old Ashley, of Akron Ohio, died from the collision and another 97 of the 137 crewmembers reported injuries ranging from minor bruising and muscle strains to two who suffered dislocated shoulders. According to the report; Ashley's head injury was inevitably critical. His death and the injury of the other crewmembers were in the line of duty and not due to misconduct.

    Again the description fit more of the rescue attempts (medivac) using choppers from one of the advancing battleship in the Strike Force 5 armada. The tale of 2 submarine accidents (one fake & one real) still perplexes military experts around the world.

    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0JIW/is_1_61/ai_n24959889/pg_2/?tag=content;col1

    Even though the Chinese navy evidently has extreme respect for the U.S. submarine force, the analyses of the San Francisco incident appear to show awareness that even this elite force can make errors and must invest in cutting-edge rescue technologies.

     

  • Story Photo

    Saturday, Oct 15, 2011 - Gulf Shores, Alabama Shrimp Festival PROTEST! Protesters demonstrated on the beach, per the agreement with city officials, who had safety concerns due to a large number of people who attended the festival. Protestors were kept well away from the crowd and were not allowed to use any kind of electrical or battery type of amplification (ex: microphone).

    All my gulf heroes in action at the beach. Please watch and support. Thank you.

  • Story Photo

    Benjamin Fulford was recently interviewed by Sean David Morton. For those interested, links to the show are below. The shortened version contains only Ben’s interview, and all commercial breaks and music were removed (a link to the complete show is also given below).

  • Story Photo

    Aguinaga's blood has tested positive for high levels of chemicals present in BP's oil, and he described his ailments to Al Jazeera.

    "I have terrible chest pain, at times I can't seem to get enough oxygen, and I'm constantly tired with pains all over my body. At times I'm pissing blood, vomiting dark brown stuff, and every pore of my body is dispensing water."

    His symptoms mirror those which scores of other Gulf Coast residents have told to Al Jazeera, all of them also having had their blood tests reveal chemicals in BP's oil.

    Yet Aguinaga's hardships have not ended with his health problems.

    "After we got back from our vacation in Florida, Merrick went to work for a company contracted by BP to clean up oil in Grand Isle, Louisiana. Two weeks after that he dropped dead."

    New battles

    This Spring Aguinaga filed a lawsuit against BP in hopes of obtaining compensation for his deteriorating health.

    Aguinaga's attorney encouraged him with the prospect of setting a precedent for other health-related lawsuits against BP. But instead of bringing Aguinaga relief, the process has turned his life upside down.

    Within 30 days of filing the lawsuit, Aguinaga had his home in Hazelhurst, Mississippi broken into.

  • Story Photo

    Official Trailer for "The Big Fix" a Green Planet Production by Josh and Rebecca Tickell

  • Story Photo

    Though many believe a link between the BP oil spill and the elevated death rate seems obvious, dolphins actually began dying a month before the spill. 
    'Unusual mortality event' for dolphins not unheard of 
    To report dead dolphins
    To report dolphin and other marine mammal strandings, call: 1-877-942-5343 (1-877-Whale-help).
    In March of 2010, 56 dolphins washed ashore in the Gulf, compared to the seven-year average of 16 for the month. 
    Mass die-offs of dolphins are not unheard of. Fifty-three dolphins washed up on South Carolina beaches this year, and three or four such events typically occur each year around the country. 
    The majority of the time, the official cause of death is listed as "undetermined," according to federal records. 
    What’s unusual about what is happening in the Gulf is the duration of the die-off, now well into its second year. It’s possible, scientists said, that whatever killed dolphins in March of 2010 — be it a cold winter, scarce food supplies, or a virus — meant the population was already in a weakened position when the Gulf spill began. 

  • Weather warfare techniques are finally admitted to on mainstream media.

    Will the public finally wake up to the constant spraying and geoengineering that's taking place all over the planet, right above our heads..?

    History Channel - Weather Warfare - Weather Modification - Chemtrails - HAARP - ELF Frequencies - Aerosols, heavy metal spraying - Geoengineering - Terraforming - Zbigniew Brzezinski - Between Two Ages - Technetronic Era - Climate Change/Global Warming/Cooling Fraud - Global Dimming - Eugenics - Depopulation - De-development - World government

  • Story Photo

    IT'S TOO LATE TO STOP IT NOW

    The best the Powers that Were can do now is to appear to support the Occupy Wall Street movement, because they know their entire "black economy" is about to be closed down anyway.

    It is too late, and they know it. The battle has been lost. They didn't think it was possible they could ever be defeated, but now they are well aware of their own impending collapse... thanks to this vast, international coalition.

    There is real terror among them now. They pushed it too far. They stole too much. They told too many lies. They got too greedy. And now their time has run out.

    Their final plan is to attempt to run and hide from justice as it all comes crashing down around them... such as in massive complexes on land they have annexed in South America.

    They are also planning to create significant damage on the way out.

    I have had at least 100 different dreams revealing various aspects of this scenario in the last three years, some of which I've posted here, and I have been given every assurance that these plans will not succeed.

  • About this Author
    Vineacity
    Articles Posted: 90
    Links Seeded: 281
    Member Since: 7/2010
    Last Seen: 2/23/2012
    Happy to contribute and share my 30 years work experience and knowledge as a geohazards specialist towards averting geohazards disasters.

    Follow BK Lim to get e-mail or watchlist alerts whenever new content is published, or subscribe via RSS:

    RSS
    BK Lim's Watchlist

    Groups & Authors:

    • (none)

    Tags & Regions:

    • (none)

    BK Lim's Private Content
    BK Lim has not published any private articles, seeds, or discussions that you have access to.
    BK Lim's Latest Comments